The Failure of Nonviolence

From AnarWiki
Revision as of 18:53, 3 April 2024 by Anaradmin (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "Libertarian Socialist Media" to "Anarchist Media")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The Failure of Nonviolence is a 2015 book written by Peter Gelderloos which heavily criticizes Pacifism.

Summary

Chapter 3: The Revolutions of Today

38 different 'uprisings' (mass protests, riots, uprisings and revolutions) from 1990 - 2014 and are examined, these events followed a mix of pacifist and non-pacifist strategies, and are compared for successfulness. Those evaluated include:

From an analysis of these 38 different uprisings, four conclusions were drawn.

  1. Movements that use a diversity of tactics are overwhelmingly more effective at seizing and defending space, and using that autonomy to put new social relations into practice, whether through practices of self-organization, collective self-defense, the reanimation of indigenous ways of life, or collectivization and communization (ending the alienation of capitalist property, which dictates that everything an be bought and sold, and putting our resources in common in a spirit of mutual aid rather than profit).
  2. Movements that use a diversity of tactics are more likely to spread, to inspire other people to take action, and they are much more likely than nonviolent movements to spread radical ideas and social critiques, whereas the majority of nonviolent movements are connected to populist complaints and watered-down slogans either lacking in social content or relying on the same social analysis disseminated by the mass media.
  3. Nonviolent movements are exponentially more likely to receive substantial elite support. The primary case in which combative movements receive elite support is when they crop up in opposition to governments that are at odds with ruling states (as when NATO will support people rebelling against the Libyan government).
  4. Excluding the achievement of free elections, which both combative and peaceful movements have proven effective at winning, movements that use a diversity of tactics have a better track record of achieving concrete gains.

External Links