View source for J.5.1 (An Anarchist FAQ)

'''J.5.1 What is community unionism? (An Anarchist FAQ)''' is the 40th entry in [[Section J: What do anarchists do? (An Anarchist FAQ)|Section J]] and 1st entry of [[J.5 What alternative social organisations do anarchists create?|Section J.5]] of [[An Anarchist FAQ]]. It details the anarchist use of [[Community Organising|community organising]] and creation of [[Democratic Assembly|neighbourhood assemblies]] in [[Dual Power|dual power]] with the state, citing anarchist activities in the [[Anti-Poll Tax Movement]], [[Puerto Real]] ([[Spain]]) and [[Spezzano Albanese]] ([[Italy]]) as two successful examples of this.

== Transcript ==
Community unionism is our term for the process of creating participatory communities (called “communes” in classical anarchism) within the state. Basically, a community union is the creation of interested members of a community who decide to form an organisation to fight against injustice in their local community and for improvements within it. It is a forum by which inhabitants can raise issues that affect themselves and others and provide a means of solving these problems. As such, it is a means of directly involving local people in the life of their own communities and collectively solving the problems facing them as both individuals and as part of a wider society. Politics, therefore, is not separated into a specialised activity that only certain people do (i.e. politicians). Instead, it becomes communalised and part of everyday life and in the hands of all.
As would be imagined, like the participatory communities that would exist in an anarchist society, the community union would be based upon a mass assembly of its members. Here would be discussed the issues that effect the membership and how to solve them. Like the communes of a future anarchy, these community unions would be [[Confederation|confederated]] with other unions in different areas in order to co-ordinate joint activity and solve common problems. These confederations, like the basic union assemblies themselves, would be based upon direct democracy, mandated delegates and the creation of administrative action committees to see that the memberships decisions are carried out.

The community union could also raise funds for [[Strike|strikes]] and other social protests, organise [[Picket|pickets]] and [[Boycott|boycotts]] and generally aid others in struggle. By organising their own forms of [[Direct Action|direct action]] (such as [[Tax Strike|tax]] and [[Rent Strike|rent strikes]], [[Environmentalism|environmental protests]] and so on) they can weaken the [[State (Polity)|state]] while building an self-managed infrastructure of [[Cooperative|co-operatives]] to replace the useful functions the state or capitalist firms currently provide. So, in addition to organising resistance to the state and capitalist firms, these community unions could play an important role in creating an [[Solidarity Economy|alternative economy]] within capitalism. For example, such unions could have a [[Mutual Banking|mutual bank]] or [[Credit Union|credit union]] associated with them which could allow funds to be gathered for the creation of self-managed co-operatives and social services and [[Social Center|centres]]. 

In this way a communalised co-operative sector could develop, along with a communal confederation of community unions and their co-operative banks. Such community unions have been formed in many different countries in recent years to fight against particularly evil attacks on the working class. In [[United Kingdom|Britain]], groups were created in neighbourhoods across the country to organise non-payment of the conservative government’s community charge (popularly known as the poll tax). Federations of these groups and unions were created to co-ordinate the struggle and pull resources and, in the end, ensured that the government withdrew the hated tax and helped push [[Magaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] out of government. 

In [[Ireland]], similar groups were formed to defeat the [[privatisation]] of the [[water]] industry by a similar non-payment campaign. However, few of these groups have been taken as part of a wider strategy to empower the local community but the few that have indicate the potential of such a strategy. This potential can be seen from two examples of community organising in Europe, one in Italy and another in Spain. In Italy, anarchists have organised a very successful Municipal Federation of the Base (FMB) in Spezzano Albanese (in the South of that country). This organisation is “an alternative to the power of the town hall” and provides a “glimpse of what a [[List of Anarchist Societies|future libertarian society]] could be” (in the words of one activist). The aim of the Federation is “the bringing together of all interests within the district. In intervening at a municipal level, we become involved not only in the world of work but also the life of the community... the FMB make counter proposals [to Town Hall decisions], which aren’t presented to the Council but proposed for discussion in the area to raise people’s level of consciousness. Whether they like it or not the Town Hall is obliged to take account of these proposals.”[“[[Community Organising in Southern Italy (Pamphlet)|Community Organising in Southern Italy]]”, pp. 16–19, Black Flag no. 210, p. 17, p. 18]

In this way, local people take part in deciding what effects them and their community and create a self-managed “dual power” to the local, and national, state. They also, by taking part in self-managed community assemblies, develop their ability to participate and manage their own affairs, so showing that the state is unnecessary and harmful to their interests. In addition, the FMB also supports co-operatives within it, so creating a communalised, self-managed economic sector within capitalism. Such a development helps to reduce the problems facing isolated co-operatives in a capitalist economy — see [[J.5.11 If workers really want self-management, why aren’t there more producer co-operatives? (An Anarchist FAQ)|section J.5.11]] — and was actively done in order to "seek to bring together all the currents, all the problems and contradictions, to seek solutions" to such problems facing co-operatives [Ibid.].

Elsewhere in Europe, the long, hard work of the [[National Confederation of Labour (Spain)|C.N.T.]] in Spain has also resulted in mass village assemblies being created in the Puerto Real area, near Cadiz. These community assemblies came about to support an industrial struggle by shipyard workers. As one C.N.T. member explains, “[e]very Thursday of every week, in the towns and villages in the area, we had all-village assemblies where anyone connected with the particular issue [of the rationalisation of the shipyards], whether they were actually workers in the shipyard itself, or women or children or grandparents, could go along... and actually vote and take part in the decision making process of what was going to takeplace.” [[[Anarcho-Syndicalism in Puerto Real (Pamphlet)|Anarcho-Syndicalism in Puerto Real: from shipyard resistance to direct democracyaand community control]], p. 6] With such popular input and support, the shipyard workers won their struggle. However, the assembly continued after the strike and “managed to link together twelve different organisations within the local area that are all interested in fighting... various aspects [of capitalism]” including health, taxation, economic, ecological and cultural issues. Moreover, the struggle “created a structure which was very different from the kind of structure of political parties, where the decisions are made at the top and they filter down. What we managed to do in Puerto Real was make decisions at the base and take them upwards.”[Ibid.]

In these ways, a grassroots movement from below has been created, with direct democracy and participation becoming an inherent part of a local political culture of resistance, with people deciding things for themselves directly and without hierarchy. Such developments are the embryonic structures of a world based around direct democracy and participation, with a strong and dynamic community life. For, as [[Martin Buber]] argued,“[t]he more a human group lets itself be represented in the management of its common affairs... the less communal life there is in it and the more impoverished it becomes as a community.” [[[Paths in Utopia (Book)|Paths in Utopia]], p. 133] Anarchist support and encouragement of community unionism, by creating the means for communal self-management, helps to enrich the community as well as creating the organisational forms required to resist the state and capitalism. In this way we build the anti-state which will (hopefully) replace the state. 

Moreover, the combination of community unionism with [[Workers' Council|workplace assemblies]] (as in Puerto Real), provides a mutual support network which can be very effective in helping winning struggles. For example, in Glasgow, Scotland in 1916, a [[Glasgow Rent Strike (1915)|massive rent strike]] was finally won when workers came out in strike in support of the rent strikers who been arrested for non-payment. Such developments indicate that [[Isaac Puente]] was correct to argue that: “[[Anarcho-Communism|Libertarian Communism]] is a society organised without the state and without private ownership. And there is no need to invent anything or conjure up some new organization for the purpose. The centres about which life in the future will be organised are already with us in the society of today: the free union and the free municipality [or Commune]. 

“The union: in it combine spontaneously the workers from factories and all places of collective exploitation. “And the free municipality: an assembly with roots stretching back into the past where, again in spontaneity, inhabitants of village and hamlet combine together, and which points the way to the solution of problems in social life in the countryside. “Both kinds of organisation, run on federal and democratic principles, will be soveriegn in their decision making, without being beholden to any higher body, their only obligation being to federate one with another as dictated by the economic requirement for liaison and communications bodies organised in industrial federations.

“The union and the free municipality will assume the collective or common owner-ship of everything which is under private ownership at present [but collectively used] and will regulate production and consumption (in a word, the economy) in each locality. “The very bringing together of the two terms (communism and libertarian) is indicative in itself of the fusion of two ideas: one of them is collectivist, tending to bring about harmony in the whole through the contributions and cooperation of individuals, without undermining their independence in any way; while the other is individualist, seeking to reassure the individual that his independence will be respected.” [[[Libertarian Communism (Pamphlet by Isaac Puente)|Libertarian Communism]], pp. 6–7]

The combination of community unionism, along with industrial unionism (see [[J.5.2 Why do anarchists support industrial unionism? (An Anarchist FAQ)|next section]]), will be the key of creating an anarchist society, Community unionism, by creating the free commune within the state, allows us to become accustomed to managing our own affairs and seeing that an injury to one is an injury to all. In this way a social power is created in opposition to the state. The town council may still be in the hands of politicians, but neither they nor the central government can move without worrying about what the people’s reaction might be, as expressed and organised in their community unions and assemblies.
[[Category:Community Organizing]]
[[Category:AnarWiki]]
[[Category:An Anarchist FAQ]]