Commons: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 17:43, 3 April 2024

Commons (also known as Common, Collective or Community Ownership) refers to a way of managing and owning land, natural resources and industry in collective and democratic manner for the benefit of all in society as opposed to state or private ownership.

Successful Commons

According to economist Elinor Ostrom, the success of the commons depends on eight key factors:

Clearly defined (clear definition of the contents of the common pool resource and effective exclusion of external un-entitled parties);
The appropriation and provision of common resources that are adapted to local conditions;
Collective-choice arrangements that allow most resource appropriators to participate in the decision-making process;
Effective monitoring by monitors who are part of or accountable to the appropriators;
A scale of graduated sanctions for resource appropriators who violate community rules;
Mechanisms of conflict resolution that are cheap and of easy access;
Self-determination of the community recognized by higher-level authorities; and
In the case of larger common-pool resources, organization in the form of multiple layers of nested enterprises, with small local CPRs at the base level.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 # Mechanisms of conflict resolution that are cheap and of easy access;
 # Self-determination of the community recognized by higher-level authorities; and
-# In the case of larger common-pool resources, organization in the form of multiple layers of nested enterprises, with small local CPRs at the base level.
+# In the case of larger common-pool resources, organization in the form of multiple layers of nested enterprises, with small local CPRs at the base level.[[Category:Concepts]]
-== Famous Examples by Country/State ==
-=== Mongolia ===
-Based on a research project by the Environmental and Cultural Conservation in Inner Asia (ECCIA) from 1992 to 1995, satellite images were used to compare the amount of land degradation due to livestock grazing in the regions of Mongolia, [[Russian Federation|Russia]], and [[People's Republic of China|China]]. In Mongolia, where shepherds were permitted to move collectively between seasonal grazing pastures, degradation remained relatively low at approximately 9%. Comparatively, Russia and China, which mandated state-owned pastures involving immobile settlements and in some cases privatization by household, had much higher degradation, at around 75% and 33% respectively.
-=== Nepal ===
-In the late 1980s, Nepal chose to decentralize government control over forests. Community forest programs work by giving local areas a financial stake in nearby woodlands, and thereby increasing the incentive to protect them from overuse. Local institutions regulate harvesting and selling of timber and land, and must use any profit towards community development and preservation of the forests. In twenty years, locals have noticed a visible increase in the number of trees. Community forestry may also contribute to community development in rural areas – for instance school construction, irrigation and drinking water channel construction, and road construction. Community forestry has proven conducive to democratic practices at grass roots level.
-=== United States ===
-Widespread success of the Maine lobster industry is often attributed to the willingness of Maine's lobstermen to uphold and support lobster conservation rules. These rules include harbor territories not recognized by the state, informal trap limits, and laws imposed by the state of Maine (which are largely influenced by lobbying from lobster industry itself). Essentially, the lobstermen collaborate without much government intervention to sustain their common-pool resource.
-== References ==
-<references />[[Category:Concepts]]
 [[Category:Libertarian Socialism]]
 [[Category:Anarchism]]
 [[Category:Anarcho-Communism]]
 [[Category:Mutualism]]
-[[Category:Libertarian Socialist Wiki]]
+[[Category:AnarWiki]]
 [[Category:Commons]]