Biennio Rosso

The Biennio Rosso (English: "Two Red Years") was a period of intense social conflict and strikes in Italy during 1919 and 1920. It arguably led to the emergence of fascism in Italy.

Background

The socialist and anarchist movement had been growing in Italy since the 1890s, and following World War I Italy entered an economic crisis with high unemployment and political instability.

Events

The Biennio Rosso was characterised by by factory and land occupations, mass strikes and workers' control. Socialist organisations also massively increased in membership

The population was confronted with rising inflation and a significant increase in the price of basic goods, in a period that extensive unemployment was aggravated by mass demobilization of the Royal Italian Army at the end of the war. Association to the trade unions, the Italian Socialist Party (PSI), and the anarchist movement increased substantially. The PSI increased its membership to 250,000, and the major Socialist trade union, the General Confederation of Labour (Confederazione Generale del Lavoro, CGL), reached two million members, while the anarchist Italian Syndicalist Union (Unione Sindacale Italiana, USI) reached between 300,000 and 500,000 affiliates. The vigour of the anarchists was boosted by the return from exile of the anarchist leader Errico Malatesta in December 1919.^[3][4]

In Turin and Milan, factory councils – which the leading Italian Marxist theoretician Antonio Gramsci considered to be the Italian equivalent of Russia’s soviets^[5] – were formed and many factory occupations took place under the leadership of revolutionary socialists and anarcho-syndicalists.^{[6][better source needed]} The agitations also extended to the agricultural areas of the Padan plain and were accompanied by peasant strikes, rural unrests and armed conflicts between left-wing and right-wing militias.

Industrial action and rural unrest increased significantly: there were 1,663 industrial strikes in 1919, compared to 810 in 1913. More than one million industrial workers were involved in 1919, three times the 1913 figure. The trend continued in 1920, which saw 1,881 industrial strikes. Rural strikes also increased substantially, from 97 in 1913 to 189 by 1920, with over a million peasants taking action.^[7][8] On July 20-21, 1919, a general strike was called in solidarity with the Russian Revolution.^[6]

In April 1920, Turin metal-workers, in particular at the Fiat plants, went on strike demanding recognition for their 'factory councils', a demand the PSI and CGL did not support. The 'factory councils' more and more saw themselves as the models for a new democratically controlled economy running industrial plants, instead of as a bargaining tool with employers.^[2] The movement peaked in August and September 1920. Armed metal workers in Milan and Turin occupied their factories in response to a lockout by the employers. Factory occupations swept the "industrial triangle" of north-western Italy. Some 400,000 metal-workers and 100,000 others took part.^[2][9] On September 3, 185 metal-working factories in Turin had been occupied.^[10]

The PSI and CGL failed to see the revolutionary potential of the movement; had it been maximized and expanded to the rest of Italy, a revolutionary transformation might have been possible. Most Socialist leaders were pleased with the struggles in the North, but did little to capitalize on the impact of the occupations and uprisings. Without the support and quarantined, the movement for social change gradually waned.^[2]

Aftermath

By 1921, the movement was declining due to an industrial crisis that resulted in massive layoffs and wage cuts. In contrast to passive demeanor the PSI and CGL, employers and the upcoming fascist did react.^[2] The revolutionary period was followed by the violent reaction of the Fascist blackshirts militia (the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento) and eventually by the March on Rome of Benito Mussolini in October 1922.^[2][9]

A quantitative sociological study of the period by analyzing newspaper news in the period^[11] (see figure) clearly demonstrates the evolution of violence acts between the social groups involved.