Co-optation: Difference between revisions

From AnarWiki
imported>PoliticalAustralian
No edit summary
imported>PoliticalAustralian
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Co-optation''' or '''recuperation''' is a concept developed by the [[Situationism|Situationists]] to explain why social movements often fail to deliver on their promises. It talks about how various forms of power are able to destroy threats to them by integrating the movement into power itself.
'''Co-optation''' or '''recuperation''' is a concept developed by the [[Situationism|Situationists]] to explain why social movements often fail to deliver on their promises. It talks about how various forms of power are able to destroy threats to them by integrating the movement into power itself.  


== Ens ==
Hijacking involves flipping the roles, where social movements take cultural concepts from the power structures.
[[Category:Libertarian Socialist Wiki]]
 
== Examples ==
* States often tend to promote pacifist ideas and movements in order to co-opt them.<ref>~ [[Peter Gelderloos]] (2005) - [[How Nonviolence Protects the State]]</ref>
* The legacy of [[Martin Luther King Jr.]] - a socialist who criticized 'white moderates' - is often quoted out of context to guilt modern activists who are loud or militant.
 
== See Also ==
* [[Hijacking]]
* [[Normalisation]]
* [[Internalisation]]
 
== References ==
<references />[[Category:Libertarian Socialist Wiki]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Concepts]]

Revision as of 09:36, 29 November 2019

Co-optation or recuperation is a concept developed by the Situationists to explain why social movements often fail to deliver on their promises. It talks about how various forms of power are able to destroy threats to them by integrating the movement into power itself.

Hijacking involves flipping the roles, where social movements take cultural concepts from the power structures.

Examples

  • States often tend to promote pacifist ideas and movements in order to co-opt them.[1]
  • The legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. - a socialist who criticized 'white moderates' - is often quoted out of context to guilt modern activists who are loud or militant.

See Also

References