Contradictions of Liberalism: Difference between revisions

From AnarWiki
imported>PoliticalAustralian
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "libertarian socialists" to "anarchists")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This article outlines the '''contradictions of liberalism''', or the ways in which [[Liberalism|liberal]] governments contradict their own values. As such, this article takes representative democracy, capitalism, punitive justice and reformism as justified. Even if as libertarian socialists we have our own critiques of these concepts.
This article outlines the '''contradictions of liberalism''', or the ways in which [[Liberalism|liberal]] governments contradict their own values. As such, this article takes representative democracy, capitalism, punitive justice and reformism as justified. Even if as anarchists we have our own critiques of these concepts.


== General Contradictions ==
== General Contradictions ==
Line 92: Line 92:


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
 
[[Category:Libertarian Socialist Wiki]]
[[Category:AnarWiki]]
[[Category:Liberalism]]
[[Category:Liberalism]]

Latest revision as of 18:37, 3 April 2024

This article outlines the contradictions of liberalism, or the ways in which liberal governments contradict their own values. As such, this article takes representative democracy, capitalism, punitive justice and reformism as justified. Even if as anarchists we have our own critiques of these concepts.

General Contradictions

  • Liberalism often justifies itself by claiming to have 'checks and balances' to prevent a authoritarian regime from coming to power. Let's look at all the times that failed in the 20th and 21st centuries alone:

Note: we won't be covering liberal democracies which became authoritarian after an invasion, like France and Norway in World War II

    • Algeria
    • Angola
    • Argentina
    • Belarus
    • Benin
    • Bolivia
    • Brazil
    • Burkina Faso
    • Burundi
    • Cameroon
    • Cape Verde
    • Central African Republic
    • Chad
    • Chile
    • Comoros
    • Congo
    • Cuba
    • Democratic Republic of the Congo
    • Djibouti
    • Ecuador
    • Egypt
    • Equatorial Guinea
    • Eswatini
    • Ethiopia
    • Gabon
    • Germany
    • Ghana
    • Greece
    • Guatemala
    • Guinea
    • Guinea-Bissau
    • Hungary
    • Ivory Coast
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Lesotho
    • Liberia
    • Libya
    • Madagascar
    • Malawi
    • Mali
    • Morocco
    • Mozambique
    • Niger
    • Nigeria
    • Pakistan
    • Panama
    • Paraguay
    • Peru
    • Portugal
    • Russia
    • São Tomé and Príncipe
    • Seychelles
    • Sierra Leone
    • Somalia
    • South Korea
    • South Sudan
    • Spain
    • Sudan
    • Syria
    • Thailand
    • The Gambia
    • Togo
    • Turkey
    • Uganda
    • Uruguay
    • Venezuela
    • Zambia
    • Zimbabwe
  • This means that, only 3 out of 3 liberal countries have managed to stay completely true to liberal values since their independence or overthrowing of a dictator who ruled during independence, they are:
    • In Africa: Botswana, Mauritius, Namibia and Tunisia. Meaning that 92% of liberal governments have failed to live up to the standards of liberalism.
    • In South America: None, meaning 100% of liberal governments failed to live up to liberalism.

Iceland

See Also

References