View source for Individualist anarchism

{{short description|Branch of anarchism that emphasizes the individual and their will}}
{{about|the branch of anarchism that emphasizes the individual and their will over external determinants such as groups, society, traditions and ideological systems|the branch of anarchism advocating for free markets|Free-market anarchism|the anti-authoritarian, anti-statist and libertarian political philosophy within the socialist movement|Libertarian socialism|the branch of anarchism emphasizing communal individuality and mutual aid|Social anarchism}}
{{Very long|date=March 2023}}
{{anarchism sidebar|schools}}
{{individualism sidebar|philosophies}}
{{libertarianism sidebar|origins}}
'''Individualist anarchism''' is the branch of [[anarchism]] that emphasizes the [[individual]] and their [[Will (philosophy)|will]] over external determinants such as groups, society, traditions, and ideological systems.<ref name="ryner">"What do I mean by individualism? I mean by individualism the moral doctrine which, relying on no dogma, no tradition, no external determination, appeals only to the individual conscience". [http://www.marx.org/archive/ryner/1905/mini-manual.htm ''Mini-Manual of Individualism''] by Han Ryner {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927072655/http://www.marx.org/archive/ryner/1905/mini-manual.htm|date=27 September 2011}}</ref><ref name="tucker">"I do not admit anything except the existence of the individual, as a condition of his sovereignty. To say that the sovereignty of the individual is conditioned by Liberty is simply another way of saying that it is conditioned by itself. "Anarchism and the State" in ''Individual Liberty''</ref> Although usually contrasted with [[social anarchism]],<ref name="McKay, Iain 2008. pp 59-60">McKay, Iain. ''An Anarchist FAQ.'' AK Press. Oakland. 2008. pp 59-60.</ref> both individualist and social<ref name="McKay, Iain 2008. pp 59-60"/> anarchism have influenced each other. [[mutualism (economic theory)|Mutualism]], an economic theory sometimes considered a synthesis of [[communism]], [[market economy]] and [[property]],<ref>Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph (1840). [https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/ ''What Is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210908022235/https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/ |date=2021-09-08 }}. [https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/ch05.htm "Chapter V. Psychological Exposition of the Idea of Justice and Injustice, and a Determination of the Principle of Government and of Right"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200227164202/https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/ |date=2020-02-27 }}. "This third form of society, the synthesis of communism and property, we call liberty".</ref> has been considered individualist anarchism<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|editor-last=Rines|editor-first=George Edwin|editor-link=George Edwin Rines|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopedia Americana|The Encyclopedia Americana: A Library of Universal Knowledge]]|title=Anarchism|url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hn52hq;view=1up;seq=722|via=Hathi Trust|year=1918|volume=1|location=New York|oclc=7308909|lccn=18016023|pages=624|access-date=2019-12-21|archive-date=2020-04-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200402193516/https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hn52hq;view=1up;seq=722|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Hamilton|first=Peter|title=Émile Durkheim|publisher=Routledge|location=New York|year=1995|isbn=978-0415110471|page=79}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Faguet|first=Émile|title=Politicians & Moralists of the Nineteenth Century|publisher=Books for Libraries Press|location=Freeport|year=1970|isbn=978-0-8369-1828-1|page=147}}</ref> and other times part of social anarchism.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Bowen|first1=James|last2=Purkis|first2=Jon|title=Changing Anarchism: Anarchist Theory and Practice in a Global Age|url=https://archive.org/details/changinganarchis00bowe|url-access=limited|publisher=Manchester University Press|year=2004|page=[https://archive.org/details/changinganarchis00bowe/page/n30 24]|isbn=9780719066948}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Knowles|first=Rob|title=Political Economy From Below: Communitarian Anarchism as a Neglected Discourse in Histories of Economic Thought|journal=History of Economics Review|volume=31|pages=30–47|number=31|date=Winter 2000|doi=10.1080/10370196.2000.11733332|s2cid=141027974}}</ref> Many [[anarcho-communists]] regard themselves as radical individualists,<ref name="Stirner: The Ego and His Own">[[Max Baginski|Baginki, Max]] (May 1907). [http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/goldman/ME/mev2n3.html#142 "Stirner: The Ego and His Own"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907103320/http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/goldman/ME/mev2n3.html#142 |date=2017-09-07 }}. ''[[Mother Earth (magazine)|Mother Earth]]'' (2: 3). "Modern Communists are more individualistic than Stirner. To them, not merely religion, morality, family and State are spooks, but property also is no more than a spook, in whose name the individual is enslaved — and how enslaved! [...] Communism thus creates a basis for the liberty and [[wikt:Eigenheit|Eigenheit]] of the individual. I am a Communist because I am an Individualist. Fully as heartily the Communists concur with Stirner when he puts the word take in place of demand — that leads to the dissolution of property, to expropriation. Individualism and Communism go hand in hand."; [[Renzo Novatore|Novatore, Renzo]] (1924). [http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Renzo_Novatore__Toward_the_Creative_Nothing.html "Towards the Creative Nothing"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728093004/http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Renzo_Novatore__Toward_the_Creative_Nothing.html |date=2011-07-28 }}; Gray, Christopher (1974). ''Leaving the Twentieth Century''. p. 88; [[The Abolition of Work|Black, Bob]] (2010). [http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Bob_Black__Nightmares_of_Reason.html#toc22 "Nightmares of Reason"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101027102331/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Bob_Black__Nightmares_of_Reason.html#toc22 |date=2010-10-27 }}. "[C]ommunism is the final fulfillment of individualism. [...] The apparent contradiction between individualism and communism rests on a misunderstanding of both. [...] Subjectivity is also objective: the individual really is subjective. It is nonsense to speak of "emphatically prioritizing the social over the individual," [...]. You may as well speak of prioritizing the chicken over the egg. Anarchy is a "method of individualization." It aims to combine the greatest individual development with the greatest communal unity".</ref> seeing anarcho-communism as the best [[social system]] for the realization of individual freedom.<ref name="Communism and Anarchy">[[Peter Kropotkin|Kropotkin, Peter]] (1901). [http://www.revoltlib.com/?id=141 "Communism and Anarchy"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023194643/http://www.revoltlib.com/%3Fid%3D141 |date=2021-10-23 }}. "Communism is the one which guarantees the greatest amount of individual liberty — provided that the idea that begets the community be Liberty, Anarchy [...]. Communism guarantees economic freedom better than any other form of association, because it can guarantee wellbeing, even luxury, in return for a few hours of work instead of a day's work."; [[Dielo Truda|Truda, Dielo]] (1926). [http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Dielo_Truda__Workers__Cause___Organisational_Platform_of_the_Libertarian_Communists.html "Organisational Platform of the Libertarian Communists"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728092719/http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Dielo_Truda__Workers__Cause___Organisational_Platform_of_the_Libertarian_Communists.html |date=2011-07-28 }}. "This other society will be libertarian communism, in which social solidarity and free individuality find their full expression, and in which these two ideas develop in perfect harmony."; [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/various-authors-willful-disobedience-volume-2-number-12#toc18 "My Perspectives"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200415141921/https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/various-authors-willful-disobedience-volume-2-number-12#toc18 |date=2020-04-15 }}. ''Willful Disobedience'' (2: 12). "I see the dichotomies made between individualism and communism, individual revolt and class struggle, the struggle against human exploitation and the exploitation of nature as false dichotomies and feel that those who accept them are impoverishing their own critique and struggle."; [[L. Susan Brown|Brown, L. Susan]] (2002). ''[[The Politics of Individualism]]''. Black Rose Books; [[L. Susan Brown|Brown, L. Susan]] (2 February 2011). [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/l-susan-brown-does-work-really-work "Does Work Really Work?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120613181303/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Petr_Kropotkin__Communism_and_Anarchy.html |date=2012-06-13 }}.</ref> Some anarcho-capitalists claim [[anarcho-capitalism]] is part of the [[individualist anarchist]] tradition, while others disagree and claim individualist anarchism is only part of the socialist movement and part of the libertarian socialist tradition.<ref>McKay, Iain. ''An Anarchist FAQ.'' AK Press. Oakland. 2008. pp 22, 526.</ref> Economically, while [[European individualist anarchists]] are pluralists who advocate [[anarchism without adjectives]] and [[synthesis anarchism]], ranging from [[anarcho-communist]] to mutualist economic types, most [[Individualist anarchism in the United States|American individualist anarchists]] of the 19th century advocated mutualism, a [[libertarian socialist]] form of [[market socialism]], or a [[free-market socialist]] form of [[classical economics]].<ref name="AFAQ"/> Individualist anarchists are opposed to property that violates the [[Entitlement theory|entitlement theory of justice]], that is, gives privilege due to unjust acquisition or exchange, and thus is exploitative,<ref name="AFAQ Appendix">{{cite book|title=An Anarchist FAQ|publisher=AK Press|year=2012|isbn=9781849351225|editor-last=McKay|editor-first=Iain|volume=I/II|location=Stirling|chapter=Appendix: Anarchism and 'anarcho'-capitalism|orig-year=2008}}</ref> seeking to "destroy the tyranny of capital,—that is, of property" by [[mutual credit]].<ref>Dana, Charles Anderson. ''Proudhon and his "Bank of the People"''. p. 46.</ref>

Individualist anarchism represents a group of several traditions of thought and [[individualist]] philosophies within the [[anarchist movement]]. Among the early influences on individualist anarchism were [[William Godwin]] ([[philosophical anarchism]]),<ref name="godwinsep">{{cite SEP |url-id=godwin |title=William Godwin |last=Philip  |first=Mark|date=2006-05-20}}</ref> [[Josiah Warren]] ([[sovereignty of the individual]]), [[Max Stirner]] ([[Egoist anarchism|egoism]]),<ref name="stirnersep">{{cite SEP |url-id=max-stirner |title=Max Stirner |last=Leopold |first=David|date=2006-08-04}}</ref> [[Lysander Spooner]] ([[natural law]]), [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]] ([[Mutualism (economic theory)|mutualism]]), [[Henry David Thoreau]] ([[transcendentalism]]),<ref name="thoreau">"Paralelamente, al otro lado del atlántico, en el diferente contexto de una nación a medio hacer, los Estados Unidos, otros filósofos elaboraron un pensamiento individualista similar, aunque con sus propias especificidades. Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862), uno de los escritores próximos al movimiento de la filosofía trascendentalista, es uno de los más conocidos. Su obra más representativa es Walden, aparecida en 1854, aunque redactada entre 1845 y 1847, cuando Thoreau decide instalarse en el aislamiento de una cabaña en el bosque, y vivir en íntimo contacto con la naturaleza, en una vida de soledad y sobriedad. De esta experiencia, su filosofía trata de transmitirnos la idea que resulta necesario un retorno respetuoso a la naturaleza, y que la felicidad es sobre todo fruto de la riqueza interior y de la armonía de los individuos con el entorno natural. Muchos han visto en Thoreau a uno de los precursores del ecologismo y del anarquismo primitivista representado en la actualidad por Jonh Zerzan. Para George Woodcock, esta actitud puede estar también motivada por una cierta idea de resistencia al progreso y de rechazo al materialismo creciente que caracteriza la sociedad norteamericana de mediados de siglo XIX."[http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf "Voluntary non-submission. Spanish individualist anarchism during dictatorship and the second republic (1923–1938)"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |date=July 23, 2011 }}</ref> [[Herbert Spencer]] ([[law of equal liberty]])<ref name="Freeden, Michael pp. 313–314">Freeden, Michael. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-829414-X}}. pp. 313–314</ref> and [[Anselme Bellegarrigue]] ([[civil disobedience]]).<ref>[[George Woodcock]], ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements.'' 1962</ref> From there, individualist anarchism expanded through Europe and the United States, where prominent 19th-century individualist anarchist [[Benjamin Tucker]] held that "if the individual has the right to govern himself, all external government is tyranny".<ref name="Tucker state">{{cite journal|author-link=Benjamin R. Tucker|last=Tucker|first=Benjamin|title=State Socialism and Anarchism: How far they agree and wherein they differ|url=http://praxeology.net/BT-SSA.htm|journal=Liberty|volume=5|issue=120|date=March 10, 1888|pages=2–3, 6|access-date=April 7, 2009|archive-date=February 6, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220206121500/https://praxeology.net/BT-SSA.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>

Within anarchism, individualist anarchism is primarily a literary phenomenon<ref>[[Alexandre Skirda|Skirda, Alexandre]] (2002). ''Facing the Enemy: A History of Anarchist Organization from Proudhon to May 1968''. AK Press. p. 191.</ref> while social anarchism has been the dominant form of anarchism,<ref name="Jennings 1993">Jennings, Jeremy (1993). "Anarchism". In Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (eds.). ''Contemporary Political Ideologies''. London: Pinter. pp. 127–146. {{ISBN|978-0-86187-096-7}}. "[...] anarchism does not stand for the untrammelled freedom of the individual (as the 'anarcho-capitalists' appear to believe) but, as we have already seen, for the extension of individuality ''and'' community" (p. 143).</ref><ref name="Gay & Gay 1999">Gay, Kathlyn; Gay, Martin (1999). ''Encyclopedia of Political Anarchy''. ABC-CLIO. p. 15. {{ISBN|978-0-87436-982-3}}. "For many anarchists (of whatever persuasion), anarcho-capitalism is a contradictory term, since 'traditional' anarchists oppose capitalism".</ref><ref name="Morriss 2008">Morriss, Andrew (2008). "Anarcho-capitalism". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). ''The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism''. SAGE; Cato Institute. pp. 13–14. {{doi|10.4135/9781412965811.n8}}. {{ISBN|978-1-4129-6580-4}}. {{OCLC|191924853}}. "Social anarchists, those anarchists with communitarian leanings, are critical of anarcho-capitalism because it permits individuals to accumulate substantial power through markets and private property."</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Franks|first=Benjamin|date=August 2013|editor-last1=Freeden|editor-first1=Michael|editor-last2=Stears|editor-first2=Marc|title=Anarchism|journal=The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies|publisher=Oxford University Press|pages=393–394|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0001|quote=Individualisms that defend or reinforce hierarchical forms such as the economic-power relations of anarcho-capitalism [...] are incompatible with practices of social anarchism. [...] Increasingly, academic analysis has followed activist currents in rejecting the view that anarcho-capitalism has anything to do with social anarchism.}}</ref> emerging in the late 19th century as a distinction from ''individualist anarchism'' after anarcho-communism replaced [[collectivist anarchism]] as the dominant tendency.<ref>{{cite book|editor-last=McKay|editor-first=Iain|year=2012|title=An Anarchist FAQ|volume=II|location=Stirling|publisher=AK Press|isbn=9781849351225|quote=No, far from it. Most anarchists in the late nineteenth century recognised communist-anarchism as a genuine form of anarchism and it quickly replaced collectivist anarchism as the dominant tendency. So few anarchists found the individualist solution to the social question or the attempts of some of them to excommunicate social anarchism from the movement convincing.}}</ref> Individualist anarchism has been described by some as the anarchist branch most influenced by and tied to [[liberalism]] (the [[classical liberalism]] deriving [[anti-capitalist]] notions and [[socialist economics]] from classical [[political economists]] and the [[labor theory of value]]) as well as being described as a part of the liberal or liberal-socialist wing—in contrast to the collectivist or communist wing—of anarchism and libertarian socialism.<ref>Boyd, Tony; Harrison, Kevin, eds. (2003). "Marxism and Anarchism". ''Understanding Political Ideas and Movements''. Manchester University Press. p. 251. {{ISBN|9780719061516}}.</ref><ref>{{cite book|editor-last=McKay|editor-first=Iain|year=2012|chapter=Section G – Is Individualist Anarchism Capitalistic?|title=An Anarchist FAQ|volume=II|location=Stirling|publisher=AK Press|isbn=9781849351225}}</ref><ref>Carson, Kevin (2017). "Anarchism and Markets". In Jun, Nathan J. (2017). ''Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy''. BRILL. p. 81. {{ISBN|9789004356894}}.</ref> However most do not agree with this divide as social anarchists including collectivist and communist anarchists regard the individualist anarchists as socialists and [[libertarian socialists]] due to their opposition to capitalist profit, interest, and absentee rent.<ref name="McKay, Iain 2008. pp. 59">McKay, Iain. ''An Anarchist FAQ.'' AK Press. Oakland. 2008. pp. 59.</ref> The very idea of an individualist–socialist divide is also contested as individualist anarchism is largely socialistic<ref>Martin, James J. (1953). ''Men Against the State: the State the Expositors of Individualist Anarchism''. Dekalb, Illinois: The Adrian Allen Associates.</ref><ref>Tucker, Benjamin (1970). ''Liberty''. Greenwood Reprint Corporation. '''7–8'''. p. 26. "''Liberty'' has always insisted that Individualism and Socialism are not antithetical terms; that, on the contrary, the most ... not of Socialist Anarchism against Individualist Anarchism, but of Communist Socialism against Individualist Socialism."</ref><ref name="Franks 2013">{{cite journal|last=Franks|first=Benjamin|date=August 2013|editor-last1=Freeden|editor-first1=Michael|editor-last2=Stears|editor-first2=Marc|title=Anarchism|journal=The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies|publisher=Oxford University Press|pages=385–404|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0001}}</ref> and can be considered a form of [[individualist socialism]], with non-Lockean individualism encompassing socialism.<ref>Wood, Ellen Meiksins (1972). ''Mind and Politics: An Approach to the Meaning of Liberal and Socialist Individualism''. University of California Press. p. 7. {{ISBN|0520020294}}.</ref> Individualist anarchism is the basis of most anarchist schools of thought, influencing nearly all anarchist tendencies and having contributed to much of anarchist discourse.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bf01/113c3fe9059d59b9e4ea37f48cbe3747cae9.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190303000808/http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bf01/113c3fe9059d59b9e4ea37f48cbe3747cae9.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-date=2019-03-03|s2cid=35607336|doi=10.5860/choice.44-5863|title=21st century dissent: Anarchism, anti-globalization and environmentalism|journal=Choice Reviews Online|year=2007|volume=44|issue=10|pages=44–5863|hdl=10072/12679|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/487673|jstor=487673|title=Anarchism, Expressionism and Psychoanalysis|last=Mitzman|first=Arthur|journal=New German Critique|year=1977|issue=10|pages=77–104|doi=10.2307/487673}}</ref>
{{TOC limit|limit=4}}

== Overview ==
{{Over-quotation|date=August 2023|section=yes}}
The term ''individualist anarchism'' is often used as a classificatory term, but in very different ways. Some such as the authors of ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]'' use the classification individualist anarchism/[[social anarchism]].<ref name="AFAQ"/> Others such as [[Geoffrey Ostergaard]], who see individualist anarchism as distinctly non-socialist, recognizing [[anarcho-capitalist]] as part of the individualist anarchist tradition, use the classification individualist anarchism/socialist anarchism accordingly.<ref name="Ostergaard">[[Geoffrey Ostergaard|Ostergaard, Geoffrey]]. "Anarchism". ''The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought''. Blackwell Publishing. p. 14.</ref> However, others do not consider anarcho-capitalism as part of the [[anarchist movement]], arguing that anarchism has historically been an anti-capitalist movement and anarchists reject that it is compatible with [[capitalism]].<ref>Sabatini, Peter (Fall/Winter 1994–1995). [http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-sabatini-libertarianism-bogus-anarchy "Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200807055624/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-sabatini-libertarianism-bogus-anarchy/ |date=2020-08-07 }}. ''[[Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed]]'' (41). "Within Libertarianism, Rothbard represents a minority perspective that actually argues for the total elimination of the state. However Rothbard's claim as an anarchist is quickly voided when it is shown that he only wants an end to the public state. In its place he allows countless private states, with each person supplying their own police force, army, and law, or else purchasing these services from capitalist venders...so what remains is shrill anti-statism conjoined to a vacuous freedom in hackneyed defense of capitalism. In sum, the "anarchy" of Libertarianism reduces to a liberal fraud".</ref><ref>Meltzer, Albert (2000). [https://archive.org/details/anarchism00albe ''Anarchism: Arguments For and Against'']. AK Press. p. 50. "The philosophy of "anarcho-capitalism" dreamed up by the "libertarian" New Right, has nothing to do with Anarchism as known by the Anarchist movement proper".</ref><ref>Goodway, David (2006). ''[[Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow: Left-Libertarian Thought and British Writers from William Morris to Colin Ward]]''. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. p. 4. "'Libertarian' and 'libertarianism' are frequently employed by anarchists as synonyms for 'anarchist' and 'anarchism', largely as an attempt to distance themselves from the negative connotations of 'anarchy' and its derivatives. The situation has been vastly complicated in recent decades with the rise of anarcho-capitalism, 'minimal statism' and an extreme right-wing laissez-faire philosophy advocated by such theorists as Murray Rothbard and Robert Nozick and their adoption of the words 'libertarian' and 'libertarianism'. It has therefore now become necessary to distinguish between their right libertarianism and the left libertarianism of the anarchist tradition".</ref><ref>Marshall, Peter (2008). ''[[Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism]]''. London: Harper Perennial. p. 565. "In fact, few anarchists would accept the 'anarcho-capitalists' into the anarchist camp since they do not share a concern for economic equality and social justice, Their self-interested, calculating market men would be incapable of practising voluntary co-operation and mutual aid. Anarcho-capitalists, even if they do reject the State, might therefore best be called right-wing libertarians rather than anarchists".</ref><ref>[http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secFcon.html "Section F – Is "anarcho"-capitalism a type of anarchism?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190909065550/http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secFcon.html |date=2019-09-09 }}. ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]'' (2008). Published in physical book form by "An Anarchist FAQ" as Volume I. Oakland/Edinburgh: AK Press. 558 pp. {{ISBN|9781902593906}}.</ref><ref>Newman, Saul (2010). [https://books.google.com/books?id=SiqBiViUsOkC&q=anarcho-capitalism+right+libertarian&pg=PA43 ''The Politics of Postanarchism, Edinburgh University Press'']. p. 43. {{ISBN|0748634959}}. "It is important to distinguish between anarchism and certain strands of right-wing libertarianism which at times go by the same name (for example, Murray Rothbard's anarcho-capitalism)".</ref> In addition, an analysis of several individualist anarchists who advocated free-market anarchism shows that it is different from anarcho-capitalism and other capitalist theories due to these individualist anarchists retaining the [[labor theory of value]] and [[Socialist economics|socialist doctrines]].<ref>Rothbard, Murray. [http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard167.html "Are Libertarians 'Anarchists'?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170113130534/http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard167.html |date=2017-01-13 }}. Lew Rockwell.com. Retrieved 1 April 2020.</ref><ref name="Franks 2013"/><ref name="Adams & Levy 2018"/> Other classifications include communal/mutualist anarchism.<ref>[[Kevin Carson|Carson, Kevin]], [http://www.mutualist.org/id24.html "A Mutualist FAQ"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070718061309/http://www.mutualist.org/id24.html |date=2007-07-18 }}.</ref> Michael Freeden identifies four broad types of individualist anarchism. Freeden says the first is the type associated with [[William Godwin]] that advocates [[self-government]] with a "progressive [[rationalism]] that included benevolence to others". The second type is the amoral self-serving rationality of [[Egoist anarchism|egoism]] as most associated with [[Max Stirner]]. The third type is "found in [[Herbert Spencer]]'s early predictions, and in that of some of his disciples such as [[Wordsworth Donisthorpe]], foreseeing the redundancy of the state in the source of social evolution". The fourth type retains a moderated form of egoism and accounts for social cooperation through the advocacy of market relationships.<ref name="Freeden, Michael pp. 313–314"/> Individualist anarchism of different kinds have the following things in common:
# The concentration on the [[individual]] and their will in preference to any construction such as morality, ideology, social custom, religion, metaphysics, ideas or the will of others.<ref name="individualism">"En la vida de todo único, todo vínculo, independientemente de la forma en que éste se presente, supone una cadena que condiciona, y por tanto elimina la condición de persona libre. Ello supone dos consecuencias; la libertad se mantendrá al margen de toda categoría moral. Este último concepto quedará al margen del vocabulario estirneriano, puesto que tanto ética como moral serán dos conceptos absolutos que, como tales, no pueden situarse por encima de la voluntad individual. La libertad se vive siempre al margen de cualquier condicionamiento material o espiritual, "más allá del bien y del mal" como enunciará Nietzsche en una de sus principales obras. Las creencias colectivas, los prejuicios compartidos, los convencionalismos sociales serán, pues, objeto de destrucción."[http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf "Voluntary non-submission. Spanish individualist anarchism during dictatorship and the second republic (1923–1938)"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |date=July 23, 2011 }}</ref><ref name="individualism2">"Stirner himself, however, has no truck with "higher beings." Indeed, with the aim of concerning himself purely with his own interests, he attacks all "higher beings," regarding them as a variety of what he calls "spooks," or ideas to which individuals sacrifice themselves and by which they are dominated. First amongst these is the abstraction "Man", into which all unique individuals are submerged and lost. As he put it, "liberalism is a religion because it separates my essence from me and sets it above me, because it exalts 'Man' to the same extent as any other religion does to God ... it sets me beneath Man." Indeed, he "who is infatuated with Man leaves persons out of account so far as that infatuation extends, and floats in an ideal, sacred interest. Man, you see, is not a person, but an ideal, a spook." [p. 176 and p. 79] Among the many "spooks" Stirner attacks are such notable aspects of capitalist life as private property, the division of labour, the state, religion, and (at times) society itself. We will discuss Stirner's critique of capitalism before moving onto his vision of an egoist society and how it relates to social anarchism. [http://www.infoshop.org/page/AnarchistFAQSectionG6 "G.6 What are the ideas of Max Stirner"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123154932/http://www.infoshop.org/page/AnarchistFAQSectionG6|date=November 23, 2010}} in [[An Anarchist FAQ]]</ref>
# The rejection of or reservations about the idea of revolution, seeing it as a time of mass uprising which could bring about new hierarchies. Instead, they favor more [[evolutionary]] methods of bringing about anarchy through alternative experiences and experiments and education which could be brought about [[Immediatism|today]].<ref name="evolutionary">"The first is in regard to the means of action in the here and now (and so the manner in which anarchy will come about). Individualists generally prefer education and the creation of alternative institutions, such as mutual banks, unions, communes, etc. Such activity, they argue, will ensure that present society will gradually develop out of government into an anarchist one. They are primarily evolutionists, not revolutionists, and dislike social anarchists' use of direct action to create revolutionary situations."[http://www.infoshop.org/page/AnarchistFAQSectionA3#seca31 "A.3.1 What are the differences between individualist and social anarchists?"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101123103313/http://www.infoshop.org/page/AnarchistFAQSectionA3|date=2010-11-23}} in [[An Anarchist FAQ]]</ref><ref name="evolution2">"Toda revolución, pues, hecha en nombre de principios abstractos como igualdad, fraternidad, libertad o humanidad, persigue el mismo fin; anular la voluntad y soberanía del individuo, para así poderlo dominar."[http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf La insumisión voluntaria. El anarquismo individualista español durante la dictadura y la segunda república (1923–1938)] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |date=July 23, 2011 }}</ref> This is also because it is not seen as desirable for individuals to wait for revolution to start experiencing alternative experiences outside what is offered in the current social system.<ref name="illegalists">"The wave of anarchist bombings and assassinations of the 1890s&nbsp;... and the practice of illegalism from the mid-1880s to the start of the First World War&nbsp;... were twin aspects of the same proletarian offensive, but were expressed in an individualist practice, one that complemented the great collective struggles against capital. The illegalist comrades were tired of waiting for the revolution. The acts of the anarchist bombers and assassins ("propaganda by the deed") and the anarchist burglars ("individual reappropriation") expressed their desperation and their personal, violent rejection of an intolerable society. Moreover, they were clearly meant to be exemplary, invitations to revolt."[http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm THE "ILLEGALISTS" by Doug Imrie] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908072801/http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm |date=September 8, 2015 }}</ref>
# Individual experience and exploration is emphasized. The view that relationships with other persons or things can be in one's own interest only and can be as transitory and without compromises as desired since in individualist anarchism sacrifice is usually rejected. In this way, Max Stirner recommended [[Union of egoists|associations of egoists]].<ref name="association">Finalmente, y este es un tema poco resuelto por el filósofo bávaro, resulta evidente que, a pesar de todo culto a la soberanía individual, es necesario y deseable que los individuos cooperen. Pero el peligro de la asociación conlleva la reproducción, an escala diferente, de una sociedad, y es evidente que en este contexto, los individuos deban renunciar a buena parte de su soberanía. Stirner propone "uniones de egoístas", formadas por individuos libres que pueden unirse episódicamente para colaborar, pero evitando la estabilidad o la permanencia."[http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf La insumisión voluntaria. El anarquismo individualista español durante la dictadura y la segunda república (1923–1938)] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |date=July 23, 2011 }}</ref><ref name="association2">"The unions Stirner desires would be based on free agreement, being spontaneous and voluntary associations drawn together out of the mutual interests of those involved, who would "care best for their welfare if they unite with others." [p.&nbsp;309] The unions, unlike the state, exist to ensure what Stirner calls "intercourse," or "union" between individuals. To better understand the nature of these associations, which will replace the state, Stirner lists the relationships between friends, lovers, and children at play as examples. [No Gods, No Masters, vol. 1, p.&nbsp;25] These illustrate the kinds of relationships that maximise an individual's self-enjoyment, pleasure, freedom, and individuality, as well as ensuring that those involved sacrifice nothing while belonging to them. Such associations are based on mutuality and a free and spontaneous co-operation between equals. As Stirner puts it, "intercourse is mutuality, it is the action, the commercium, of individuals." [p.&nbsp;218] Its aim is "pleasure" and "self-enjoyment." Thus Stirner sought a broad egoism, one which appreciated others and their uniqueness, and so criticised the narrow egoism of people who forgot the wealth others are:
:"But that would be a man who does not know and cannot appreciate any of the delights emanating from an interest taken in others, from the consideration shown to others. That would be a man bereft of innumerable pleasures, a wretched character&nbsp;... would he not be a wretched egoist, rather than a genuine Egoist?&nbsp;... The person who loves a human being is, by virtue of that love, a wealthier man that someone else who loves no one." [No Gods, No Masters, vol. 1, p. 23]"[https://web.archive.org/web/19991008043031/http://geocities.com/CapitolHill/1931/secG6.html What are the differences between individualist and social anarchists?]</ref>

Individualists anarchists considered themselves to be [[socialists]] and part of the [[socialist movement]] which according to those anarchists was divided in two wings, namely anarchist socialism and [[state socialism]].<ref>Martin, James J. (1953). [https://mises.org/library/men-against-state-expositers-individualist-anarchism-america-1827-1908 ''Men Against the State: The Expositers of Individualist Anarchism in America, 1827–1908''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201204172944/https://mises.org/library/men-against-state-expositers-individualist-anarchism-america-1827-1908 |date=2020-12-04 }}. Auburn: Mises Institute. {{ISBN|9781610163910}}.</ref><ref>Martin, James J. (1970). ''Men Against the State''. Colorado Springs: Ralph Myles Publisher. pp. viii, ix, 209. {{ISBN|9780879260064}}</ref> [[Benjamin Tucker]] criticized those who were trying to exclude individualist anarchism from socialism based on dictionary's definitions.<ref>Tucker, Benjamin. ''Instead of a Book''. p. 369 "The makers of dictionaries are dependent upon specialists for their definitions. A specialist's definition may be true or it may be erroneous. But its truth cannot be increased or its error diminished by its acceptance by the lexicographer. Each definition must stand on its own merits."</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}} Tucker held that the mutualist title to land and other scarce resources would involve a radical change and restriction of [[capitalist]] [[Property rights (economics)|property rights]].<ref name="AFAQ Appendix"/><ref>Tucker, Benjamin. ''Instead of a Book''. p. 61. "It will be seen from this definition that Anarchistic property concerns only products. But anything is a product upon which human labour has been expended. It should be stated, however, that in the case of land, or of any other material the supply of which is so limited that all cannot hold it in unlimited quantities, Anarchism undertakes to protect no titles except such as are based on actual occupancy and use."</ref><ref>Martin, James J. ''Men Against the State.'' Ralph Myles Publisher Inc.: Colorado. 1970. pp.210. “Ground-rent exists only because the State stands by to collect it and to protect land titles rooted in force or fraud. Otherwise land would be free to all, and no one could control more than he used..”</ref><ref>Tucker, Benjamin. "Occupancy and Use versus the Single Tax". "[N]o advocate of occupancy and use believes that it can be put in force until as a theory it has been accepted as generally [...] seen and accepted as is the prevailing theory of ordinary private property."</ref><ref>Martin, James J. ''Men Against the State.'' Ralph Myles Publisher Inc.: Colorado. 1970. pp.210.</ref> It should also be noted social anarchists including collectivist and communist anarchists regard the individualist anarchists as socialists due to their opposition to surplus-value,<ref>Martin, James J. ''Men Against the State.'' Ralph Myles Publisher Inc.: Colorado. 1970. pp.208. “‘Somebody gets the surplus wealth that Labor produces and does not consume. Who is that somebody?’”</ref> something even Karl Marx (whom Tucker was influenced by <ref>Tucker, Benjamin. ''Instead of a Book.'' Forgotten Books. 2012. pp. 477.</ref><ref>Martin, James J. ''Men Against the State.'' Ralph Myles Publisher Inc.: Colorado. 1970. pp.228. “One prominent example was his treatment of Karl Marx…following his death, Tucker declared that ‘the cause of labor has lost one of the most faithful friends it ever had,…’ and to ‘…hold his memory in respect.’”</ref>would agree is anti-capitalist.)<ref name="McKay, Iain 2008. pp. 59"/><ref>Marx, Karl. ''Capital Volume 1.'' Penguin Classics. England. 1990. pp. 676.

"The working day of 12 hours is represented in a monetary value of, for example, 6 shillings. There are two alternatives. Either equivalents are exchanged, and then the worker received 6 shillings for 12 hours of labour; the price of his labour would be equal to the price of his product. In that case he produces no surplus-value for the buyer of his labor, the 6 shillings are not transformed into capital, and the basis of capitalist production vanishes."</ref><ref>Chartier, Gary. ''Anarchy and Legal Order.'' Cambridge University Press: New York. 2013. pp.401.“Tucker makes clear why he sees Josiah Warren, P. J. Proudhon, and Karl Marx as socialists sharing a commitment to the liberation of labor…The key socialist idea…is that ‘labor is the true measure of price’.”</ref>

Individualist anarchists such as Tucker argued that it was "not Socialist Anarchism against Individualist Anarchism, but of Communist Socialism against Individualist Socialism".<ref>Tucker, Benjamin. ''Liberty'' (129). p. 2.</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}} Tucker further noted that "the fact that State Socialism has overshadowed other forms of Socialism gives it no right to a monopoly of the Socialistic idea".<ref>Tucker, Benjamin (1893). ''Instead of a Book by a Man Too Busy to Write One''. pp. 363–364.</ref><ref>Martin, James J. ''Men Against the State.'' Ralph Myles Publisher Inc.: Colorado. 1970. pp.228. “Convinced that the labor unions and labor press were exaggerating the importance of Marx as the originator of the economic principles on which all brands of socialism, including the anarchist variety were based…”</ref> In 1888, Tucker, who proclaimed himself to be an anarchistic socialist<ref>Chartier, Gary. ''Anarchy and Legal Order.'' Cambridge University Press: New York. 2013. pp. 399. “Tucker explicitly embraced ‘anarchistic socialism’…”</ref> in opposition to state socialism, included the full text of a "Socialistic Letter" by [[Ernest Lesigne]] in his essay "State Socialism and Anarchism".<ref>Tucker, Benjamin (1911) [1888]. ''State Socialism and Anarchism: How Far They Agree and Wherein They Differ''. Fifield.</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}} Tucker's two socialisms were the state socialism which he associated to the Marxist school and the [[libertarian socialism]] that he advocated. What those two schools of socialism had in common was the [[labor theory of value]] and the ends, by which [[anarchism]] pursued different means.<ref>Brown, Susan Love (1997). "The Free Market as Salvation from Government". In Carrier, James G., ed. ''Meanings of the Market: The Free Market in Western Culture''. Berg Publishers. p. 107. {{ISBN|9781859731499}}.</ref>

According to [[Rudolf Rocker]], individualist anarchists "all agree on the point that man be given the full reward of his labour and recognised in this right the economic basis of all personal liberty. They regard free competition [...] as something inherent in human nature. [...] They answered the socialists of other schools who saw in free competition one of the destructive elements of capitalistic society that the evil lies in the fact that today we have too little rather than too much competition".<ref name="AFAQ Appendix"/> Individualist anarchist [[Joseph Labadie]] wrote that both "the two great sub-divisions of Socialists [Anarchists and State Socialists] agree that the resources of nature—land, mines, and so forth—should not be held as private property and subject to being held by the individual for speculative purposes, that use of these things shall be the only valid title, and that each person has an equal right to the use of all these things. They all agree that the present social system is one composed of a class of slaves and a class of masters, and that justice is impossible under such conditions".<ref name="AFAQ Appendix"/> The [[Egoist anarchism|egoist]] form of individualist anarchism, derived from the [[philosophy of Max Stirner]], supports the individual doing exactly what he pleases—taking no notice of God, state, or moral rules.<ref>{{cite book|last=Miller |first=David |title=The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought |year=1987 |publisher=Blackwell Publishing |page=11|isbn=0631227814}}</ref> To Stirner, rights were ''[[Reification (fallacy)|spooks]]'' in the mind, and he held that society does not exist but "the individuals are its reality"—he supported property by force of might rather than moral right.<ref>"What my might reaches is my property; and let me claim as property everything I feel myself strong enough to attain, and let me extend my actual property as fas as ''I'' entitle, that is, empower myself to take..." From ''[[The Ego and Its Own]]'', quoted in {{cite book|last=Ossar |first=Michael |year=1980 |title=Anarchism in the Dramas of Ernst Toller |publisher=[[State University of New York Press]] |page=27|isbn=0873953932}}</ref> Stirner advocated self-assertion and foresaw "associations of egoists" drawn together by respect for each other's ruthlessness.<ref>{{cite book|author-link=George Woodcock|last=Woodcock |first=George |year=2004 |title=Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements |publisher=Broadview Press |page=20|isbn=0140206221}}</ref>

[[File:Liberty OldPeriodical.jpg|thumb|left|300px|''[[Liberty (1881–1908)|Liberty]]'', [[American individualist anarchist]] publication edited by [[Benjamin Tucker]]]]
For historian Eunice Minette Schuster, [[American individualist anarchism]] "stresses the isolation of the individual—his right to his own tools, his mind, his body, and to the products of his labor. To the artist who embraces this philosophy it is "[[aesthetic]]" anarchism, to the reformer, ethical anarchism, to the independent mechanic, economic anarchism. The former is concerned with philosophy, the latter with practical demonstration. The economic anarchist is concerned with constructing a society on the basis of anarchism. Economically he sees no harm whatever in the private possession of what the individual produces by his own labor, but only so much and no more. The aesthetic and ethical type found expression in the [[transcendentalism]], [[humanitarianism]], and [[Romanticism]] of the first part of the nineteenth century, the economic type in the pioneer life of the West during the same period, but more favorably after the Civil War".<ref>[http://www.againstallauthority.org/NativeAmericanAnarchism.html ''NATIVE AMERICAN ANARCHISM A Study of Left-Wing American Individualism'' by Eunice Minette Schuster] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160213201445/http://www.againstallauthority.org/NativeAmericanAnarchism.html |date=February 13, 2016 }}</ref>

For this reason, it has been suggested that in order to understand individualist anarchism one must take into account "the social context of their ideas, namely the transformation of America from a pre-capitalist to a capitalist society [...] the non-capitalist nature of the early U.S. can be seen from the early dominance of self-employment (artisan and peasant production). At the beginning of the 19th century, around 80% of the working (non-slave) male population were self-employed. The great majority of Americans during this time were farmers working their own land, primarily for their own needs" and "[i]ndividualist anarchism is clearly a form of [[artisan]]al socialism [...] while [[communist anarchism]] and [[anarcho-syndicalism]] are forms of industrial (or [[proletarian]]) socialism".<ref>[http://www.infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionG1#secg14 "G.1.4 Why is the social context important in evaluating Individualist Anarchism?"] in ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]''</ref>

''[[Liberty (1881–1908)|Liberty]]'' insisted on "the abolition of the State and the abolition of usury; on no more government of man by man, and no more exploitation of man by man"<ref>Schuster, Eunice. ''Native American Anarchism — A Study of Left-Wing American Individualism''. p. 140.</ref> and anarchism is "the abolition of the State and the abolition of usury".<ref>Kilne, William Gary (1987). ''The Individualist Anarchists: A Critique of Liberalism''. University Press of America. p. 57.</ref> Those anarchists held that there were "two schools of Socialistic thought, [...] State Socialism and Anarchism" and "liberty insists on Socialism [...]—true Socialism, Anarchistic Socialism: the prevalence on earth of Liberty, Equality, and Solidarity". Individualist anarchists followed Proudhon and other anarchists that "exploitation of man by man and the domination of man over man are inseparable, and each is the condition of the other", that "the bottom claim of Socialism" was "that labour should be put in possession of its own", that "the natural wage of labour is its product" in an "effort to abolish the exploitation of labour by capital" and that anarchists "do not admit the government of man by man any more than the exploitation of man by man", advocating "the complete destruction of the domination and exploitation of man by man".<ref name="AFAQ Appendix"/> Contemporary individualist anarchist [[Kevin Carson]] characterizes American individualist anarchism by saying that "[u]nlike the rest of the socialist movement, the individualist anarchists believed that the natural wage of labor in a free market was its product, and that economic exploitation could only take place when capitalists and landlords harnessed the power of the state in their interests. Thus, individualist anarchism was an alternative both to the increasing statism of the mainstream socialist movement, and to a [[classical liberal]] movement that was moving toward a mere apologetic for the power of [[big business]]".<ref>Kevin Carson. ''Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective''. BOOKSURGE. 2008. p. 1</ref>

[[File:L'anarchie (1907).png|thumb|''[[L'Anarchie]]'', [[Individualist anarchism in France|French individualist anarchist]] journal established in April 1905 by [[Albert Libertad]]]]
In [[European individualist anarchism]], a different social context helped the rise of European individualist [[illegalism]] and as such "[t]he illegalists were proletarians who had nothing to sell but their labour power, and nothing to discard but their dignity; if they disdained waged-work, it was because of its compulsive nature. If they turned to illegality it was due to the fact that honest toil only benefited the employers and often entailed a complete loss of dignity, while any complaints resulted in the sack; to avoid starvation through lack of work it was necessary to beg or steal, and to avoid conscription into the army many of them had to go on the run".<ref name="archive.org">[https://archive.org/download/bonnot_gang/bonnotgangfull.pdf Richard Parry. ''The Bonnot Gang: The Story of the French Illegalists'']</ref> A European tendency of individualist anarchism advocated violent individual acts of [[individual reclamation]], [[propaganda by the deed]] and criticism of organization. Such individualist anarchist tendencies include French illegalism<ref name="The Illegalists">[http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm The "Illegalists"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908072801/http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm|date=September 8, 2015}}, by Doug Imrie (published by [[Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed]])</ref><ref name="Parry, Richard 1987. p. 15">Parry, Richard. The Bonnot Gang. Rebel Press, 1987. p. 15</ref> and Italian anti-organizational [[Insurrectionary anarchism#19th century|insurrectionarism]].<ref>"Anarchist historian [[George Woodcock]] reports the incident in which the important Italian [[social anarchist]] [[Errico Malatesta]] became involved "in a dispute with the individualist anarchists of [[Paterson, New Jersey|Paterson]], who insisted that anarchism implied no organization at all, and that every man must act solely on his impulses. At last, in one noisy debate, the individual impulse of a certain Ciancabilla directed him to shoot Malatesta, who was badly wounded but obstinately refused to name his assailant." Woodcock, George. ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements.'' 1962</ref> Bookchin reports that at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th "it was in times of severe social repression and deadening social quiescence that individualist anarchists came to the foreground of libertarian activity—and then primarily as terrorists. In France, Spain, and the United States, individualistic anarchists committed acts of terrorism that gave anarchism its reputation as a violently sinister conspiracy".<ref>[http://libcom.org/library/socanlifean2 Murray Bookchin] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200418210801/http://libcom.org/library/socanlifean2 |date=2020-04-18 }}. ''[[Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism: An Unbridgeable Chasm]]'']</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}}

Another important tendency within individualist anarchist currents emphasizes individual subjective exploration and defiance of social conventions. Individualist anarchist philosophy attracted "amongst artists, intellectuals and the well-read, urban middle classes in general".<ref name="archive.org"/> [[Murray Bookchin]] describes a lot of individualist anarchism as people who "expressed their opposition in uniquely personal forms, especially in fiery tracts, outrageous behavior and aberrant lifestyles in the cultural ghettos of fin de siecle New York, Paris and London. As a credo, individualist anarchism remained largely a [[bohemian lifestyle]], most conspicuous in its demands for sexual freedom ('free love') and enamored of innovations in art, behavior, and clothing".<ref name="bohemian individualism">{{Cite web |url=http://libcom.org/library/socanlifean2 |title="2. Individualist Anarchism and Reaction" in Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism – An Unbridgeable Chasm |access-date=2009-04-29 |archive-date=2020-04-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200418210801/http://libcom.org/library/socanlifean2 |url-status=live }}</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}} In this way, [[free love]]<ref name="freelove"/><ref name="frenchexperimentation"/> currents and other radical lifestyles such as [[naturism]]<ref name="frenchexperimentation"/><ref name="naturismo"/> had popularity among individualist anarchists.

For Catalan historian Xavier Diez, "under its [[iconoclastic]], antiintelectual, [[antitheist]] run, which goes against all sacralized ideas or values it entailed, a philosophy of life which could be considered a reaction against the sacred gods of capitalist society. Against the idea of [[Nationalism|nation]], it opposed its [[Anationalism|internationalism]]. Against the exaltation of authority embodied in the military institution, it opposed its [[antimilitarism]]. Against the concept of [[industrial civilization]], it opposed its [[naturist]] vision".{{sfn|Díez|2007}} In regards to economic questions, there are diverse positions. There are adherents to [[Mutualism (economic theory)|mutualism]] (Proudhon, [[Émile Armand]] and the early Tucker), egoistic disrespect for "ghosts" such as private property and markets (Stirner, [[John Henry Mackay]], [[Lev Chernyi]] and the later Tucker) and adherents to [[anarcho-communism]] ([[Albert Libertad]], [[illegalism]] and [[Renzo Novatore]]).<ref>"revolution is the fire of our will and a need of our solitary minds; it is an obligation of the libertarian aristocracy. To create new ethical values. To create new aesthetic values. To communalize material wealth. To individualize spiritual wealth." [http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Renzo_Novatore__Toward_the_Creative_Nothing.htm ''Towards the creative nothing''] {{webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20130415220552/http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Renzo_Novatore__Toward_the_Creative_Nothing.htm |date=2013-04-15 }} by [[Renzo Novatore]]</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}} Anarchist historian [[George Woodcock]] finds a tendency in individualist anarchism of a "distrust (of) all co-operation beyond the barest minimum for an [[Simple living|ascetic life]]".<ref>George Woodcock. ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements''. 1962</ref> On the issue of violence opinions have gone from a violentist point of view mainly exemplified by [[illegalism]] and [[insurrectionary anarchism]] to one that can be called [[anarcho-pacifist]]. In the particular case of Spanish individualist anarchist [[Miguel Giménez Igualada]], he went from illegalist practice in his youth<ref>"Selon l'historien Vladimir Muñoz, son véritable nom aurait été Miguel Ramos Giménez et il aurait participé au début du 20è siècle aux groupes illégalistes."[http://militants-anarchistes.info/spip.php?article2199&lang=fr "GIMÉNEZ IGUALADA, Miguel" at Diccionaire International des Militants Anarchistes]</ref> towards a pacifist position later in his life.<ref>Igualada argued for an anarchism that was "pacifist, poetic, which creates goodness, harmony and beauty, which cultivates a healthy sense of living in peace, sign of power and fertility&nbsp;... from there anyone which is un-harmonious (violent-warrior), everyone that will pretend, in any form, to dominate anyone of his similars, is not an anarchist, since the anarchist respects in such a way personal integrity, so that he could not make anyone a slave of his thoughts so as to turn him into an instrument of his, a man-tool."[http://www.kclibertaria.comyr.com/lpdf/l125.pdf ''Anarquismo'' by Miguel Giménez Igualada] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170131205417/http://www.kclibertaria.comyr.com/lpdf/l125.pdf |date=2017-01-31 }}</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}}

== Early influences ==
=== William Godwin ===
{{main|William Godwin}}
[[File:WilliamGodwin.jpg|thumb|left|[[William Godwin]], a [[Radicalism (historical)|radical liberal]] and [[utilitarian]], who was one of the first to espouse what became known as individualist anarchism]]
William Godwin can be considered an individualist anarchist<ref name=woodcock20>Woodcock, George. 2004. ''Anarchism: A History Of Libertarian Ideas And Movements''. Broadview Press. p. 20</ref> and [[philosophical anarchist]] who was influenced by the ideas of the [[Age of Enlightenment]],<ref name=Encarta>"Anarchism", ''[[Encarta]] Online Encyclopedia'' 2006 (UK version)</ref> and developed what many consider the first expression of [[anarchist schools of thought|modern anarchist thought]].<ref name="godwinsep"/> According to [[Peter Kropotkin]], Godwin was "the first to formulate the political and economical conceptions of anarchism, even though he did not give that name to the ideas developed in his work".<ref name="EB1910">Peter Kropotkin, [http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/kropotkin/britanniaanarchy.html "Anarchism"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181007001534/http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/kropotkin/britanniaanarchy.html |date=2018-10-07 }}, ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'', 1910</ref> Godwin advocated extreme individualism, proposing that all cooperation in labor be eliminated.<ref name=godwineb>"[http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9037183 Godwin, William] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071016063126/http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9037183 |date=2007-10-16 }}". (2006). In Britannica Concise Encyclopaedia. Retrieved December 7, 2006, from ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' Online.</ref> Godwin was a utilitarian who believed that all individuals are not of equal value, with some of us "of more worth and importance" than others depending on our utility in bringing about social good. Therefore, he does not believe in equal rights, but the person's life that should be favored that is most conducive to the general good.<ref>{{cite book|first=Paul |last=McLaughlin |title=Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism |publisher=Ashgate Publishing |year=2007 |page=119|isbn=978-0754661962}}</ref> Godwin opposed government because it infringes on the individual's right to "private judgement" to determine which actions most maximize utility, but also makes a critique of all authority over the individual's judgement. This aspect of Godwin's philosophy, minus the utilitarianism, was developed into a more extreme form later by Stirner.<ref>{{cite book|first=Paul |last=McLaughlin |title=Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism |publisher=Ashgate Publishing |year=2007 |page=123|isbn=978-0754661962}}</ref>

Godwin took individualism to the radical extent of opposing individuals performing together in orchestras, writing in ''[[Political Justice]]'' that "everything understood by the term co-operation is in some sense an evil".<ref name=godwineb/> The only apparent exception to this opposition to cooperation is the spontaneous association that may arise when a society is threatened by violent force. One reason he opposed cooperation is he believed it to interfere with an individual's ability to be benevolent for the greater good. Godwin opposes the idea of government, but wrote that a [[Limited government|minimal state]] as a present "necessary evil" that would become increasingly irrelevant and powerless by the gradual spread of knowledge.<ref name="godwinsep"/> He believed [[democracy]] to be preferable to other forms of government.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Marshall |first1=Peter |title=[[William Godwin (biography)|William Godwin]] |date=1984 |language=English |isbn=978-0-300-03175-1 |publisher=Yale University Press |location=New Haven |oclc=9971338 |page=106 }}</ref>

[[File:PoliticalJustice3.png|thumb|Title page from the third edition of ''[[Political Justice]]'' by William Godwin]]
Godwin's political views were diverse and do not perfectly agree with any of the ideologies that claim his influence as writers of the ''[[Socialist Standard]]'', organ of the [[Socialist Party of Great Britain]], consider Godwin both an individualist and a communist;<ref name="Godwin">"William Godwin, Shelly and Communism" by ALB, The Socialist Standard</ref> [[Murray Rothbard]] did not regard Godwin as being in the individualist camp at all, referring to him as the "founder of [[communist anarchism]]";<ref name="rothbard/burke">Rothbard, Murray. "[http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard11.html Edmund Burke, Anarchist] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20140112124418/http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard11.html |date=2014-01-12 }}."</ref> and historian [[Albert Weisbord]] considers him an individualist anarchist without reservation.<ref name="conquest8">{{cite book|last=Weisbord|first=Albert|author-link=Albert Weisbord|title=The Conquest of Power|access-date=2008-08-05|year=1937|publisher=Covici-Friede|location=[[New York City|New York]]|oclc=1019295|chapter=Libertarianism|chapter-url=http://www.weisbord.org/conquest8.htm|archive-date=2018-05-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180523121804/http://www.weisbord.org/conquest8.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Some writers see a conflict between Godwin's advocacy of "private judgement" and utilitarianism as he says that ethics requires that individuals give their surplus property to each other resulting in an egalitarian society, but at the same time he insists that all things be left to individual choice.<ref name="godwinsep"/> As noted by Kropotkin, many of Godwin's views changed over time.

[[William Godwin]]'s influenced "the socialism of [[Robert Owen]] and [[Charles Fourier]]. After success of his British venture, Owen himself established a cooperative community within the United States at New Harmony, Indiana during 1825. One member of this commune was [[Josiah Warren]], considered to be the first individualist anarchist. After New Harmony failed, Warren shifted his ideological loyalties from socialism to anarchism. According to anarchist Peter Sabatini, this "was no great leap, given that Owen's socialism had been predicated on Godwin's anarchism".<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Peter_Sabatini__Libertarianism__Bogus_Anarchy.html |title=Peter Sabatini. "Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy" |access-date=2016-01-21 |archive-date=2012-05-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120503100657/http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Peter_Sabatini__Libertarianism__Bogus_Anarchy.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

=== Pierre-Joseph Proudhon ===
{{main|Pierre-Joseph Proudhon}}
[[File:Pierre Joseph Proudhon.jpg|thumb|180px|[[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], the first self-identified anarchist]]
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon was the first philosopher to label himself an "anarchist".<ref name=bbc>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/inourtime_20061207.shtml "Anarchism"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090216180323/http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/inourtime_20061207.shtml |date=2009-02-16 }}, [[BBC Radio 4]] program, [[In Our Time (BBC Radio 4)|In Our Time]], Thursday December 7, 2006. Hosted by [[Melvyn Bragg]] of the BBC, with John Keane, Professor of Politics at [[University of Westminster]], [[Ruth Kinna]], Senior Lecturer in Politics at [[Loughborough University]], and [[Peter Marshall (author)|Peter Marshall]], philosopher and historian.</ref> Some consider Proudhon to be an individualist anarchist<ref name="Encyclopedia Americana">{{cite book |title=Encyclopedia Americana |editor=George Edward Rines |year=1918 |publisher=Encyclopedia Americana Corp. |location=New York |oclc=7308909 |page=624 |title-link=Encyclopedia Americana }}</ref><ref name="Hamilton 1995 79">{{cite book |last=Hamilton |first=Peter |title=Émile Durkheim |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |year=1995 |isbn=0415110475 |page=79}}</ref><ref name="Faguet 1970 147">{{cite book |last=Faguet |first=Émile |title=Politicians & Moralists of the Nineteenth Century |publisher=Books for Libraries Press |location=Freeport |year=1970 |isbn=0836918282 |page=147}}</ref> while others regard him to be a [[social anarchism|social anarchist]].<ref>Bowen, James & Purkis, Jon. 2004. ''Changing Anarchism: Anarchist Theory and Practice in a Global Age''. [[Manchester University Press]]. p. 24</ref><ref>Knowles, Rob. "Political Economy from below : Communitarian Anarchism as a Neglected Discourse in Histories of Economic Thought". ''History of Economics Review'', No.31 Winter 2000.</ref> Some commentators do not identify Proudhon as an individualist anarchist due to his preference for association in large industries, rather than individual control.<ref>Woodcock, George. ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements'', Broadview Press, 2004, p. 20</ref>

=== Max Stirner ===
{{main|Max Stirner}}
[[File:Max stirner.jpg|thumb|Portrait of [[Max Stirner]] by [[Friedrich Engels]]]]
Johann Kaspar Schmidt, better known as Max Stirner (the ''[[nom de plume]]'' he adopted from a schoolyard nickname he had acquired as a child because of his high brow, in German ''Stirn''), was a German [[philosopher]] who ranks as one of the literary fathers of [[nihilism]], [[existentialism]], [[post-modernism]] and [[anarchism]], especially of individualist anarchism. Stirner's main work is ''[[The Ego and Its Own]]'', also known as ''The Ego and His Own'' (''Der Einzige und sein Eigentum'' in German which translates literally as ''The Only One [individual] and his Property'' or ''The Unique Individual and His Property'').<ref>Moggach, Douglas. The New Hegelians. Cambridge University Press. p. 177.</ref> This work was first published in 1844 in [[Leipzig]] and has since appeared in numerous editions and translations.

==== Egoism ====
{{main|Egoist anarchism|Philosophy of Max Stirner}}
{{see also|Ethical egoism|Moral nihilism}}
[[Max Stirner]]'s philosophy, sometimes called egoism, is a form of individualist anarchism.<ref>{{cite book|author-link=David Goodway|last=Goodway |first=David |title=Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow |publisher=Liverpool University Press |year=2006 |page=[https://archive.org/details/anarchistseedsbe00good/page/n111 99]|isbn=1846310261|title-link=Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow }}</ref> Stirner was a [[Young Hegelians|Hegelian]] philosopher whose "name appears with familiar regularity in historically oriented surveys of anarchist thought as one of the earliest and best-known exponents of individualist anarchism".<ref name=stirnersep/> In 1844, Stirner's work ''[[The Ego and Its Own]]'' was published and is considered to be "a founding text in the tradition of individualist anarchism".<ref name=stirnersep/> Stirner does not recommend that the individual try to eliminate the state, but simply that they disregard the state when it conflicts with one's autonomous choices and go along with it when doing so is conducive to one's interests.<ref>Moggach, Douglas. The New Hegelians. Cambridge University Press, 2006 p. 190.</ref> Stirner says that the egoist rejects pursuit of devotion to "a great idea, a good cause, a doctrine, a system, a lofty calling", arguing that the egoist has no political calling, but rather "lives themselves out" without regard to "how well or ill humanity may fare thereby".<ref>Moggach, Douglas. The New Hegelians. Cambridge University Press, 2006 p. 183.</ref> Stirner held that the only limitation on the rights of the individual is that individual's power to obtain what he desires.<ref>The Encyclopedia Americana: A Library of Universal Knowledge. Encyclopedia Corporation. p. 176</ref> Stirner proposes that most commonly accepted social institutions, including the notion of [[State (polity)|state]], [[property as a right]], [[natural rights]] in general and the very notion of "society" as a legal and ideal abstractness, were mere spooks in the mind. Stirner wants to "abolish not only the state but also society as an institution responsible for its members".<ref>Heider, Ulrike. ''Anarchism: Left, Right and Green'', San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1994, pp. 95–96</ref> Stirner advocated self-assertion and foresaw [[Union of egoists]], non-systematic associations which he proposed in as a form of organization in place of the state.<ref name=karl>{{cite book | last = Thomas | first = Paul | title = Karl Marx and the Anarchists | url = https://archive.org/details/karlmarxanarchis00thom | url-access = limited | publisher = [[Routledge]]/[[Kegan Paul]] | location = London | year = 1985 | isbn = 0710206852 |page=[https://archive.org/details/karlmarxanarchis00thom/page/n146 142]}}</ref> A Union is understood as a relation between egoists which is continually renewed by all parties' support through an act of will.<ref name=woodcock20/><ref name="nonserviam">{{cite journal|url=http://i-studies.com/journal/n/pdf/nsi-17.pdf#page=13 |title=The union of egoists |journal=Non Serviam |volume=1 |first=Svein Olav |last=Nyberg |pages=13–14 |location=Oslo, Norway |publisher=Svein Olav Nyberg |oclc=47758413 |access-date=1 September 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101207042220/http://i-studies.com/journal/n/pdf/nsi-17.pdf |archive-date=7 December 2010 }}</ref> Even murder is permissible "if it is right for me",<ref>Moggach, Douglas. The New Hegelians. Cambridge University Press, 2006 p. 191</ref> although it is claimed by egoist anarchists that egoism will foster genuine and spontaneous unions between individuals.<ref name=carlson>{{cite book | last = Carlson | first = Andrew | title = Anarchism in Germany |title-link=Anarchism in Germany (book) | publisher = Scarecrow Press | location = Metuchen | year = 1972 | isbn = 0810804840 | chapter-url = http://tmh.floonet.net/articles/carlson.html | chapter = Philosophical Egoism: German Antecedents | access-date = 2008-12-04 | url-status = dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081210202509/http://tmh.floonet.net/articles/carlson.html | archive-date = 2008-12-10 }}</ref>

[[File:Ein1844v2.png|thumb|200px|''[[The Ego and Its Own]]'' (1844) by Max Stirner]]
For Stirner, property simply comes about through might, arguing that "[w]hoever knows how to take, to defend, the thing, to him belongs property". He further says that "[w]hat I have in my power, that is my own. So long as I assert myself as holder, I am the proprietor of the thing" and that "I do not step shyly back from your property, but look upon it always as my property, in which I respect nothing. Pray do the like with what you call my property!"<ref>Stirner, Max. The Ego and Its Own, p. 248.</ref> His concept of "egoistic property" not only a lack of moral restraint on how one obtains and uses ''things'', but includes other people as well.<ref>Moggach, Douglas. The New Hegelians. Cambridge University Press, 2006 p. 194</ref> His embrace of egotism is in stark contrast to Godwin's [[altruism]]. Although Stirner was opposed to [[communism]], for the same reasons he opposed [[capitalism]], [[humanism]], [[liberalism]], [[Property rights (economics)|property rights]] and [[nationalism]], seeing them as forms of authority over the individual and as spooks in the mind, he has influenced many [[anarcho-communists]] and [[post-left anarchists]]. The writers of ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]'' report that "many in the anarchist movement in Glasgow, Scotland, took Stirner's 'Union of egoists' literally as the basis for their [[anarcho-syndicalist]] organising in the 1940s and beyond". Similarly, the noted anarchist historian [[Max Nettlau]] states that "[o]n reading Stirner, I maintain that he cannot be interpreted except in a socialist sense".<ref>{{cite book|editor-last=McKay|editor-first=Iain|year=2012|chapter=What are the ideas of Max Stirner?|title=An Anarchist FAQ|volume=II|location=Stirling|publisher=AK Press|isbn=9781849351225}}</ref> Stirner does not personally oppose the struggles carried out by certain ideologies such as socialism, humanism or the advocacy of [[human rights]]. Rather, he opposes their legal and ideal abstractness, a fact that makes him different from the [[liberal individualists]], including the [[anarcho-capitalists]] and [[right-libertarians]], but also from the ''[[Übermensch]]'' theories of [[fascism]] as he places the individual at the center and not the sacred collective. About socialism, Stirner wrote in a letter to [[Moses Hess]] that "I am not at all against socialism, but against consecrated socialism; my selfishness is not opposed to love [...] nor is it an enemy of sacrifice, nor of self-denial [...] and least of all of socialism [...]—in short, it is not an enemy of true interests; it rebels not against love, but against sacred love, not against thought, but against sacred thought, not against socialists, but against sacred socialism".<ref>Roudine, Victor. ''The Workers Struggle According to Max Stirner''. p. 12.</ref>

This position on property is quite different from the Native American, natural law, form of individualist anarchism which defends the inviolability of the private property that has been earned through labor.<ref>Weir, David. Anarchy & Culture. [[University of Massachusetts Press]]. 1997. p. 146</ref> However, Benjamin Tucker rejected the natural rights philosophy and adopted Stirner's egoism in 1886, with several others joining with him. This split the American individualists into fierce debate, "with the natural rights proponents accusing the egoists of destroying libertarianism itself".<ref>McElroy, Wendy. [https://books.google.com/books?id=DdHseFmQiSUC Benjamin Tucker, Individualism, & Liberty: Not the Daughter but the Mother of Order]. Institute for Human Studies. Autumn 1981, VOL. IV, NO. 3</ref> Other egoists include [[James L. Walker]], [[Sidney Parker (anarchist)|Sidney Parker]], [[Dora Marsden]] and [[John Beverley Robinson (anarchist)|John Beverly Robinson]]. In Russia, individualist anarchism inspired by Stirner combined with an appreciation for [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] attracted a small following of bohemian artists and intellectuals such as [[Lev Chernyi]] as well as a few lone wolves who found self-expression in crime and violence.<ref name=levy>Levy, Carl. "[http://uk.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761568770_1/Anarchism.html Anarchism]". Microsoft [[Encarta]] Online Encyclopedia 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091013001858/http://uk.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761568770_1/Anarchism.html |date=20091031000000 }} 2009-10-31.</ref> They rejected organizing, believing that only unorganized individuals were safe from coercion and domination, believing this kept them true to the ideals of anarchism.<ref>Avrich, Paul. "The Anarchists in the Russian Revolution". ''Russian Review'', Vol. 26, No. 4. (Oct., 1967). p. 343</ref> This type of individualist anarchism inspired [[anarcha-feminist]] [[Emma Goldman]].<ref name=levy/>

Although Stirner's philosophy is individualist, it has influenced some libertarian communists and anarcho-communists. "For Ourselves Council for Generalized Self-Management" discusses Stirner and speaks of a "communist egoism" which is said to be a "synthesis of individualism and collectivism" and says that "greed in its fullest sense is the only possible basis of communist society".<ref>For Ourselves, {{cite web|url=http://home.teleport.com/~rasputin/RTBGreedy-v1_2_5-en.htm |title=The_Right_To_Be_Greedy-v1_2_5-en |access-date=2008-11-17 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081228054533/http://home.teleport.com/~rasputin/RTBGreedy-v1_2_5-en.htm |archive-date=2008-12-28 }} ''The Right to Be Greedy: Theses On The Practical Necessity Of Demanding Everything'', 1974.</ref> Forms of libertarian communism such as [[Situationist International|Situationism]] are influenced by Stirner.<ref>See for example Christopher Gray, ''Leaving the Twentieth Century'', p. 88.</ref> Anarcho-communist [[Emma Goldman]] was influenced by both Stirner and [[Peter Kropotkin]] and blended their philosophies together in her own as shown in books of hers such as ''[[Anarchism and Other Essays|Anarchism And Other Essays]]''.<ref>Emma Goldman, ''Anarchism and Other Essays'', p. 50.</ref>

=== Early individualist anarchism in the United States ===
==== Josiah Warren ====
{{main|Josiah Warren}}
[[File:Josiah Warren.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Josiah Warren]]]]
Josiah Warren is widely regarded as the first [[Anarchism in the United States|American anarchist]] and the four-page weekly paper he edited during 1833, ''The Peaceful Revolutionist'', was the first anarchist periodical published,<ref name="bailie20">William Bailie, {{cite web|url=http://libertarian-labyrinth.org/warren/1stAmAnarch.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=June 17, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120204155505/http://libertarian-labyrinth.org/warren/1stAmAnarch.pdf |archive-date=February 4, 2012 }} ''Josiah Warren: The First American Anarchist  –  A Sociological Study'', Boston: Small, Maynard & Co., 1906, p. 20</ref> an enterprise for which he built his own printing press, cast his own type and made his own printing plates.<ref name="bailie20"/> He put his theories to the test by establishing an experimental "labor for labor store" called the [[Cincinnati Time Store]] where trade was facilitated by notes backed by a promise to perform labor. The store proved successful and operated for three years after which it was closed so that Warren could pursue establishing colonies based on [[Mutualism (economic theory)|mutualism]]. These included [[Utopia, Ohio|Utopia]] and [[Modern Times (community)|Modern Times]]. Warren said that [[Stephen Pearl Andrews]]' ''The Science of Society'' (published in 1852) was the most lucid and complete exposition of Warren's own theories.<ref>Charles A. Madison. "Anarchism in the United States". ''Journal of the History of Ideas'', Vol. 6, No. 1. (Jan., 1945), p. 53</ref> Catalan historian Xavier Diez report that the [[Intentional community|intentional communal]] experiments pioneered by Warren were influential in [[European individualist anarchism|European individualist anarchists]] of the late 19th and early 20th centuries such as [[Émile Armand]] and the [[Intentional community|intentional communities]] started by them.{{sfn|Díez|2007|p=42}}

==== Henry David Thoreau ====
{{main|Henry David Thoreau}}
[[File:Benjamin D. Maxham - Henry David Thoreau - Restored - greyscale - straightened.jpg|thumb|left|150px|[[Henry David Thoreau]]]]
Henry David Thoreau was an important early influence in individualist anarchist thought in the United States and Europe. Thoreau was an American author, poet, naturalist, tax resister, [[Development criticism|development critic]], surveyor, historian, philosopher and leading [[transcendentalist]]. He is best known for his book ''[[Walden]]'', a reflection upon [[simple living]] in natural surroundings; and his essay, ''[[Civil Disobedience (Thoreau)|Civil Disobedience]]'', an argument for individual resistance to civil government in moral opposition to an unjust state. His thought is an early influence on [[green anarchism]], but with an emphasis on the individual experience of the natural world influencing later [[Anarcho-naturism|naturist]] currents,<ref name="thoreau"/> [[simple living]] as a rejection of a [[Economic materialism|materialist]] lifestyle<ref name=thoreau/> and self-sufficiency were Thoreau's goals and the whole project was inspired by transcendentalist philosophy. Many have seen in Thoreau one of the precursors of ecologism and [[anarcho-primitivism]] represented today in [[John Zerzan]]. For [[George Woodcock]], this attitude can be also motivated by certain idea of resistance to progress and of rejection of the growing materialism which is the nature of American society in the mid 19th century.<ref name="naturismo"/>

The essay "[[Civil Disobedience (Thoreau)|Civil Disobedience]]" (''Resistance to Civil Government'') was first published in 1849. It argues that people should not permit governments to overrule or atrophy their consciences and that people have a duty to avoid allowing such [[acquiescence]] to enable the government to make them the agents of injustice. Thoreau was motivated in part by his disgust with slavery and the [[Mexican–American War]]. The essay later influenced [[Mohandas Gandhi]], [[Martin Luther King Jr.]], [[Martin Buber]] and [[Leo Tolstoy]] through its advocacy of [[nonviolent resistance]].<ref name="ppu.org.uk">{{Cite web |url=http://www.ppu.org.uk/e_publications/dd-trad8.html#anarch%20and%20violence |title=RESISTING THE NATION STATE the pacifist and anarchist tradition by Geoffrey Ostergaard |access-date=2010-01-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514052437/http://www.ppu.org.uk/e_publications/dd-trad8.html#anarch%20and%20violence |archive-date=2011-05-14 |url-status=dead }}</ref> It is also the main precedent for [[anarcho-pacifism]].<ref name="ppu.org.uk"/> The American version of individualist anarchism has a strong emphasis on the [[non-aggression principle]] and [[Self-ownership|individual sovereignty]].<ref name="Madison">{{cite journal |author=Madison, Charles A. |year=1945 |title=Anarchism in the United States |journal=Journal of the History of Ideas |volume=6 |issue=1 |pages=46–66 |jstor=2707055 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |doi=10.2307/2707055 }}</ref> Some individualist anarchists such as Thoreau<ref>Johnson, Ellwood. ''The Goodly Word: The Puritan Influence in America Literature'', Clements Publishing, 2005, p. 138.</ref><ref>''Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences'', edited by Edwin Robert Anderson Seligman, Alvin Saunders Johnson, 1937, p. 12.</ref> do not speak of economics, but simply of the right of "disunion" from the state and foresee the gradual elimination of the state through social evolution.

== Developments and expansion ==
=== Anarcha-feminism, free love, freethought and LGBT issues ===
{{main|Anarchism and issues related to love and sex|Anarcha-feminism|Queer anarchism}}
{{see also|Free love|Freethought}}
[[File:Lucifer, The Light-Bearer.jpg|thumb|left|250px|''[[Lucifer the Lightbearer]]'', an influential American free love journal]]
An important current within individualist anarchism is free love.<ref name="freelove">{{Cite web |url=http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle1996/le961210.html |title=The Free Love Movement and Radical Individualism By Wendy McElroy |access-date=2009-05-05 |archive-date=2011-06-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110614215038/http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle1996/le961210.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> Free love advocates sometimes traced their roots back to [[Josiah Warren]] and to experimental communities, and viewed sexual freedom as a clear, direct expression of an individual's [[self-ownership]]. Free love particularly stressed [[women's rights]] since most sexual laws, such as those governing marriage and use of birth control, discriminated against women.<ref name="freelove"/> The most important American free love journal was ''[[Lucifer the Lightbearer]]'' (1883–1907) edited by [[Moses Harman]] and [[Lois Waisbrooker]]<ref>Joanne E. Passet, "Power through Print: Lois Waisbrooker and Grassroots Feminism," in: ''Women in Print: Essays on the Print Culture of American Women from the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries'', James Philip Danky and Wayne A. Wiegand, eds., Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press, 2006; pp. 229–50.</ref> but also there existed [[Ezra Heywood]] and Angela Heywood's ''[[The Word (free love)|The Word]]'' (1872–1890, 1892–1893).<ref name="freelove"/> [[M. E. Lazarus]] was also an important American individualist anarchist who promoted free love.<ref name="freelove"/> [[John William Lloyd]], a collaborator of [[Benjamin Tucker]]'s periodical ''[[Liberty (1881–1908)|Liberty]]'', published in 1931 a sex manual that he called ''The Karezza Method or Magnetation: The Art of Connubial Love''.<ref>Lloyd, John William (1931). ''The Karezza Method or Magnetation: The Art of Connubial Love''. Roscoe, California. {{Cite web |url=http://www.reuniting.info/karezza_method_lloyd |title=The Karezza Method &#124; Reuniting |access-date=24 May 2011 |archive-date=28 August 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060828003549/http://www.reuniting.info/karezza_method_lloyd |url-status=bot: unknown }}. Retrieved 22 June 2020.</ref>

In Europe, the main propagandist of free love within individualist anarchism was [[Émile Armand]].<ref name="armandfreelove">{{Cite web |url=http://www.iisg.nl/womhist/manfreuk.pdf |title=E. Armand and "la camaraderie amoureuse". Revolutionary sexualism and the struggle against jealousy |access-date=2009-05-05 |archive-date=2011-05-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514110104/http://www.iisg.nl/womhist/manfreuk.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> He proposed the concept of ''la camaraderie amoureuse'' to speak of free love as the possibility of voluntary sexual encounter between consenting adults. He was also a consistent proponent of [[polyamory]].<ref name="armandfreelove"/> In France, there was also feminist activity inside individualist anarchism as promoted by [[Individualist feminism|individualist feminists]] Marie Küge, [[Anna Mahé]], [[Rirette Maîtrejean]] and Sophia Zaïkovska.<ref>[http://endehors.org/news/individualisme-anarchiste-et-feminisme-a-la-belle-epoque "Individualisme anarchiste et féminisme à la « Belle Epoque »"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120706170427/http://endehors.org/news/individualisme-anarchiste-et-feminisme-a-la-belle-epoque|date=6 July 2012}}</ref>

The Brazilian individualist anarchist [[Maria Lacerda de Moura]] lectured on topics such as education, [[women's rights]], [[free love]] and [[antimilitarism]]. Her writings and essays garnered her attention not only in Brazil, but also in [[Argentina]] and [[Uruguay]].<ref name="nodo50.org">[http://www.nodo50.org/insurgentes/textos/mulher/09marialacerda.htm "Maria Lacerda de Moura – Uma Anarquista Individualista Brasileira"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091028125644/http://www.nodo50.org/insurgentes/textos/mulher/09marialacerda.htm |date=2009-10-28 }}.</ref> She also wrote for the Spanish individualist anarchist magazine ''Al Margen'' alongside [[Miguel Giménez Igualada]].<ref>"Entre los redactores y colaboradores de Al Margen, que trasladará su redacción a Elda, en Alicante, encontraremos a Miguel Giménez Igualada, al escritor Gonzalo Vidal, u otros habituales de la prensa individualista como Costa Iscar, Mariano Gallardo o la periodista brasileña Maria Lacerda de Moura."</ref> In Germany, the [[Philosophy of Max Stirner|Stirnerists]] [[Adolf Brand]] and [[John Henry Mackay]] were pioneering campaigners for the acceptance of male [[bisexuality]] and [[homosexuality]].

Freethought as a philosophical position and as activism was important in both North American and European individualist anarchism, but in the United States freethought was basically an [[Anti-Christianity|anti-Christian]], [[Anti-clericalism|anti-clerical]] movement whose purpose was to make the individual politically and spiritually free to decide for himself on religious matters. A number of contributors to ''[[Liberty (1881–1908)|Liberty]]'' were prominent figures in both freethought and anarchism. The individualist anarchist George MacDonald was a co-editor of ''Freethought'' and for a time ''The Truth Seeker''. E.C. Walker was co-editor of ''[[Lucifer, the Light-Bearer]]''.<ref name="mises.org">[[Wendy McElroy]] [https://mises.org/library/culture-individualist-anarchism-late-19th-century-america "The culture of individualist anarchist in Late-nineteenth century America"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130911065010/http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/5_3/5_3_4.pdf |date=2013-09-11 }}</ref> Many of the anarchists were ardent freethinkers; reprints from freethought papers such as ''[[Lucifer, the Light-Bearer]]'', ''Freethought'' and ''The Truth Seeker'' appeared in ''Liberty''. The church was viewed as a common ally of the state and as a repressive force in and of itself.<ref name="mises.org"/>

In Europe, a similar development occurred in French and Spanish individualist anarchist circles: "Anticlericalism, just as in the rest of the libertarian movement, is another of the frequent elements which will gain relevance related to the measure in which the (French) Republic begins to have conflicts with the church [...] Anti-clerical discourse, frequently called for by the french individualist [[André Lorulot]], will have its impacts in ''Estudios'' (a Spanish individualist anarchist publication). There will be an attack on institutionalized religion for the responsibility that it had in the past on negative developments, for its irrationality which makes it a counterpoint of philosophical and scientific progress. There will be a criticism of proselitism and ideological manipulation which happens on both believers and agnostics".{{sfn|Díez|2007|p=143}} This tendencies will continue in French individualist anarchism in the work and activism of [[Charles-Auguste Bontemps]] and others. In the Spanish individualist anarchist magazine ''Ética'' and ''[[Iniciales]]'', "there is a strong interest in publishing scientific news, usually linked to a certain [[atheist]] and [[anti-theist]] obsession, philosophy which will also work for pointing out the incompatibility between science and religion, faith and reason. In this way there will be a lot of talk on Darwin's theories or on the negation of the existence of the soul".{{sfn|Díez|2007|p=152}}

=== Anarcho-naturism ===
{{main|Anarcho-naturism}}
{{see also|Naturism}}
[[File:Walden Thoreau.jpg|180px|thumb|''[[Walden]]'' by Henry David Thoreau was an influential early [[eco-anarchist]] work.]]
Another important current, especially within French and Spanish<ref name="naturismo">"Proliferarán así diversos grupos que practicarán el excursionismo, el naturismo, el nudismo, la emancipación sexual o el esperantismo, alrededor de asociaciones informales vinculadas de una manera o de otra al anarquismo. Precisamente las limitaciones a las asociaciones obreras impuestas desde la legislación especial de la Dictadura potenciarán indirectamente esta especie de asociacionismo informal en que confluirá el movimiento anarquista con esta heterogeneidad de prácticas y tendencias. Uno de los grupos más destacados, que será el impulsor de la revista individualista ''[[Iniciales|Ética]]'' será el Ateneo Naturista Ecléctico, con sede en Barcelona, con sus diferentes secciones la más destacada de las cuales será el grupo excursionista Sol y Vida." {{cite web|url=http://www.nodo50.org/ekintza/article.php3?id_article%3D310 |title=Ekintza Zuzena &#124;&#124; DOSSIER: EL NATURISMO LIBERTARIO EN LA PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA (1890-1939) |access-date=2014-06-03 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120320014704/https://www.nodo50.org/ekintza/article.php3?id_article=310 |archive-date=2012-03-20 }} {{cite web|url=http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=May 6, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |archive-date=July 23, 2011 }} "La insumisión voluntaria: El anarquismo individualista español durante la Dictadura y la Segunda República (1923–1938)" by Xavier Díez</ref><ref>"Anarchism and the different Naturist views have always been related." [http://www.naturismo.org/adn/ediciones/2003/invierno/7e.html "Anarchism – Nudism, Naturism"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303220612/http://www.naturismo.org/adn/ediciones/2003/invierno/7e.html |date=2016-03-03 }} by Carlos Ortega at Asociacion para el Desarrollo Naturista de la Comunidad de Madrid. Published on Revista ''ADN''. Winter 2003.</ref> individualist anarchist groups was [[naturism]].<ref>"From the 1880s, anarcho-individualist publications and teachings promoted the social emancipatory function of naturism and denounced deforestation, mechanization, civilization, and urbanization as corrupting effects of the consolidating industrial-capitalist order." [http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405184649_yr2011_toclevel_ss1-10 "Naturism"] by Stefano Boni in The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest Edited by Immanuel Ness. Wiley-Blackwell. 2009.</ref> Naturism promoted an ecological worldview, small [[ecovillage]]s and most prominently [[nudism]] as a way to avoid the artificiality of the industrial [[mass society]] of modernity. Naturist individualist anarchists saw the individual in his biological, physical and psychological aspects and avoided and tried to eliminate social determinations.<ref name="naturismo-el">"el individuo es visto en su dimensión biológica -física y psíquica- dejándose la social." ''El naturismo libertario en la península ibérica (1890–1939)'' by Josep Maria Rosell.</ref> An early influence in this vein was [[Henry David Thoreau]] and his famous book ''[[Walden]]''.<ref>"Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862), uno de los escritores próximos al movimiento de la filosofía trascendentalista, es uno de los más conocidos. Su obra más representativa es Walden, aparecida en 1854, aunque redactada entre 1845 y 1847, cuando Thoreau decide instalarse en el aislamiento de una cabaña en el bosque, y vivir en íntimo contacto con la naturaleza, en una vida de soledad y sobriedad. De esta experiencia, su filosofía trata de transmitirnos la idea de que resulta necesario un retorno respetuoso a la naturaleza, y que la felicidad es sobre todo fruto de la riqueza interior y de la armonía de los individuos con el entorno natural." [http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf "La insumisión voluntaria: El anarquismo individualista español durante la Dictadura y la Segunda República (1923–1938)"] by Xavier Díez {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |date=July 23, 2011 }}</ref> Important promoters of this were [[Henri Zisly]] and [[Émile Gravelle]] who collaborated in ''La Nouvelle Humanité'' followed by ''Le Naturien'', ''Le Sauvage'', ''L'Ordre Naturel'' and ''La Vie Naturelle''.<ref name="naturismo2">"1855 – France: Emile Gravelle lives, Douai. Militant anarchist & naturalist. Published the review "L'Etat Naturel." Collaborated with [[Henri Zisly]] & [[Henri Beylie]] on "La Nouvelle Humanité," followed by "Le Naturien," "Le Sauvage," "L'Ordre Naturel," & "La Vie Naturelle." [http://www.eskimo.com/~recall/bleed/1121.htm "The daily bleed"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160701210750/http://www.eskimo.com/~recall/bleed/1121.htm |date=July 1, 2016 }}</ref><ref>"Henri Zisly, self-labeled individualist anarchist, is considered one of the forerunners and principal organizers of the naturist movement in France and one of its most able and outspoken defenders worldwide." [http://www.revolutionprotestencyclopedia.com/public/tocnode?query=henry+david+thoreau&widen=1&result_number=1&from=search&id=g9781405184649_yr2011_chunk_g97814051846491756&type=std&fuzzy=0&slop=1 "Zisly, Henri (1872–1945)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170817230525/http://www.revolutionprotestencyclopedia.com/public/tocnode?query=henry+david+thoreau&widen=1&result_number=1&from=search&id=g9781405184649_yr2011_chunk_g97814051846491756&type=std&fuzzy=0&slop=1 |date=2017-08-17 }} by Stefano Boni.</ref>

=== Individualist anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche ===
{{main|Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche#Individualist anarchism|l1=Individualist anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche}}
The thought of German philosopher [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] has been influential in individualist anarchism, specifically in thinkers such as France's [[Émile Armand]],<ref>"The life of Émile Armand (1872–1963) spanned the history of anarchism. He was influenced by Leo Tolstoy and Benjamin Tucker, and to a lesser extent by Whitman and Emerson. Later in life, Nietzsche and Stirner became important to his way of thinking." [http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/worldwidemovements/armand.html Introduction] to ''The Anarchism of Émile Armand''</ref> the Italian [[Renzo Novatore]]<ref name="novatore-toward">[http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Renzo_Novatore__Toward_the_Creative_Nothing.html ''Toward the Creative Nothing''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302040043/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Renzo_Novatore__Toward_the_Creative_Nothing.html |date=2012-03-02 }} by [[Renzo Novatore]]</ref> and the Colombian [[Biofilo Panclasta]]. Robert C. Holub, author of ''Nietzsche: Socialist, Anarchist, Feminist'' posits that "translations of Nietzsche's writings in the United States very likely appeared first in ''Liberty'', the anarchist journal edited by [[Benjamin Tucker]]".<ref>[http://learning.berkeley.edu/robertholub/research/ Robert C. Holub, ''Nietzsche: Socialist, Anarchist, Feminist''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070621161104/http://learning.berkeley.edu/robertholub/research/ |date=2007-06-21 }}</ref>

=== Individualist anarchism in the United States ===
{{main|Individualist anarchism in the United States}}

==== Mutualism and utopianism ====
[[File:Stephen Pearl Andrews.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Stephen Pearl Andrews]]]]
For American anarchist historian Eunice Minette Schuster, "[i]t is apparent [...] that [[Proudhon]]ian Anarchism was to be found in the United States at least as early as 1848 and that it was not conscious of its affinity to the Individualist Anarchism of [[Josiah Warren]] and [[Stephen Pearl Andrews]] [...] [[William B. Greene]] presented this Proudhonian Mutualism in its purest and most systematic form".<ref name="againstallauthority.org">[http://www.againstallauthority.org/NativeAmericanAnarchism.html ''Native American Anarchism: A Study of Left-Wing American Individualism'' by Eunice Minette Schuster] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160213201445/http://www.againstallauthority.org/NativeAmericanAnarchism.html|date=February 13, 2016}}</ref> [[William Batchelder Greene]] is best known for the works ''Mutual Banking'' (1850) which proposed an interest-free banking system and ''Transcendentalism'', a critique of the [[Transcendentalism|New England philosophical school]]. He saw mutualism as the synthesis of "liberty and order".<ref name="againstallauthority.org"/> His "associationism [...] is checked by individualism. [...] 'Mind your own business,' 'Judge not that ye be not judged.' Over matters which are purely personal, as for example, moral conduct, the individual is sovereign, as well as over that which he himself produces. For this reason he demands 'mutuality' in marriage—the equal right of a woman to her own personal freedom and property<ref name="againstallauthority.org"/> and feminist and spiritualist tendencies".<ref name="theanarchistlibrary.org">{{Cite web |url=http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Hakim_Bey__The_Lemonade_Ocean___Modern_Times.html |title=Hakim Bey |access-date=2011-08-08 |archive-date=2022-03-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220319144631/http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/library/hakim-bey-the-lemonade-ocean-modern-times |url-status=live }}</ref> Within some individualist anarchist circles, ''[[Mutualism (economic theory)|mutualism]]'' came to mean non-communist anarchism.<ref>Wilbur, Shawn P. (2018). "Mutualism". In Adams, Matthew S.; Levy, Carl. ''The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism''. Springer. p. 221. {{ISBN|9783319756202}}.</ref>

Contemporary American anarchist [[Hakim Bey]] reports that "[[Stephen Pearl Andrews|Steven Pearl Andrews]] [...] was not a fourierist (see [[Charles Fourier]]), but he lived through the brief craze for [[Phalanstère|phalansteries]] in America & adopted a lot of fourierist principles & practices, [...] a maker of worlds out of words. He syncretized [[Abolitionism in the United States|Abolitionism]], [[Free love|Free Love]], spiritual universalism, [[Josiah Warren|(Josiah) Warren]], & (Charles) Fourier into a grand utopian scheme he called the Universal Pantarchy. [...] He was instrumental in founding several 'intentional communities,' including the 'Brownstone Utopia' on 14th St. in New York, & 'Modern Times' in Brentwood, Long Island. The latter became as famous as the best-known [[Fourierism|fourierist]] communes (Brook Farm in Massachusetts & the North American Phalanx in New Jersey)—in fact, Modern Times became downright notorious (for 'Free Love') & finally foundered under a wave of scandalous publicity. Andrews (& [[Victoria Woodhull]]) were members of the infamous Section 12 of the [[1st International]], expelled by [[Marx]] for its anarchist, feminist, & spiritualist tendencies".<ref name="theanarchistlibrary.org"/>

==== Boston anarchists ====
[[File:LysanderSpooner.jpg|thumb|left|150px|[[Lysander Spooner]]]]
Another form of individualist anarchism was found in the United States as advocated by the so-called Boston anarchists.<ref name=levy/> By default, American individualists had no difficulty accepting the concepts that "one man employ another" or that "he direct him", in his labor but rather demanded that "all natural opportunities requisite to the production of wealth be accessible to all on equal terms and that monopolies arising from special privileges created by law be abolished".<ref>Madison, Charles A. "Anarchism in the United States." ''Journal of the History of Ideas'', Vol 6, No 1, January 1945, p. 53.</ref>

They believed [[state monopoly capitalism]] (defined as a state-sponsored monopoly)<ref name=schwartzman>Schwartzman, Jack. "Ingalls, Hanson, and Tucker: Nineteenth-Century American Anarchists." ''American Journal of Economics and Sociology'', Vol. 62, No. 5 (November 2003). p. 325.</ref> prevented labor from being fully rewarded. [[Voltairine de Cleyre]] summed up the philosophy by saying that the anarchist individualists "are firm in the idea that the system of employer and employed, buying and selling, banking, and all the other essential institutions of Commercialism, centred upon private property, are in themselves good, and are rendered vicious merely by the interference of the State".<ref>de Cleyre, Voltairine. Anarchism. Originally published in ''Free Society'', 13 October 1901. Published in Exquisite Rebel: The Essays of Voltairine de Cleyre, edited by [[Sharon Presley]], SUNY Press 2005, p. 224.</ref>

Even among the 19th-century American individualists, there was not a monolithic doctrine as they disagreed amongst each other on various issues including [[intellectual property]] rights and [[Possession (law)|possession]] versus [[property]] in land.<ref>Spooner, Lysander. [http://lysanderspooner.org/intellect/contents.htm ''The Law of Intellectual Property''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140524005404/http://lysanderspooner.org/intellect/contents.htm|date=May 24, 2014}}.</ref><ref name=watner>[[Carl Watner|Watner, Carl]] (1977). {{cite web |url=https://www.mises.org/journals/jls/1_4/1_4_4.pdf |title=Benjamin Tucker and His Periodical, Liberty |date=30 July 2014 |access-date=13 September 2014 |archive-date=11 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130911052214/http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/1_4/1_4_4.pdf |url-status=live }}&nbsp;{{small|(868&nbsp;KB)}}. ''[[Journal of Libertarian Studies]]'', Vol. 1, No. 4, p. 308.</ref><ref>[[Carl Watner|Watner, Carl]]. "{{cite web |url=https://www.mises.org/journals/lf/1975/1975_03.pdf |title=Spooner Vs. Liberty |date=18 August 2014 |access-date=13 September 2014 |archive-date=5 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120905120641/http://mises.org/journals/lf/1975/1975_03.pdf |url-status=live }}"&nbsp;{{small|(1.20&nbsp;MB)}} in ''The Libertarian Forum''. March 1975. Volume VII, No 3. {{ISSN|0047-4517}}. pp. 5–6.</ref> A major schism occurred later in the 19th century when Tucker and some others abandoned their traditional support of [[natural right]]s as espoused by [[Lysander Spooner]] and converted to an "egoism" modeled upon [[Philosophy of Max Stirner|Max Stirner's philosophy]].<ref name=watner/> [[Lysander Spooner]] besides his individualist anarchist activism was also an important anti-slavery activist and became a member of the [[First International]].<ref>[[George Woodcock]]. Anarchism: a history of anarchist ideas and movements (1962). p. 459.</ref>

Some Boston anarchists, including Benjamin Tucker, identified themselves as [[socialist]]s, which in the 19th century was often used in the sense of a commitment to improving conditions of the working class (i.e. "[[the labor problem]]").<ref>Brooks, Frank H. 1994. ''The Individualist Anarchists: An Anthology of Liberty'' (1881–1908). Transaction Publishers. p. 75.</ref> The Boston anarchists such as Tucker and his followers continue to be considered socialists due to their opposition to usury.<ref>[http://www.infoshop.org/page/AnarchistFAQSectionG1#secg14 "G.1.4 Why is the social context important in evaluating Individualist Anarchism?" in ''An Anarchist FAQ'']{{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130315000327/http://www.infoshop.org/page/AnarchistFAQSectionG1#secg14 |date=March 15, 2013 }}</ref> They do so because as the modern economist Jim Stanford points out there are many different kinds of competitive markets such as market socialism and capitalism is only one type of a market economy.<ref>Stanford, Jim. Economics for Everyone: A Short Guide to the Economics of Capitalism. Ann Arbor: MI., Pluto Press. 2008. p. 36.</ref> By around the start of the 20th century, the heyday of individualist anarchism had passed.<ref>[[Paul Avrich|Avrich, Paul]]. 2006. ''[[Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America]]''. [[AK Press]]. p. 6.</ref>

==== Individualist anarchism and the labor movement ====
[[File:Dyer D Lum.jpg|thumb|180px|[[Dyer Lum]]]]
[[George Woodcock]] reports that the American individualist anarchists [[Lysander Spooner]] and [[William B. Greene]] had been members of the socialist [[First International]].<ref name="Woodcock">{{cite book|last=Woodcock|first=G.|author-link=George Woodcock|title=Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements|year=1962|publisher=Penguin|location=Melbourne|page=460}}</ref>

Two individualist anarchists who wrote in [[Benjamin Tucker]]'s ''[[Liberty (1881–1908)|Liberty]]'' were also important labor organizers of the time. [[Joseph Labadie]] was an American labor organizer, individualist anarchist, social activist, printer, publisher, essayist and poet. In 1883, Labadie embraced a non-violent version of individualist anarchism. Without the oppression of the state, Labadie believed, humans would choose to harmonize with "the great natural laws [...] without robbing [their] fellows through interest, profit, rent and taxes". However, he supported community cooperation as he supported community control of water utilities, streets and railroads.<ref>Martin, James J. (1970). ''Men Against the State: The Expositors of Individualist Anarchism in America, 1827–1908.'' Colorado Springs: Ralph Myles Publisher.</ref> Although he did not support the militant anarchism of the [[Haymarket Riot|Haymarket anarchists]], he fought for the clemency of the accused because he did not believe they were the perpetrators. In 1888, Labadie organized the Michigan Federation of Labor, became its first president and forged an alliance with [[Samuel Gompers]]. A colleague of Labadie's at ''Liberty'', [[Dyer Lum]] was another important individualist anarchist [[labor activism|labor activist]] and poet of the era.<ref name="shuster">{{cite book |last=Schuster |first=Eunice |title=Native American Anarchism |publisher=Breakout Productions |location=City |year=1999 |isbn=9781893626218 |page=168 (footnote 22) }}</ref> A leading [[anarcho-syndicalist]] and a prominent [[left-wing]] [[intellectual]] of the 1880s,<ref name="johnpoll">{{cite book |last=Johnpoll |first=Bernard |author2=Harvey Klehr |title=Biographical Dictionary of the American Left |publisher=Greenwood Press |location=Westport |year=1986 |isbn=9780313242007 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/biographicaldict0000unse_o7r7 }}</ref> he is remembered as the lover and mentor of early [[anarcha-feminist]] [[Voltairine de Cleyre]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=de Cleyre|first1=Voltairine|title=Exquisite Rebel: The Essays of Voltairine de Cleyre: Anarchist, Feminist, Genius|url=https://archive.org/details/exquisiterebeles0000decl|url-access=registration|date=February 10, 2005|publisher=State University of New York Press|isbn=0791460940|page=[https://archive.org/details/exquisiterebeles0000decl/page/83 83]}}</ref>

Lum was a prolific writer who wrote a number of key anarchist texts and contributed to publications including ''[[Mother Earth (journal)|Mother Earth]]'', ''Twentieth Century'', ''The Alarm'' (the journal of the [[International Working People's Association]]) and ''The Open Court'' among others. Lum's [[political philosophy]] was a fusion of individualist [[anarchist economics]]—"a radicalized form of ''laissez-faire'' economics" inspired by the [[#Boston anarchists|Boston anarchists]]—with radical labor organization similar to that of the Chicago anarchists of the time.<ref name="carson">{{cite web |url=http://mutualist.blogspot.com/2005/04/may-day-thoughts-individualist.html |title=May Day Thoughts: Individualist Anarchism and the Labor Movement |last=Carson |first=Kevin |author-link=Kevin Carson |access-date=2007-08-07 |work=Mutualist Blog: Free Market Anti-Capitalism |archive-date=2007-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070701051527/http://mutualist.blogspot.com/2005/04/may-day-thoughts-individualist.html |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Herbert Spencer]] and [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]] influenced Lum strongly in his individualist tendency.<ref name="carson" /> He developed a "[[Mutualism (economic theory)|mutualist]]" theory of unions and as such was active within the [[Knights of Labor]] and later promoted [[Apolitical|anti-political]] strategies in the [[American Federation of Labor]].<ref name="carson" /> Frustration with [[Abolitionism in the United States|abolitionism]], [[Spiritualism (movement)|spiritualism]] and labor reform caused Lum to embrace anarchism and radicalize workers.<ref name="carson"/> Convinced of the necessity of violence to enact social change he volunteered to fight in the [[American Civil War]], hoping thereby to bring about the end of [[slavery]].<ref>{{cite book|author1=Gary S. Sprayberry|editor1-last=Ness|editor1-first=Immanuel|title=The International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest|date=2009|url=http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405184649_chunk_g9781405184649939|access-date=June 6, 2014}}</ref> [[Kevin Carson]] has praised Lum's fusion of individualist ''laissez-faire'' economics with radical labor activism as "creative" and described him as "more significant than any in the Boston group".<ref name="carson"/>

==== Egoist anarchism ====
[[File:BenjaminTucker.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Benjamin Tucker]]]]
Some of the American individualist anarchists later in this era such as [[Benjamin Tucker]] abandoned natural rights positions and converted to [[Max Stirner]]'s [[egoist anarchism]]. Rejecting the idea of moral rights, Tucker said that there were only two rights, "the right of might" and "the right of contract". He also said after converting to Egoist individualism that "[i]n times past [...] it was my habit to talk glibly of the right of man to land. It was a bad habit, and I long ago sloughed it off [...] Man's only right to land is his might over it".<ref>Tucker, Instead of a Book, p. 350</ref> In adopting Stirnerite egoism in 1886, Tucker rejected natural rights which had long been considered the foundation of [[libertarianism in the United States]]. This rejection galvanized the movement into fierce debates, with the natural rights proponents accusing the egoists of destroying libertarianism itself. So bitter was the conflict that a number of natural rights proponents withdrew from the pages of ''Liberty'' in protest even though they had hitherto been among its frequent contributors. Thereafter, ''Liberty'' championed egoism although its general content did not change significantly.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=DdHseFmQiSUC Wendy Mcelroy. "Benjamin Tucker, Individualism, & Liberty: Not the Daughter but the Mother of Order"]</ref>

Several periodicals were undoubtedly influenced by ''Liberty'''s presentation of egoism. They included ''I'' published by [[Clarence Lee Swartz]], edited by [[William Walstein Gordak]] and [[J. William Lloyd]] (all associates of ''Liberty''); and ''The Ego'' and ''The Egoist'', both of which were edited by Edward H. Fulton. Among the egoist papers that Tucker followed were the German ''Der Eigene'', edited by [[Adolf Brand]]; and ''The Eagle'' and ''The Serpent'', issued from London. The latter, the most prominent English-language egoist journal, was published from 1898 to 1900 with the subtitle "A Journal of Egoistic Philosophy and Sociology".<ref name="mcelroy-jury">McElroy, Wendy. [https://web.archive.org/web/20020601050034/http://libertariannation.org/a/f62m1.html A Reconsideration of Trial by Jury], ''Forumulations'', Winter 1998–1999, Free Nation Foundation</ref>

American anarchists who adhered to egoism include Benjamin Tucker, [[John Beverley Robinson (anarchist)|John Beverley Robinson]], [[Steven T. Byington]], [[Hutchins Hapgood]], [[James L. Walker]], [[Victor Yarros]] and Edward H. Fulton.<ref name="mcelroy"/> Walker published the work ''The Philosophy of Egoism'' in which he argued that egoism "implies a rethinking of the self-other relationship, nothing less than 'a complete revolution in the relations of mankind' that avoids both the 'archist' principle that legitimates domination and the 'moralist' notion that elevates self-renunciation to a virtue. Walker describes himself as an 'egoistic anarchist' who believed in both contract and cooperation as practical principles to guide everyday interactions".<ref>John F. Welsh. ''Max Stirner's Dialectical Egoism: A New Interpretation.'' Lexington Books. 2010. p. 163</ref> For Walker, "what really defines egoism is not mere self-interest, pleasure, or greed; it is the sovereignty of the individual, the full expression of the subjectivity of the individual ego".<ref>John F. Welsh. ''Max Stirner's Dialectical Egoism: A New Interpretation.'' Lexington Books. 2010. p. 167</ref>

[[#Italy|Italian anti-organizationalist individualist anarchism]] was brought to the United States<ref>"it was in times of severe social repression and deadening social quiescence that individualist anarchists came to the foreground of libertarian activity – and then primarily as terrorists. In France, Spain, and the United States, individualistic anarchists committed acts of terrorism that gave anarchism its reputation as a violently sinister conspiracy." [http://libcom.org/library/socanlifean2] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200418210801/http://libcom.org/library/socanlifean2 |date=2020-04-18 }}. [[Murray Bookchin]]. ''[[Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism: An Unbridgeable Chasm]]''.</ref> by Italian born individualists such as [[Giuseppe Ciancabilla]] and others who advocated for violent [[propaganda by the deed]] there. Anarchist historian [[George Woodcock]] reports the incident in which the important Italian [[social anarchist]] [[Errico Malatesta]] became involved "in a dispute with the individualist anarchists of [[Paterson, New Jersey|Paterson]], who insisted that anarchism implied no organization at all, and that every man must act solely on his impulses. At last, in one noisy debate, the individual impulse of a certain Ciancabilla directed him to shoot Malatesta, who was badly wounded but obstinately refused to name his assailant".<ref>Woodcock, George. ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements.'' 1962</ref>

[[Enrico Arrigoni]] (pseudonym Frank Brand) was an Italian American [[individualist anarchist]] Lathe operator, house painter, bricklayer, dramatist and political activist influenced by the work of [[Max Stirner]].<ref name="recollectionbooks.com">[http://recollectionbooks.com/bleed/gallery/galleryindex.htm#EnricoArrigoni Enrico Arrigoni at the Daily Bleed's Anarchist Encyclopedia] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150502052423/http://recollectionbooks.com/bleed/gallery/galleryindex.htm#EnricoArrigoni|date=2 May 2015}}</ref><ref name="books.google.com">[[Paul Avrich]]. [https://books.google.com/books?id=8z8mdUYp-6gC&q=enrico+arrigoni+totalitarian&pg=PA169 ''Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America''].</ref> He took the pseudonym Brand from a fictional character in one of [[Henrik Ibsen]]'s plays.<ref name="books.google.com"/> In the 1910s, he started becoming involved in anarchist and anti-war activism around Milan.<ref name="books.google.com"/> From the 1910s until the 1920s, he participated in anarchist activities and popular uprisings in various countries including Switzerland, Germany, Hungary, Argentina and Cuba.<ref name="books.google.com"/> He lived from the 1920s onwards in New York City, where he edited the individualist anarchist eclectic journal ''Eresia'' in 1928. He also wrote for other American anarchist publications such as ''[[L' Adunata dei refrattari]]'', ''Cultura Obrera'', ''Controcorrente'' and ''Intesa Libertaria''.<ref name="books.google.com"/> During the [[Spanish Civil War]], he went to fight with the anarchists, but he was imprisoned and was helped on his release by [[Emma Goldman]].<ref name="recollectionbooks.com"/><ref name="books.google.com"/> Afterwards, Arrigoni became a longtime member of the [[Libertarian Book Club]] in New York City.<ref name="books.google.com"/> His written works include ''The Totalitarian Nightmare'' (1975), ''The Lunacy of the Superman'' (1977), ''Adventures in the Country of the Monoliths'' (1981) and ''Freedom: My Dream'' (1986).<ref name="books.google.com"/>

==== Post-left anarchy and insurrectionary anarchism ====
{{Primary sources section|date=August 2023}}
{{main|Insurrectionary anarchism|Post-left anarchy}}
{{see also|Lifestyle anarchism}}
[[Murray Bookchin]] identified post-left anarchy as a form of individualist anarchism in ''[[Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism: An Unbridgeable Chasm]]'' where he identifies "a shift among Euro-American anarchists away from social anarchism and toward individualist or lifestyle anarchism. Indeed, lifestyle anarchism today is finding its principal expression in spray-can graffiti, post-modernist [[nihilism]], antirationalism, [[Anarcho-primitivism|neoprimitivism]], anti-technologism, neo-[[Situationist International|Situationist]] 'cultural terrorism', mysticism, and a 'practice' of staging [[Michel Foucault|Foucauldian]] 'personal insurrections'".<ref>''Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism: An Unbridgeable Chasm'' by [[Murray Bookchin]]</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}} Post-left anarchist [[The Abolition of Work|Bob Black]] in his long critique of Bookchin's philosophy called ''Anarchy After Leftism'' said about post-left anarchy that "[i]t is, unlike Bookchinism, "individualistic" in the sense that if the freedom and happiness of the individual—i.e., each and every really existing person, every Tom, Dick and Murray—is not the measure of the good society, what is?"<ref>[http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Bob_Black__Anarchy_after_Leftism.html#toc13 ''Anarchy after Leftism''] by [[The Abolition of Work|Bob Black]].</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}}

A strong relationship does exist between post-left anarchism and the work of individualist anarchist [[Max Stirner]]. [[Jason McQuinn]] says that "when I (and other anti-ideological anarchists) criticize ideology, it is always from a specifically critical, anarchist perspective rooted in both the skeptical, individualist-anarchist philosophy of Max Stirner.<ref name="Cuchuflito">"What is Ideology?" by [[Jason McQuinn]]</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}}

[[Hakim Bey]] has said that "[f]rom Stirner's '[[Union of egoists|Union of Self-Owning Ones]]' we proceed to [[Nietzsche]]'s circle of 'Free Spirits' and thence to [[Charles Fourier]]'s 'Passional Series', doubling and redoubling ourselves even as the Other multiplies itself in the eros of the group".<ref>[http://www.left-bank.org/bey/default3.htm ''Immediatism'' by Hakim Bey. AK Press. 1994. p. 4] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091205152300/http://www.left-bank.org/bey/default3.htm |date=December 5, 2009 }}</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}} Bey also wrote that "[t]he Mackay Society, of which Mark & I are active members, is devoted to the anarchism of Max Stirner, [[Benjamin Tucker|Benj. Tucker]] & [[John Henry Mackay]]. [...] The Mackay Society, incidentally, represents a little-known current of individualist thought which never cut its ties with revolutionary labor. [[Dyer Lum]], [[Ezra Heywood|Ezra]] & Angela Haywood represent this school of thought; [[Jo Labadie]], who wrote for Tucker's ''[[Liberty (1881–1908)|Liberty]]'', made himself a link between the American 'plumb-line' anarchists, the 'philosophical' individualists, & the syndicalist or communist branch of the movement; his influence reached the Mackay Society through his son, Laurance. Like the Italian Stirnerites (who influenced us through our late friend [[Enrico Arrigoni]]) we support all anti-authoritarian currents, despite their apparent contradictions".<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Hakim_Bey__An_esoteric_interpretation_of_the_I.W.W._preamble.html |title=Hakim Bey. "An esoteric interpretation of the I.W.W. preamble" |access-date=2011-10-03 |archive-date=2011-10-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111007043352/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Hakim_Bey__An_esoteric_interpretation_of_the_I.W.W._preamble.html |url-status=live }}</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}}

As far as posterior individualist anarchists, [[Jason McQuinn]] for some time used the pseudonym [[Lev Chernyi]] in honor of the Russian individualist anarchist of the same name while Feral Faun has quoted Italian individualist anarchist [[Renzo Novatore]]<ref name="wolfinovatore2">[http://www.anti-politics.net/feral-faun/whither-now.html Anti-politics.net] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090814005540/http://www.anti-politics.net/feral-faun/whither-now.html |date=2009-08-14 }}, "Whither now? Some thoughts on creating anarchy" by Feral Faun</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}} and has translated both Novatore<ref name="wolfinovatore">[http://www.omnipresence.mahost.org/creativenothing.htm Towards the creative nothing and other writings by Renzo Novatore] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080820035443/http://www.omnipresence.mahost.org/creativenothing.htm |date=August 20, 2008 }}</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}} and the young Italian individualist anarchist [[Bruno Filippi]]<ref name="rebel's dark"/>{{Primary source inline|date=August 2023}}

=== Individualist anarchism in Europe ===
{{main|Individualist anarchism in Europe}}
[[File:Emilearmand01.jpg|thumb|left|140px|[[Émile Armand]]]]
European individualist anarchism proceeded from the roots laid by [[William Godwin]],<ref name=woodcock20/> [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]] and [[Max Stirner]]. Proudhon was an early pioneer of [[anarchism]] as well as of the important individualist anarchist current of [[Mutualism (economic theory)|mutualism]].<ref name="Encyclopedia Americana"/><ref name="Hamilton 1995 79"/> Stirner became a central figure of individualist anarchism through the publication of his seminal work ''[[The Ego and Its Own]]'' which is considered to be "a founding text in the tradition of individualist anarchism".<ref name=stirnersep/>

European individualist anarchists include [[Albert Libertad]], Bellegarrigue, [[Oscar Wilde]], [[Émile Armand]], [[Lev Chernyi]], [[John Henry Mackay]], [[Han Ryner]], [[Adolf Brand]], [[Miguel Giménez Igualada]], [[Renzo Novatore]] and currently [[Michel Onfray]].<ref name="regards.fr">Onfray says in an interview "L'individualisme anarchiste part de cette logique. Il célèbre les individualités&nbsp;... Dans cette période de libéralisme comme horizon indépassable, je persiste donc à plaider pour l'individu."[http://www.regards.fr/culture/interview-des-lecteurs-michel Interview des lecteurs : Michel Onfray Par Marion Rousset| 1er avril 2005] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120404134143/http://www.regards.fr/culture/interview-des-lecteurs-michel|date=2012-04-04}}</ref> Important currents within it include [[free love]],<ref name="spain">
[http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf "Voluntary non-submission. Spanish individualist anarchism during dictatorship and the second republic (1923–1938)" by Xavier Diez] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |date=July 23, 2011 }}</ref> [[anarcho-naturism]]<ref name="spain"/> and [[illegalism]].<ref name="inanrcillegal">
"Parallel to the social, [[Collectivist anarchism|collectivist]] anarchist current there was an individualist one whose partisans emphasized their individual freedom and advised other individuals to do the same. Individualist anarchist activity spanned the full spectrum of alternatives to [[authoritarian]] society, subverting it by undermining its way of life facet by facet." Thus [[theft]], [[counterfeiting]], swindling and [[robbery]] became a way of life for hundreds of individualists, as it was already for countless thousands of [[proletarian]]s. The wave of anarchist bombings and assassinations of the 1890s ([[Auguste Vaillant]], Ravachol, [[Émile Henry (anarchist)|Émile Henry]], [[Sante Caserio]]) and the practice of illegalism from the mid-1880s to the start of the First World War ([[Clément Duval]], Pini, [[Marius Jacob]], the Bonnot gang) were twin aspects of the same proletarian offensive, but were expressed in an individualist practice, one that complemented the great collective struggles against capital."</ref>

==== France ====
{{main|Individualist anarchism in France}}
[[File:Han Ryner.JPG|thumb|150px|[[Han Ryner]]]]
From the legacy of Proudhon and Stirner there emerged a strong tradition of [[Individualist anarchism in France|French individualist anarchism]]. An early important individualist anarchist was [[Anselme Bellegarrigue]]. He participated in the [[French Revolution of 1848]], was author and editor of ''Anarchie, Journal de l'Ordre and Au fait ! Au fait ! Interprétation de l'idée démocratique'' and wrote the important early [[Anarchist Manifesto]] in 1850. Catalan historian of individualist anarchism Xavier Diez reports that during his travels in the United States "he at least contacted [[Henry David Thoreau|(Henry David) Thoreau]] and, probably [[Josiah Warren|(Josiah) Warren]]".{{sfn|Díez|2007|p=60}} ''Autonomie Individuelle'' was an individualist anarchist publication that ran from 1887 to 1888. It was edited by Jean-Baptiste Louiche, Charles Schæffer and Georges Deherme.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.la-presse-anarchiste.net/spip.php?rubrique258 |title=Autonomie Individuelle (1887–1888) |access-date=2010-02-17 |archive-date=2015-05-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518185802/http://la-presse-anarchiste.net/spip.php?rubrique258 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

Later, this tradition continued with such intellectuals as [[Albert Libertad]], [[André Lorulot]], [[Émile Armand]], [[Victor Serge]], [[Zo d'Axa]] and [[Rirette Maîtrejean]], who in 1905 developed theory in the main individualist anarchist journal in France, ''[[L'Anarchie]]''.<ref>"On the fringe of the movement, and particularly in the individualist faction which became relatively strong after 1900 and began to publish its own sectarian paper, – 315 – L'Anarchie ( 1905–14), there were groups and individuals who lived largely by crime. Among them were some of the most original as well as some of the most tragic figures in anarchist history." Woodcock, George. ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements. 1962''</ref>

[[File:Zo d'Axa portrait.jpg|thumb|left|150px|[[Zo d'Axa]]]]
In this sense, "the theoretical positions and the vital experiences of [F]rench individualism are deeply iconoclastic and scandalous, even within libertarian circles. The call of nudist [[naturism]], the strong defence of birth control methods, the idea of "[[Union of egoists|unions of egoists]]" with the sole justification of sexual practices, that will try to put in practice, not without difficulties, will establish a way of thought and action, and will result in sympathy within some, and a strong rejection within others".<ref name="frenchexperimentation">[http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf "La insumisión voluntaria. El anarquismo individualista español durante la dictadura y la Segunda República" by Xavier Díez] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf|date=July 23, 2011}}</ref>

[[File:Albert libertad.jpg|thumb|180px|[[Albert Libertad]]]]
French individualist anarchists grouped behind [[Émile Armand]], published ''[[L'Unique]]'' after [[World War II]]. ''[[L'Unique]]'' went from 1945 to 1956 with a total of 110 numbers.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.alasbarricadas.org/ateneovirtual/index.php/%C3%89mile_Armand |title=Émile Armand in A las barricadas.com |access-date=2017-03-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120214231937/http://www.alasbarricadas.org/ateneovirtual/index.php/%C3%89mile_Armand |archive-date=2012-02-14 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.la-presse-anarchiste.net/spip.php?rubrique1 |title=Unique, L' (1945–1956) |access-date=2010-02-17 |archive-date=2011-10-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111007040412/http://www.la-presse-anarchiste.net/spip.php?rubrique1 |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Gérard de Lacaze-Duthiers]] was a French writer, art critic, [[pacifist]] and [[anarchist]]. Lacaze-Duthiers, an art critic for the Symbolist review journal ''[[La Plume]]'', was influenced by [[Oscar Wilde]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] and [[Max Stirner]]. His (1906) ''{{Lang|fr|L'Ideal Humain de l'Art}}'' helped found the "artistocracy movement"—a movement advocating life in the service of art.<ref>{{Cite thesis |last1=Peterson |first1=Joseph W. |title=Gérard De Lacaze-Duthiers, Charles Péguy, and Edward Carpenter: An Examination of Neo-Romantic Radicalism Before the Great War |date=August 2010 |url=http://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/871 |publisher=Clemson University |type=M.A. thesis |df=mdy-all |pages=8, 15–30}}</ref> His ideal was an anti-elitist aestheticism: "All men should be artists".<ref>Lacaze-Duthiers, ''L'Ideal Humain de l'Art'', pp. 57–8.</ref> Together with [[André Colomer]] and [[Manuel Devaldes]], in 1913 he founded ''{{Lang|fr|L'Action d'Art}}'', an anarchist literary journal.<ref name="Sonn2010">{{cite book|author=Richard David Sonn|title=Sex, Violence, and the Avant-Garde: Anarchism in Interwar France|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C4wWq0b9ZIMC&pg=PA199|access-date=27 January 2013|year=2010|publisher=Penn State Press|isbn=978-0-271-03663-2|page=199}}</ref> After [[World War II]], he contributed to the journal ''[[L'Unique]]''.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.la-presse-anarchiste.net/spip.php?rubrique1 |title=L'Unique (1945-1956) |access-date=2010-02-17 |archive-date=2011-10-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111007040412/http://www.la-presse-anarchiste.net/spip.php?rubrique1 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Within the [[Synthesis anarchism|synthesist]] anarchist organization, the [[Fédération Anarchiste]], there existed an individualist anarchist tendency alongside anarcho-communist and anarchosyndicalist currents.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070930014916/http://public.federation-anarchiste.org/IMG/pdf/Cedric_Guerin_Histoire_du_mvt_libertaire_1950_1970.pdf "Pensée et action des anarchistes en France : 1950–1970" by Cédric GUÉRIN]</ref> Individualist anarchists participating inside the [[Fédération Anarchiste]] included [[Charles-Auguste Bontemps]], Georges Vincey and [[André Arru]].<ref>"Le courant individualiste, qui avait alors peu de rapport avec les théories de [[Charles-Auguste Bontemps]], est une tendance représentée à l'époque par Georges Vincey et avec des nuances par A.Arru"[https://web.archive.org/web/20070930014916/http://public.federation-anarchiste.org/IMG/pdf/Cedric_Guerin_Histoire_du_mvt_libertaire_1950_1970.pdf "Pensée et action des anarchistes en France : 1950–1970" by Cédric GUÉRIN]</ref> The new base principles of the [[Fédération Anarchiste|francophone Anarchist Federation]] were written by the individualist anarchist Charles-Auguste Bontemps and the anarcho-communist Maurice Joyeux which established an organization with a plurality of tendencies and autonomy of federated groups organized around [[Synthesist anarchism|synthesist principles]].<ref name="ephemanar.net">{{Cite web |url=http://www.ephemanar.net/fevrier09.html#9 |title="Charles-Auguste Bontemps" at Ephemeride Anarchiste |access-date=2011-05-23 |archive-date=2012-01-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120126001745/http://www.ephemanar.net/fevrier09.html#9 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Charles-Auguste Bontemps]] was a prolific author mainly in the anarchist, [[freethinking]], pacifist and [[Anarcho-naturism|naturist]] press of the time.<ref name="ephemanar.net"/> His view on anarchism was based around his concept of "Social Individualism" on which he wrote extensively.<ref name="ephemanar.net"/> He defended an anarchist perspective which consisted on "a collectivism of things and an individualism of persons".<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://militants-anarchistes.info/spip.php?article7527&lang=fr |title="BONTEMPS Auguste, Charles, Marcel dit « Charles-Auguste » ; « CHAB » ; « MINXIT »" at ''Dictionnaire International des Militants Anarchistes'' |access-date=2011-10-31 |archive-date=2019-04-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404044808/http://militants-anarchistes.info/spip.php?article7527 |url-status=live }}</ref>

The prolific contemporary French philosopher [[Michel Onfray]] has written from an individualist anarchist perspective.<ref name="regards.fr"/><ref>"Au-delà, l'éthique et la politique de Michel Onfray font signe vers l'anarchisme individualiste de la Belle Epoque qui est d'ailleurs une de ses références explicites."[http://www.revue-interrogations.org/article.php?article=105#5 "Individualité et rapports à l'engagement militant Individualite et rapports a l engageme".. par : Pereira Irène] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120424230958/http://www.revue-interrogations.org/article.php?article=105#5 |date=2012-04-24 }}</ref>

===== Illegalism =====
{{main|Illegalism}}
[[File:Band a bonnot desenho.jpg|thumb|180px|Caricature of the [[Bonnot gang]]]]
Illegalism<ref name="The Illegalists"/> is an anarchist philosophy that developed primarily in France, Italy, Belgium and Switzerland during the early 1900s as an outgrowth of Stirner's individualist anarchism.<ref name="inanrcillegal"/> Illegalists usually did not seek moral basis for their actions, recognizing only the reality of "might" rather than "right"; and for the most part, illegal acts were done simply to satisfy personal desires, not for some greater ideal,<ref name="Parry, Richard 1987. p. 15"/> although some committed crimes as a form of [[propaganda of the deed]].<ref name="The Illegalists"/> The illegalists embraced [[direct action]] and [[propaganda of the deed]].<ref>[http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm The Illegalists] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150908072801/http://recollectionbooks.com/siml/library/illegalistsDougImrie.htm |date=September 8, 2015 }} – by Doug Imrie. Recollectionbooks.com (1954-08-28). Retrieved on 2013-07-12.</ref>

Influenced by theorist Max Stirner's [[Egoist anarchism|egoism]] as well as Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (his view that "[[property is theft!]]"), [[Clément Duval]] and [[Marius Jacob]] proposed the theory of la ''reprise individuelle'' ([[individual reclamation]]) which justified robbery on the rich and personal direct action against exploiters and the system.<ref name="Parry, Richard 1987. p. 15"/>

==== Germany ====
[[File:John Henry Mackay.gif|thumb|left|140px|[[John Henry Mackay]]]]
In Germany, the Scottish-German [[John Henry Mackay]] became the most important propagandist for individualist anarchist ideas. He fused Stirnerist egoism with the positions of Benjamin Tucker and actually translated Tucker into German. Two semi-fictional writings of his own, ''[[Die Anarchisten]]'' and ''[[Der Freiheitsucher]]'', contributed to individualist theory through an updating of egoist themes within a consideration of the anarchist movement. English translations of these works arrived in the United Kingdom and in individualist American circles led by Tucker.<ref name="mckay">[http://tmh.floonet.net/articles/tariley.html "New England Anarchism in Germany" by Thomas A. Riley] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120207130957/http://tmh.floonet.net/articles/tariley.html|date=2012-02-07}}</ref>

[[File:Der Eigene - 1896.jpg|thumb|140px|''[[Der Eigene]]'', Stirnerist pioneer gay activist publication]]
[[Adolf Brand]] was a German [[writer]], [[Philosophy of Max Stirner|Stirnerist]] [[Anarchism|anarchist]] and pioneering [[campaigner]] for the acceptance of male [[bisexuality]] and [[homosexuality]]. In 1896, Brand published a German homosexual periodical, ''[[Der Eigene]]''. This was the first ongoing homosexual publication in the world.<ref>[[Karl Heinrich Ulrichs]] had begun a journal called ''Prometheus'' in 1870, but only one issue was published. (Kennedy, Hubert, ''Karl Heinrich Ulrichs: First Theorist of Homosexuality'', In: 'Science and Homosexualities', ed. Vernon Rosario pp. 26–45). New York: Routledge, 1997.</ref> The name was taken from writings of egoist philosopher [[Max Stirner]] (who had greatly influenced the young Brand) and refers to Stirner's concept of "[[self-ownership]]" of the individual. ''Der Eigene'' concentrated on cultural and scholarly material and may have had an average of around 1,500 subscribers per issue during its lifetime, although the exact numbers are uncertain. Contributors included [[Erich Mühsam]], [[Kurt Hiller]], [[John Henry Mackay]] (under the pseudonym Sagitta) and artists [[Wilhelm von Gloeden]], [[Fidus]] and [[Sascha Schneider]]. Brand contributed many poems and articles himself. [[Benjamin Tucker]] followed this journal from the United States.<ref>"Among the egoist papers that Tucker followed were the German ''[[Der Eigene]]'', edited by [[Adolf Brand]]" - "Benjamin Tucker and Liberty: A Bibliographical Essay" by Wendy McElroy</ref>

''[[Der Einzige]]'' was a German individualist anarchist magazine. It appeared in 1919 as a weekly, then sporadically until 1925 and was edited by cousins Anselm Ruest (pseudonym for Ernst Samuel) and Mynona (pseudonym for [[Salomo Friedlaender]]). Its title was adopted from the book ''{{Lang|de|Der Einzige und sein Eigentum}}'' (''[[The Ego and Its Own]]'') by [[Max Stirner]]. Another influence was the thought of German philosopher [[Friedrich Nietzsche]].<ref>Constantin Parvulescu. [https://search.proquest.com/docview/305304843 ''"Der Einzige" and the making of the radical Left in the early post-World War I Germany''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190725165724/https://search.proquest.com/docview/305304843 |date=2019-07-25 }}. University of Minnesota. 2006]</ref> The publication was connected to the local [[Expressionism|expressionist]] artistic current and the transition from it towards [[Dada]].<ref>"[...] the dadaist objections to Hiller's activism werethemselves present in expressionism as demonstrated by the seminal roles played by the philosophies of [[Otto Gross]] and Salomo Friedlaender". Seth Taylor. ''Left-wing Nietzscheans: the politics of German expressionism, 1910–1920''. Walter De Gruyter Inc. 1990</ref>

==== Italy ====
[[File:Novatore.jpg|thumb|left|150px|[[Renzo Novatore]]]]
In Italy, individualist anarchism had a strong tendency towards illegalism and violent propaganda by the deed similar to French individualist anarchism, but perhaps more extreme<ref name="italyindiv">[https://archive.today/20110929141610/http://ita.anarchopedia.org/anarco-individualismolink "anarco-individualismo" in italian anarchopedia]</ref><ref>"At this point, encouraged by the disillusionment that followed the breakdown of the general strike, the terrorist individualists who had always – despite Malatesta's influence – survived as a small minority among Italian anarchists, intervened frightfully and tragically." [[George Woodcock]]. ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements''. 1962.</ref> and which emphazised criticism of organization be it anarchist or of other type.<ref>"in a dispute with the individualist anarchists of [[Paterson, New Jersey|Paterson]], who insisted that anarchism implied no organization at all, and that every man must act solely on his impulses. At last, in one noisy debate, the individual impulse of a certain Ciancabilla directed him to shoot Malatesta, who was badly wounded but obstinately refused to name his assailant." [[George Woodcock]]. ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements.'' 1962</ref> In this respect, we can consider notorious magnicides carried out or attempted by individualists [[Giovanni Passannante]], [[Sante Caserio]], [[Michele Angiolillo]], [[Luigi Lucheni]] and [[Gaetano Bresci]] who murdered King [[Umberto I]]. Caserio lived in France and coexisted within French illegalism and later assassinated French President [[Sadi Carnot (statesman)|Sadi Carnot]]. The theoretical seeds of current [[insurrectionary anarchism]] were already laid out at the end of 19th century Italy in a combination of individualist anarchism criticism of permanent groups and organization with a socialist class struggle worldview.<ref name="indinss">"Essa trova soprattutto in America del Nord un notevole seguito per opera del Galleani che esprime una sintesi fra l'istanza puramente individualista di stampo anglosassone e americano (ben espressa negli scritti di Tucker) e quella profondamente socialista del movimento anarchico di lingua italiana. Questa commistione di elementi individualisti e comunisti – che caratterizza bene la corrente antiorganizzatrice – rappresenta lo sforzo di quanti avvertirono in modo estremamente sensibile l'invadente burocratismo che pervadeva il movimento operaio e socialista." [http://ita.anarchopedia.org/anarchismo_insurrezionale "Anarchismo insurrezionale"] in Italian anarchopedia {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120709030012/http://ita.anarchopedia.org/anarchismo_insurrezionale |date=2012-07-09 }}</ref>

During the early 20th century, the intellectual work of individualist anarchist [[Renzo Novatore]] came to importance and he was influenced by [[Max Stirner]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], [[Georges Palante]], [[Oscar Wilde]], [[Henrik Ibsen]], [[Arthur Schopenhauer]] and [[Charles Baudelaire]]. He collaborated in numerous anarchist journals and participated in [[futurism]] [[avant-garde]] currents. In his thought, he adhered to Stirnerist disrespect for private property, only recognizing property of one's own spirit.<ref name="novatore-anarchopedia">"Novatore non era contrario all'abolizione della proprietà privata, poiché riteneva che l'unica proprietà inviolabile fosse solo quella spirituale ed etica. Il suo pensiero è esplicitato in "Verso il nulla creatore":
:Bisogna che tutto ciò che si chiama "proprietà materiale", "proprietà privata", "proprietà esteriore" diventi per gli individui ciò che è il sole, la luce, il cielo, il mare, le stelle. E ciò avverrà! Avverrà perché noi – gli iconoclasti – la violenteremo! Solo la ricchezza etica e spirituale è invulnerabile. È vera proprietà dell'individuo. Il resto no! Il resto è vulnerabile! E tutto ciò che è vulnerabile sarà vulnerato."[http://ita.anarchopedia.org/Renzo_Novatore "Renzo Novatore" in italian anarchopedia] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120729185130/http://ita.anarchopedia.org/Renzo_Novatore |date=2012-07-29 }}</ref> Novatore collaborated in the individualist anarchist journal ''Iconoclasta!'' alongside the young [[Philosophy of Max Stirner|Stirner]]ist [[Illegalism|illegalist]] [[Bruno Filippi]].<ref name="rebel's dark">{{Cite web |url=http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Bruno_Filippi__The_rebel_s_dark_laughter__the_writings_of_Bruno_Filippi.html |title=''The rebel's dark laughter: the writings of Bruno Filippi'' |access-date=2010-02-27 |archive-date=2023-02-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230202163710/https://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Bruno_Filippi__The_rebel_s_dark_laughter__the_writings_of_Bruno_Filippi.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

The individualist philosopher and poet [[Renzo Novatore]] belonged to the leftist section of the avant-garde movement of futurism<ref>[http://www.novatore.it/Una_biografia.html Novatore: una biografia] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110722043805/http://www.novatore.it/Una_biografia.html |date=2011-07-22 }}</ref> alongside other individualist anarcho-futurists such as [[Dante Carnesecchi]], [[Leda Rafanelli]], [[Auro d'Arcola]] and Giovanni Governato. There was also [[Pietro Bruzzi]] who published the journal ''L'Individualista'' in the 1920s alongside Ugo Fedeli and Francesco Ghezzi, but who fell to fascist forces later.<ref>[http://recollectionbooks.com/bleed/gallery/galleryindex.htm#Indivi-dualista "L'Indivi-dualista"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110819002818/http://recollectionbooks.com/bleed/gallery/galleryindex.htm#Indivi-dualista |date=August 19, 2011 }}</ref><ref name="ita.anarchopedia.org">{{Cite web |url=http://ita.anarchopedia.org/Pietro_Bruzzi |title="Pietro Bruzzi" at italian anarchopedia |access-date=2011-08-16 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120630033239/http://ita.anarchopedia.org/Pietro_Bruzzi |archive-date=2012-06-30 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Bruzzi also collaborated with the Italian American individualist anarchist publication ''Eresia'' of [[New York City]].<ref name="ita.anarchopedia.org"/>

During the Founding Congress of the [[Italian Anarchist Federation]] in 1945, there was a group of individualist anarchists led by Cesare Zaccaria<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ita.anarchopedia.org/Storia_del_movimento_libertario_in_Italia |title="Storia del movimento libertario in Italia" in anarchopedia in Italian |access-date=2010-02-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180921115020/http://ita.anarchopedia.org/Storia_del_movimento_libertario_in_Italia |archive-date=2018-09-21 |url-status=dead }}</ref> who was an important anarchist of the time.<ref>Pier Carlo Masini; Paul Sharkey. [http://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/73n6nh "Cesare Zaccaria (19 August 1897 – October 1961)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180213135335/https://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/73n6nh |date=13 February 2018 }}.</ref> Later during the IX Congress of the [[Italian Anarchist Federation]] in [[Carrara]] in 1965, a group decided to split off from this organization and created the {{Lang|it|Gruppi di Iniziativa Anarchica}}. In the 1970s, it was mostly composed of "veteran individualist anarchists with an of [[anarcho-pacifism|pacifism]] orientation, [[anarcho-naturism|naturism]]".<ref>"Los anarco-individualistas, G.I.A.&nbsp;... Una escisión de la FAI producida en el IX Congreso (Carrara, 1965) se pr odujo cuando un sector de anarquistas de tendencia humanista rechazan la interpretación que ellos juzgan disciplinaria del "pacto asociativo" clásico, y crean los GIA (Gruppi di Iniziativa Anarchica). Esta pequeña federación de grupos, hoy nutrida sobre todo de veteranos anarco-individualistas de orientación pacifista, naturista, etcétera defiende la autonomía personal y rechaza a rajatabla toda forma de intervención en los procesos del sistema, como sería por ejemplo el sindicalismo. Su portavoz es L'Internazionale con sede en Ancona. La escisión de los GIA prefiguraba, en sentido contrario, el gran debate que pronto había de comenzar en el seno del movimiento". [http://eljorobado.enlucha.info/bicicleta/bicicleta/ciclo/01/17.htm "El movimiento libertario en Italia"] by ''Bicicleta, revista de comunicaciones libertarias'' Year 1 No. Noviembre, 1 1977] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131012054206/http://eljorobado.enlucha.info/bicicleta/bicicleta/ciclo/01/17.htm |date=October 12, 2013 }}</ref>

The contemporary imprisoned Italian insurrectionary anarchist philosopher [[:it:Michele Fabiani#Chi è Michele Fabiani|Michele Fabiani]] writes from an explicit individualist anarchist perspective in such essays as {{Lang|it|Critica individualista anarchica alla modernità}} ("Individualist Anarchist Critique of Modernity").<ref>[http://www.anarchaos.it/?p=184 "Critica individualista anarchica alla modernità"] by Michele Fabiani {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090909052618/http://www.anarchaos.it/?p=184 |date=2009-09-09 }}</ref> [[Horst Fantazzini]] (March 4, 1939 – December 24, 2001)<ref name="Horst Biography">{{Cite web |url=http://www.horstfantazzini.net/biography.htm |title="Horst Biography" |access-date=2012-07-24 |archive-date=2012-03-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120301021800/http://www.horstfantazzini.net/biography.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> was an Italian-German individualist anarchist<ref>"He always considered himself an individualist anarchist."[http://www.horstfantazzini.net/biography.htm "Horst Biography"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120301021800/http://www.horstfantazzini.net/biography.htm |date=2012-03-01 }}</ref> who pursued an illegalist lifestyle and practice until his death in 2001. He gained media notoriety mainly due to his many bank robberies through Italy and other countries.<ref name="Horst Biography"/> In 1999, the film ''[[Ormai è fatta!]]'' appeared based on his life.<ref>[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0177073/ "Ormai è fatta!"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210914031311/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0177073/ |date=2021-09-14 }} (1999) at the IMDB.</ref>

==== Russia ====
Individualist anarchism was one of the three categories of [[anarchism in Russia]], along with the more prominent [[anarcho-communism]] and [[anarcho-syndicalism]].<ref name=avruss>{{cite book | author-link=Paul Avrich |last = Avrich | first = Paul | title = The Russian Anarchists | publisher = [[AK Press]] | location = Stirling | year = 2006 | isbn = 1904859488 |page=56 |title-link = The Russian Anarchists }}</ref> The ranks of the Russian individualist anarchists were predominantly drawn from the [[intelligentsia]] and the [[working class]].<ref name=avruss/> For anarchist historian [[Paul Avrich]], "[t]he two leading exponents of individualist anarchism, both based in [[Moscow]], were [[Alexei Borovoi|Aleksei Alekseevich Borovoi]] and [[Lev Chernyi]] (born Pavel Dmitrievich Turchaninov). From Nietzsche, they inherited the desire for a complete overturn of all values accepted by bourgeois society political, moral, and cultural. Furthermore, strongly influenced by Max Stirner and Benjamin Tucker, the German and American theorists of individualist anarchism, they demanded the total liberation of the human personality from the fetters of organized society".<ref name=avruss/>

Some Russian individualists anarchists "found the ultimate expression of their [[social alienation]] in violence and crime, others attached themselves to avant-garde literary and artistic circles, but the majority remained "[[Philosophical anarchism|philosophical]]" anarchists who conducted animated parlor discussions and elaborated their individualist theories in ponderous journals and books".<ref name=avruss/>

Lev Chernyi was an important individualist anarchist involved in resistance against the rise to power of the [[Bolshevik Party]] as he adhered mainly to Stirner and the ideas of Tucker. In 1907, he published a book entitled ''Associational Anarchism'' in which he advocated the "free association of independent individuals".<ref name="chernyi">[http://flag.blackened.net/liberty/libertarians.html "Prominent Anarchists and Left-Libertarians"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101028163000/http://flag.blackened.net/liberty/libertarians.html |date=2010-10-28 }}</ref> On his return from Siberia in 1917, he enjoyed great popularity among Moscow workers as a lecturer. Chernyi was also Secretary of the Moscow Federation of Anarchist Groups, which was formed in March 1917.<ref name="chernyi"/> He was an advocate "for the seizure of private homes",<ref name="chernyi"/> which was an activity seen by the anarchists after the October Revolution as direct expropriation on the bourgoise. He died after being accused of participation in an episode in which this group bombed the headquarters of the Moscow Committee of the Communist Party. Although most likely not being really involved in the bombing, he might have died of torture.<ref name="chernyi"/>

Chernyi advocated a [[Nietzschean]] [[Transvaluation of values|overthrow of the values]] of bourgeois Russian society, and rejected the voluntary [[Mir (social)|communes]] of anarcho-communist [[Peter Kropotkin]] as a threat to the freedom of the individual.<ref name=Avrich180>{{Harvnb|Avrich|2006|p=180}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Avrich|2006|p=254}}</ref><ref name=aa>{{cite book |last=Chernyi |first=Lev |title=Novoe Napravlenie v Anarkhizme: Asosiatsionnii Anarkhism |orig-year=1907 |edition=Moscow; 2nd |year=1923 |publisher=New York }}</ref> Scholars including Avrich and Allan Antliff have interpreted this vision of society to have been greatly influenced by the individualist anarchists Max Stirner and Benjamin Tucker.<ref name=sub>{{cite journal |last=Antliff |first=Allan |year=2007 |title=Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism |journal=SubStance |volume=36 |issue=113 |pages=56–66 |url=https://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/substance/v036/36.2antliff.pdf |access-date=2008-03-10 |doi=10.1353/sub.2007.0026 |s2cid=146156609 |archive-date=2016-04-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160408210526/https://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/substance/v036/36.2antliff.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Subsequent to the book's publication, Chernyi was imprisoned in Siberia under the Russian [[Czar]]ist regime for his revolutionary activities.<ref name=match>{{cite journal|last=Phillips |first=Terry |date=Fall 1984 |journal=[[The Match!]] |url=http://recollectionbooks.com/bleed/Encyclopedia/ChernyiLev.htm |issue=79 |access-date=2008-03-10 |title=Lev Chernyi |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080211173334/http://recollectionbooks.com/bleed/Encyclopedia/ChernyiLev.htm |archive-date=2008-02-11 }}</ref>

On the other hand, [[Alexei Borovoi]]<ref name="quod.lib.umich.edu">[http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=labadie;cc=labadie;view=toc;idno=2917084.0001.001 "Anarchism and Law"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140201152645/http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=labadie;cc=labadie;view=toc;idno=2917084.0001.001 |date=2014-02-01 }} on Anarchism Pamphlets in the Labadie Collection.</ref> was a professor of philosophy at Moscow University, "a gifted orator and the author of numerous books, pamphlets, and articles which attempted to reconcile individualist anarchism with the doctrines of syndicallism".<ref name="chernyi"/> He wrote among other theoretical works ''Anarkhizm'' in 1918, just after the October Revolution;<ref name="chernyi"/> and ''Anarchism and Law''.<ref name="quod.lib.umich.edu"/> For him, "the chief importance is given not to Anarchism as the aim but to [[Anarchy]] as the continuous quest for the aim".<ref name="katesharpleylibrary.net">[http://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/228105 Alexei Borovoi (from individualism to the Platform)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604144215/http://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/228105 |date=2011-06-04 }} by Anatoly Dubovik.</ref> He manifests there that "[n]o social ideal, from the point of view of anarchism, could be referred to as absolute in a sense that supposes it's the crown of human wisdom, the end of social and ethical quest of man".<ref name="katesharpleylibrary.net"/>

==== Spain ====
While Spain was influenced by American individualist anarchism, it was more closely related to the French currents. Around the start of the 20th century, individualism in Spain gathered force through the efforts of people such as Dorado Montero, [[Ricardo Mella]], [[Federico Urales]], [[Miguel Giménez Igualada]], Mariano Gallardo and J. Elizalde who translated French and American individualists.<ref name="frenchexperimentation"/> Important in this respect were also magazines such as ''La Idea Libre'', ''[[La Revista Blanca]]'', ''Etica'', ''[[Iniciales]]'', ''Al margen'', ''Estudios'' and ''Nosotros''. The most influential thinkers there were [[Max Stirner]], [[Émile Armand]] and [[Han Ryner]]. Just as in France, the spread of [[Esperanto]] and [[anationalism]] had importance just as [[naturism]] and [[free love]] currents.<ref name="frenchexperimentation"/> Later, Armand and Ryner themselves started writing in the Spanish individualist press. Armand's concept of amorous camaraderie had an important role in motivating [[polyamory]] as realization of the individual.<ref name="frenchexperimentation"/>

Catalan historian Xavier Diez reports that the Spanish individualist anarchist press was widely read by members of [[anarcho-communist]] groups and by members of the [[anarcho-syndicalist]] trade union [[Confederación Nacional del Trabajo|CNT]]. There were also the cases of prominent individualist anarchists such as [[Federico Urales]] and [[Miguel Giménez Igualada]] who were members of the CNT and J. Elizalde who was a founding member and first secretary of the [[Federación Anarquista Ibérica|Iberian Anarchist Federation]] (IAF).<ref>Xavier Diez. ''El anarquismo individualista en España: 1923–1938''. {{ISBN|978-84-96044-87-6}}.</ref>

Spanish individualist anarchist [[Miguel Giménez Igualada]] wrote the lengthy theory book called ''Anarchism'' espousing his individualist anarchism.<ref>[http://www.slideshare.net/guest8dcd3f/anarquismo-miguel-gimenez-igualada "Anarquismo"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120311020600/http://www.slideshare.net/guest8dcd3f/anarquismo-miguel-gimenez-igualada |date=2012-03-11 }} by por [[Miguel Giménez Igualada]].</ref> Between October 1937 and February 1938, he was editor of the individualist anarchist magazine ''Nosotros''<ref name="spain"/> in which many works of Armand and Ryner appeared. He also participated in the publishing of another individualist anarchist maganize ''Al Margen: Publicación quincenal individualista''.<ref name="spain2">"Entre los redactores y colaboradores de Al Margen, que trasladará su redacción a Elda, en Alicante, encontraremos a Miguel Giménez Igualada&nbsp;..." [http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf "La insumisión voluntaira: El anarquismo individualista español durante la dictadura y la segunda república (1923–1938)"] by Xavier Diez {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |date=July 23, 2011 }}</ref> In his youth, he engaged in illegalist activities.{{sfn|Díez|2007}} His thought was deeply influenced by Max Stirner, of which he was the main popularizer in Spain through his own writings. He published and wrote the preface<ref name="spain"/> to the fourth edition in Spanish of ''[[The Ego and Its Own]]'' from 1900. He proposed the creation of a "[[Union of egoists]]" to be a federation of individualist anarchists in Spain, but it did not succeed.<ref name="spain3">"A partir de la década de los treinta, su pensamiento empieza a derivar hacia el individualismo, y como profundo estirneriano tratará de impulsar una federación de individualistas"[http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf "La insumisión voluntaira: El anarquismo individualista español durante la dictadura y la segunda reppública(1923–1938) por Xavier Diez] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723130358/http://www.acracia.org/1-23a58lainsumision.pdf |date=July 23, 2011 }}</ref> In 1956, he published an extensive treatise on Stirner, dedicated to fellow individualist anarchist Émile Armand.<ref name="kclibertaria.comyr.com">[http://www.kclibertaria.comyr.com/lpdf/l147.pdf "Stirner"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110917211448/http://www.kclibertaria.comyr.com/lpdf/l147.pdf |date=2011-09-17 }} by Miguel Gimenez Igualada.</ref> Afterwards, he traveled and lived in Argentina, Uruguay and Mexico.{{sfn|Díez|2007}}

[[Federico Urales]] was an important individualist anarchist who edited ''[[La Revista Blanca]]''. The individualist anarchism of Urales was influenced by [[Auguste Comte]] and [[Charles Darwin]]. He saw science and reason as a defense against blind servitude to authority. He was critical of influential individualist thinkers such as Nietzsche and Stirner for promoting an asocial egoist individualism and instead promoted an individualism with solidarity seen as a way to guarantee social equality and harmony. He was highly critical of [[anarcho-syndicalism]], which he viewed as plagued by excessive bureaucracy; and he thought that it tended towards reformism. Instead, he favored small groups based on ideological alignment. He supported and participated in the establishment of the IAF in 1927.{{sfn|Díez|2007}}

In 1956, [[Miguel Giménez Igualada]]—on exile escaping from [[Francisco Franco|Franco's dictatorship]]—published an extensive treatise on Stirner which he dedicated to fellow individualist anarchist Émile Armand.<ref name="kclibertaria.comyr.com"/> On the subject of individualist anarchist theory, he publisheds ''Anarchism'' in 1968 during his exile in Mexico from Franco's dictatorship in Spain.<ref>[http://www.antorcha.net/biblioteca_virtual/filosofia/igualada/caratula.html "Anarquismo"] by Miguel Gimenez Igualada.</ref> He was present in the First Congress of the Mexican Anarchist Federation in 1945.<ref>[http://www.antorcha.net/biblioteca_virtual/filosofia/igualada/indice.html "Anarchismo"] by Miguel Giménez Igualada.</ref>

In 2000, Ateneo Libertario Ricardo Mella, Ateneo Libertario Al Margen, Ateneu Enciclopèdic Popular, Ateneo Libertario de Sant Boi and Ateneu Llibertari Poble Sec y Fundació D'Estudis Llibertaris i Anarcosindicalistes republished Émile Armand's writings on free love and individualist anarchism in a compilation titled ''Individualist anarchism and Amorous camaraderie''.<ref>[http://sindominio.net/etcetera/PUBLICACIONES/con_otros/Armand.doc "Individualismo anarquista y camaradería amorosa"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090719041733/http://www.sindominio.net/etcetera/PUBLICACIONES/con_otros/Armand.doc |date=2009-07-19 }} by [[Émile Armand]]</ref> Recently, Spanish historian Xavier Diez has dedicated extensive research on Spanish individualist anarchism as can be seen in his books ''El anarquismo individualista en España: 1923–1938''<ref name="spanish">[http://libros.metabiblioteca.org/handle/001/450 "El anarquismo individualista en España"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210323075247/https://libros.metabiblioteca.org/handle/001/450 |date=2021-03-23 }} by Xavier Diez.</ref> and ''Utopia sexual a la premsa anarquista de Catalunya. La revista Ética-Iniciales (1927–1937)'' which deals with free love thought as present in the Spanish individualist anarchist magazine ''[[Iniciales]]''.<ref name="iniciales">{{Cite book |last1=Díez |first1=Xavier |title=Utopia sexual a la premsa anarquista de Catalunya: la revista Ética-Iniciales, 1927-1937 |date=2001 |publisher=Pagès Editors |isbn=978-84-7935-715-3 |df=mdy-all }}</ref>

==== United Kingdom ====
[[File:Oscar Wilde by Napoleon Sarony. Three-quarter-length photograph, seated.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Oscar Wilde]], famous anarchist Irish writer of the [[decadent movement]] and famous [[dandy]]]]
The English [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] [[political theorist]] [[William Godwin]] was an important influence as mentioned before.<ref name="woodcock20"/> The Irish [[anarchism|anarchist]] writer of the [[Decadent movement|Decadent Movement]] [[Oscar Wilde]] influenced individualist anarchists such as [[Renzo Novatore]]<ref>"We must kill the christian philosophy in the most radical sense of the word. How much mostly goes sneaking inside the democratic civilization (this most cynically ferocious form of christian depravity) and it goes more towards the categorical negation of human Individuality. "Democracy! By now we have comprised it that it means all that says Oscar Wilde Democracy is the people who govern the people with blows of the club for love of the people"." [http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Renzo_Novatore__Towards_the_Hurricane.html "Towards the Hurricane"] by [[Renzo Novatore]]</ref> and gained the admiration of [[Benjamin Tucker]].<ref>"When Oscar Wilde's plea for penal reform, The Ballad of Reading Gaol, was widely criticized, Tucker enthusiastically endorsed the poem, urging all of his subscribers to read it. Tucker, in fact, published an American edition. From its early championing of Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass to a series of short stories by Francis du Bosque in its last issues, ''Liberty'' was a vehicle of controversial, avant-garde literature."[https://books.google.com/books?id=DdHseFmQiSUC "Benjamin Tucker, Individualism, & Liberty: Not the Daughter but the Mother of Order" by Wendy McElroy]</ref> In his important essay ''[[The Soul of Man under Socialism]]'' from 1891, Wilde defended socialism as the way to guarantee individualism and so he saw that "[w]ith the abolition of private property, then, we shall have true, beautiful, healthy Individualism. Nobody will waste his life in accumulating things, and the symbols for things. One will live. To live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all".<ref>[http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/hist_texts/wilde_soul.html "The Soul of Man under Socialism" by Oscar Wilde] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130914032335/http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/hist_texts/wilde_soul.html|date=2013-09-14}}</ref> For anarchist historian [[George Woodcock]], "Wilde's aim in ''The Soul of Man under Socialism'' is to seek the society most favorable to the artist [...] for Wilde art is the supreme end, containing within itself enlightenment and regeneration, to which all else in society must be subordinated [...] Wilde represents the anarchist as [[aesthete]]".<ref name="Anarchism 1962. p. 447">[[George Woodcock]]. ''Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements.'' 1962. (p. 447)</ref> Woodcock finds that "[t]he most ambitious contribution to literary anarchism during the 1890s was undoubtedly Oscar Wilde ''The Soul of Man under Socialism''" and finds that it is influenced mainly by the thought of William Godwin.<ref name="Anarchism 1962. p. 447"/>

In the late 19th century in the United Kingdom, there existed individualist anarchists such as [[Wordsworth Donisthorpe]], Joseph Hiam Levy, Joseph Greevz Fisher, John Badcock Jr., Albert Tarn and [[Henry Albert Seymour]]<ref name="UK">{{Cite web |url=http://www.uncletaz.com/liberty/english.html |title="The English Individualists As They Appear In Liberty" by Carl Watner |access-date=2010-02-12 |archive-date=2009-05-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090516053751/http://uncletaz.com/liberty/english.html |url-status=live }}</ref> who were close to the United States group around Benjamin Tucker's magazine ''Liberty''. In the mid-1880s, Seymour published a journal called ''The Anarchist''<ref name="UK"/> and also later took a special interest in free love as he participated in the journal ''The Adult: A Journal for the Advancement of Freedom in Sexual Relationships''.<ref name="UK"/> ''The Serpent'', issued from London, was the most prominent English-language egoist journal and published from 1898 to 1900 with the subtitle "A Journal of Egoistic Philosophy and Sociology".<ref name="mcelroy">McElroy, Wendy. [https://web.archive.org/web/20020601050034/http://libertariannation.org/a/f62m1.html "Benjamin Tucker and Liberty: A Bibliographical Essay by Wendy McElroy"]</ref> [[Henry Meulen]] was another British anarchist who was notable for his support of [[free banking]].

In the United Kingdom, [[Herbert Read]] was influenced highly by [[Egoist anarchism|egoism]] as he later approached [[existentialism]] (see existentialist anarchism).<ref name="herbert read">''Herbert Read Reassessed'' by David Goodway. Liverpool University Press. 1998. p. 190.</ref> [[Albert Camus]] devoted a section of ''[[The Rebel (book)|The Rebel]]'' to Stirner. Although throughout his book Camus is concerned to present "the rebel" as a preferred alternative to "the revolutionary", he nowhere acknowledges that this distinction is taken from the one that Stirner makes between "the revolutionary" and "the [[insurrectionary anarchism|insurrectionist]]".<ref name="camus">{{Cite web |url=http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/00/pwillen1/lit/egomax.htm |title="The Egoism of Max Stirner" by Sidney Parker |access-date=2010-02-08 |archive-date=2010-01-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100116034701/http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/00/pwillen1/lit/egomax.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Sidney Parker (anarchist)|Sidney Parker]] is a British egoist individualist anarchist who wrote articles and edited anarchist journals from 1963 to 1993 such as ''Minus One'', ''Egoist'', and ''Ego''.<ref>[http://www.nonserviam.com/egoistarchive/SidParker/ "Sid Parker" by nonserviam.com] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040127034703/http://www.nonserviam.com/egoistarchive/SidParker/|date=2004-01-27}}</ref> [[Donald Rooum]] is an English anarchist [[cartoonist]] and writer with a long association with [[Freedom Press]]. Rooum stated that for his thought, "[t]he most influential source is Max Stirner. I am happy to be called a Stirnerite anarchist, provided 'Stirnerite' means one who agrees with Stirner's general drift, not one who agrees with Stirner's every word".<ref>Donald Rooum: ''Anarchism and Selfishness.'' In: The Raven. Anarchist Quarterly (London), vol. 1, n. 3 (nov. 1987), pp. 251–59 (here 259)</ref> ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]'' reports: "From meeting anarchists in Glasgow during the Second World War, long-time anarchist activist and artist Donald Rooum likewise combined Stirner and anarcho-communism".<ref>[http://www.infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionG6 "G.6. What are the ideas of Max Stirner"], {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140910195617/http://www.infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionG6|date=2014-09-10}} in ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]''.</ref>

In the hybrid of [[post-structuralism]] and anarchism called [[post-anarchism]], [[Saul Newman]] has written a lot on Stirner and his similarities to post-structuralism. He writes:
<blockquote>Max Stirner's impact on contemporary political theory is often neglected. However in Stirner's political thinking there can be found a surprising convergence with poststructuralist theory, particularly with regard to the function of power. [[Andrew Koch]], for instance, sees Stirner as a thinker who transcends the Hegelian tradition he is usually placed in, arguing that his work is a precursor poststructuralist ideas about the foundations of knowledge and truth.<ref name="newman">[http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Saul_Newman__War_on_the_State__Stirner_and_Deleuze_s_Anarchism.html "War on the State: Stirner and Deleuze's Anarchism"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100426000829/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Saul_Newman__War_on_the_State__Stirner_and_Deleuze_s_Anarchism.html |date=2010-04-26 }} by [[Saul Newman]]</ref></blockquote>

Newman has published several essays on Stirner. "War on the State: Stirner and Deleuze's Anarchism"<ref name="newman"/> and "Empiricism, Pluralism, and Politics in Deleuze and Stirner"<ref name="stirnerdeleuze">"Empiricism, Pluralism, and Politics in Deleuze and Stirner" by Saul Newman</ref> discusses what he sees are similarities between Stirner's thought and that of [[Gilles Deleuze]]. In "Spectres of Stirner: A Contemporary Critique of Ideology", he discusses the conception of ideology in Stirner.<ref name="ideology">[http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/index/56DPQVBRX1J5LRYE.pdf "Spectres of Stirner: A Contemporary Critique of Ideology"]</ref> In "Stirner and Foucault: Toward a Post-Kantian Freedom", similarities between Stirner and [[Michel Foucault]].<ref>"Stirner and Foucault: Toward a Post-Kantian Freedom</ref> He also wrote "Politics of the Ego: Stirner's Critique of Liberalism".<ref>{{cite journal|last=Newman|first=Saul|year=2002|title=Politics of the Ego: Stirner's Critique of Liberalism|journal=Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy|volume=5|issue=3|pages=1–26|doi=10.1080/13698230410001702632|s2cid=144506564}}</ref>

=== Individualist anarchism in Latin America ===
Argentine anarchist historian [[Ángel Cappelletti]] reports that in Argentina "[a]mong the workers that came from Europe in the 2 first decades of the century, there was curiously some stirnerian individualists influenced by the philosophy of [[Nietzsche]], that saw syndicalism as a potential enemy of anarchist ideology. They established [...] [[affinity groups]] that in 1912 came to, according to [[Max Nettlau]], to the number of 20. In 1911 there appeared, in [[Colón, Buenos Aires|Colón]], the periodical ''El Único'', that defined itself as 'Publicación individualista'".<ref>{{Cite book | language = es | url = https://archive.org/details/pdfy-UPmBFnn3MElKSWNg | quote = anarquismo nietzsche. | title = El Anarquismo en América Latina | publisher = Fundacion Biblioteca Ayacuch | first1 = Carlos M | last1 = Rama | first2 = Ángel J | last2 = Cappellett | page = CLVII | isbn = 9789802761173 | year = 1990 }}</ref>

Vicente Rojas Lizcano, whose pseudonym was [[Biofilo Panclasta|Biófilo Panclasta]], was a Colombian individualist anarchist writer and activist. In 1904, he began using the name Biofilo Panclasta. ''Biofilo'' in Spanish stands for "lover of life" and ''Panclasta'' for "enemy of all".<ref>{{Cite journal | last = Panclasta  | first = Biófilo | year = 1928 | title = Comprimidos psicológicos de los revolucionarios criollos | journal = Periódico Claridad | place = Bogotá | language = es | pages = 52–56 }}.</ref> He visited more than fifty countries propagandizing for anarchism which in his case was highly influenced by the thought of Stirner and Nietszche. Among his written works there are ''Siete años enterrado vivo en una de las mazmorras de Gomezuela: Horripilante relato de un resucitado'' (1932) and ''Mis prisiones, mis destierros y mi vida'' (1929) which talk about his many adventures while living his life as an adventurer, activist and [[Vagabond (person)|vagabond]] as well as his thought and the many times he was imprisoned in different countries.

[[File:Mlacerda.png|thumb|150px|[[Maria Lacerda de Moura]], individualist [[anarcha-feminist]]]]
[[Maria Lacerda de Moura]] was a Brazilian teacher, journalist, [[anarcha-feminist]] and [[individualist anarchist]]. Her ideas regarding education were largely influenced by [[Francisco Ferrer]]. She later moved to [[São Paulo]] and became involved in journalism for the anarchist and labor press. There she also lectured on topics including education, [[women's rights]], [[free love]] and [[antimilitarism]]. Her writings and essays garnered her attention not only in Brazil, but also in Argentina and Uruguay. In February 1923, she launched ''Renascença'', a periodical linked with the [[Anarchism|anarchist]], [[progressivism|progressive]] and [[Freethought|freethinking]] circles of the period. Her thought was mainly influenced by individualist anarchists such as [[Han Ryner]] and [[Émile Armand]].<ref name="nodo50.org"/> She maintained contact with Spanish individualist anarchist circles.<ref name="frenchexperimentation"/>

[[Horst Matthai Quelle]] was a Spanish language German anarchist philosopher influenced by Max Stirner.<ref name="books.google.com.ec">[https://books.google.com/books?id=E6JFPiDRlikC&q=horst+matthai+el+humanismo+como+problema+humano&pg=PA345 Horst Matthai Quelle. ''Textos Filosóficos (1989–1999)''. p. 15]</ref> In 1938, at the beginning of the German economic crisis and the rise of [[Nazism]] and [[fascism]] in Europe, Quelle moved to Mexico. Quelle earned his undergraduate degree, [[master's degree|master's]] and [[doctorate]] in philosophy at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, where he returned as a professor of philosophy in the 1980s. He argued that since the individual gives form to the world, he is those objects, the others and the whole universe.<ref name="books.google.com.ec"/> One of his main views was a "theory of infinite worlds" which for him was developed by [[Pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratic philosophers]].<ref name="books.google.com.ec"/>

During the 1990s in Argentina, there appeared a [[Philosophy of Max Stirner|Stirnerist]] publication called ''El Único: publicacion periódica de pensamiento individualista''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elunico.org.ar/indice.html |title=El Único: publicacion periódica de pensamiento individualista |language=es |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100305055716/http://www.elunico.org.ar/indice.html |archive-date=2010-03-05 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web | url = http://raforum.info/spip.php?article261&lang=fr | title = Argentinian anarchist periodicals | publisher = RA Forum | access-date = 2013-12-08 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131211054442/http://raforum.info/spip.php?article261&lang=fr | archive-date = 2013-12-11 | url-status = dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://espora.org/biblioweb/bitacora.html#parte7_3 | title = Bitácora de la Utopía: Anarquismo para el Siglo XXI | first1 = Nelson | last1 = Méndez | first2 = Alfredo | last2 = Vallota | access-date = 2010-02-19 | archive-date = 2009-04-24 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090424151930/http://espora.org/biblioweb/bitacora.html#parte7_3 | url-status = live }}</ref>

== Criticism ==
{{see also|Criticism of anarchism}}
[[File:George bernard shaw.jpg|thumb|125px|[[George Bernard Shaw]] expressed doubts about the [[distribution of wealth]] under individualist anarchism.]]
[[Murray Bookchin]] criticized individualist anarchism for its opposition to [[democracy]] and its embrace of "[[Lifestyle anarchism|lifestylism]]"<ref>{{cite book|last=Bookchin|first=Murray|title=Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism|publisher=AK Press|location=Stirling|year=1995|isbn=9781873176832|title-link=Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism}}</ref> at the expense of [[anti-capitalism]] and [[class struggle]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Morris |first1=Brian |chapter=The Political Legacy of Murray Bookchin |title=Anthropology, Ecology, and Anarchism: A Brian Morris Reader |date=2014 |isbn=978-1-60486-986-6 |publisher=[[PM Press]] |df=mdy-all |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=p7VHEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT264 |pages=169–170 }}</ref> Bookchin claimed that individualist anarchism supports only [[negative liberty]] and rejects the idea of [[positive liberty]].<ref>Bookchin, Murray. "Communalism: The Democratic Dimensions of Social Anarchism". ''Anarchism, Marxism and the Future of the Left: Interviews and Essays, 1993–1998''. [[AK Press]], 1999, p. 155.</ref> [[Albert Meltzer]] proposed that individualist anarchism differs radically from revolutionary anarchism and that it "is sometimes too readily conceded 'that this is, after all, anarchism'". Meltzer claimed that [[Benjamin Tucker]]'s acceptance of the use of a private police force (including to break up violent strikes to protect the "employer's 'freedom'") is contradictory to the definition of anarchism as "no government". Meltzer opposed [[anarcho-capitalism]] for similar reasons, arguing that it actually supports a "limited State" and that "it is only possible to conceive of Anarchism which is free, communistic and offering no economic necessity for repression of countering it".<ref>[[Albert Meltzer|Meltzer, Albert]]. ''Anarchism: Arguments For and Against''. AK Press, 2000. pp. 114–115.</ref> Tucker's views of strikes and trade unions evolved from skepticism,<ref>{{cite journal|author=Victor Yarros|title=Philosophical Anarchism: Its Rise, Decline, and Eclipse|year=1936|journal=[[The American Journal of Sociology]]|volume=41|issue=4|pages=470–483|doi=10.1086/217188|s2cid=145311911|author-link=Victor Yarros}}</ref> believing that strikes should be organized by free workers rather than by bureaucratic union officials and organizations,<ref>Tucker, Benjamin (April 1, 1881). ''Liberty''.</ref> to sympathize with those involved in the [[Haymarket massacre]].<ref>Tucker, Benjamin (1893). ''Instead of a Book, By a Man Too Busy to Write One''. "After Nestor: The Chicago Martyrs".</ref>

[[George Bernard Shaw]] initially had flirtations with individualist anarchism before coming to the conclusion that it was "the negation of socialism, and is, in fact, unsocialism carried as near to its logical conclusion as any sane man dare carry it". Shaw's argument was that even if wealth was initially distributed equally, the degree of ''[[laissez-faire]]'' advocated by Tucker would result in the distribution of wealth becoming unequal because it would permit private appropriation and accumulation.<ref>Griffith, Gareth. ''Socialism and Superior Brain: The Political Thought of George Bernard Shaw''. Routledge (UK). 1993. p. 310.</ref> According to Carlotta Anderson, American individualist anarchists accept that free competition results in unequal wealth distribution, but they "do not see that as an injustice".<ref>Anderson, Carlotta R. ''All-American Anarchist: Joseph A. Labadie and the Labor Movement'', Wayne State University Press, 1998, p. 250.</ref> Tucker explained that "[i]f I go through life free and rich, I shall not cry because my neighbor, equally free, is richer. Liberty will ultimately make all men rich; it will not make all men equally rich. Authority may (and may not) make all men equally rich in purse; it certainly will make them equally poor in all that makes life best worth living".<ref>Tucker, Benjamin. ''Economic Rent''.</ref> Nonetheless, [[Peter Marshall (author)|Peter Marshall]] states that "the egalitarian implications of traditional individualist anarchists" such as Tucker and [[Lysander Spooner]] have been overlooked.<ref name="Marshall 1992">Marshall, Peter (1992). ''Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism''. London: HarperCollins. pp. 564–565. {{ISBN|978-0-00-217855-6}}.</ref>

[[Collectivist anarchism|Collectivist]] and [[social anarchist]]s dispute the individualist anarchist claim that free competition and markets would yield the [[libertarian]]-[[egalitarian]] [[anarchist society]] that individualist anarchists share with them. In their views, "state intervention merely props up a system of class exploitation and gives capitalism a human face".<ref>Heywood, Andrew (16 February 2017). "Anarchism". Political Ideologies: An Introduction (6th ed.). London: Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 146. {{ISBN|9781137606044}}. "Collectivist anarchists argue that state intervention merely props up a system of class exploitation and gives capitalism a human face. Individualist anarchists suggest that intervention distorts the competitive market and creates economies dominated by both public and private monopolies."</ref>

The authors of ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]'' argue that individualist anarchists did not advocate free competition and markets as normative claims and merely thought those were better means than the ones proposed by [[anarcho-communists]] for the development of an anarchist society. Individualist anarchists such as Tucker thought interests, profits, rents and usury would disappear, something that both anarcho-capitalists such as [[Murray Rothbard]]<ref>Rothbard, Murray (2000) [1965]. [https://cdn.mises.org/20_1_2.pdf "The Spooner-Tucker Doctrine: An Economist's View"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201130135410/https://cdn.mises.org/20_1_2.pdf |date=2020-11-30 }}. ''Journal of Libertarian Studies''. Auburn: Mises Institute. '''20''' (1): 5–15.</ref> and social anarchists did not think was true or believe would not happen. In a free market, people would be paid in proportion to how much labor they exerted and that exploitation or usury was taking place if they were not. The theory was that unregulated banking would cause more money to be available and that this would allow proliferation of new businesses which would in turn raise demand for labor. This led Tucker to believe that the [[labor theory of value]] would be vindicated and equal amounts of labor would receive equal pay. Later in his life, Tucker grew skeptical that free competition could remove concentrated capital.<ref>McKain, Ian, ed. (2008). [https://usa.anarchistlibraries.net/library/the-anarchist-faq-editorial-collective-an-anarchist-faq-08-17 "Is individualist anarchism capitalistic?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201024064306/https://usa.anarchistlibraries.net/library/the-anarchist-faq-editorial-collective-an-anarchist-faq-08-17|date=2020-10-24}} ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]''. '''I''' Oakland: AK Press. {{ISBN|9781902593906}}.</ref>

=== Individualist anarchism and anarcho-capitalism ===
{{main|Anarcho-capitalism and individualist anarchism}}
{{see also|Anarchism and capitalism|Anarcho-capitalism and anarchism}}
While [[anarcho-capitalism]] is sometimes described as a form of individualist anarchism,<ref name="Ostergaard"/><ref name="Avrich 1996"/><ref name="Outhwaite 2003"/> some scholars have criticized those, including some [[Marxists]] and [[right-libertarians]], for taking it at face value.<ref name="Adams & Levy 2018">{{cite book|editor-last1=Adams|editor-first1=Matthew S.|editor-last2=Levy|editor-first2=Carl|year=2018|title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism|location=London|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|pages=64–66|isbn=978-3-319-75619-6}}</ref> Other scholars such as Benjamin Franks, who considers anarcho-capitalism part of individualist anarchism and hence excludes those forms of individualist anarchism that defend or reinforce hierarchical forms from the anarchist camp,<ref name="Franks 2013"/> have been criticized by those who include individualist anarchism as part of the anarchist and socialist traditions whilst excluding anarcho-capitalism,<ref name="Marshall 1992"/><ref name="Adams & Levy 2018"/> including the authors of ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]''.<ref name="AFAQ"/> Some anarchist scholars criticized those, especially in Anglo-American philosophy, who define anarchism only in terms of opposition to the state, when anarchism, including both individualist and social traditions, is much more than that.<ref>Morris, Brian (1998). [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/brian-morris-anthropology-and-anarchism "Anthropology and Anarchism"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108142614/https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/brian-morris-anthropology-and-anarchism |date=2020-11-08 }}. ''Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed''. '''16''' (1/45). p. 40. "Another criticism of anarchism is that it has a narrow view of politics: that it sees the state as the fount of all evil, ignoring other aspects of social and economic life. This is a misrepresentation of anarchism. It partly derives from the way anarchism has been defined, and partly because Marxist historians have tried to exclude anarchism from the broader socialist movement. But when one examines the writings of classical anarchists [...] as well as the character of anarchist movements, [...] it is clearly evident that it has never had this limited vision. It has always challenged all forms of authority and exploitation, and has been equally critical of capitalism and religion as it has been of the state."</ref><ref>McLaughlin, Paul (2007). ''Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism''. Ashgate. [https://books.google.com/books?id=kkj5i3CeGbQC pp. 28] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240208210722/https://books.google.com/books?id=kkj5i3CeGbQC |date=2024-02-08 }}–166. {{ISBN|9780754661962}}. "Anarchists do reject the state, as we will see. But to claim that this central aspect of anarchism is definitive is to sell anarchism short. [...] [Opposition to the state] is (contrary to what many scholars believe) ''not definitive of anarchism''."</ref><ref>Jun, Nathan (September 2009). "Anarchist Philosophy and Working Class Struggle: A Brief History and Commentary". ''WorkingUSA''. '''12''' (3): 505–519. {{doi|10.1111/j.1743-4580.2009.00251.x}}. {{ISSN|1089-7011}}. "One common misconception, which has been rehearsed repeatedly by the few Anglo-American philosophers who have bothered to broach the topic [...] is that anarchism can be defined solely in terms of opposition to states and governments" (p. 507).</ref><ref>Franks, Benjamin (August 2013). Freeden, Michael; Stears, Marc (eds.). "Anarchism". ''The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies''. Oxford University Press: 385–404. {{doi|10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0001}}. "[M]any, questionably, regard anti-statism as the irremovable, universal principle at the core of anarchism. [...] The fact that [anarchists and anarcho-capitalists] share a core concept of 'anti-statism', which is often advanced as [...] a commonality between them [...], is insufficient to produce a shared identity [...] because [they interpret] the concept of state-rejection [...] differently despite the initial similarity in nomenclature" (pp. 386–388).</ref> Anarchists, including both individualist and social anarchists, also criticized some Marxists and other socialists for excluding anarchism from the socialist camp.<ref name="AFAQ">{{cite book|editor-last=McKay|editor-first=Iain|year=2012|orig-year=2008|title=An Anarchist FAQ|volume=I/II|location=Stirling|publisher=AK Press|isbn=9781849351225}}</ref> In ''European Socialism: A History of Ideas and Movements'', Carl Landauer summarized the difference between communist and individualist anarchists by stating that "the communist anarchists also do not acknowledge any right to society to force the individual. They differ from the anarchistic individualists in their belief that men, if freed from coercion, will enter into voluntary associations of a communistic type, while the other wing believes that the free person will prefer a high degree of isolation".<ref name="AFAQ Appendix"/><ref>Landauer, Carl (1960). ''European Socialism: A History of Ideas and Movements''. University of California Press. p. 127.</ref>

Without the [[labor theory of value]],<ref name="Avrich 1996">Avrich, Paul (1996). ''Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America'' (abridged paperback ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 282. {{ISBN|9780691044941}}. "Although there are many honorable exceptions who still embrace the 'socialist' label, most people who call themselves individualist anarchists today are followers of Murray Rothbard's Austrian economics, and have abandoned the labor theory of value."</ref> some argue that 19th-century individualist anarchists approximate the modern movement of anarcho-capitalism,<ref name="Ostergaard"/><ref name="Outhwaite 2003">Outhwaite, William (2003). ''The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought''. "Anarchism". Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 13. {{ISBN|9780631221647}}. "Their successors today, such as Murray Rothbard, having abandoned the labor theory of value, describe themselves as anarcho-capitalists."</ref> although this has been contested<ref name="Franks 2013"/> or rejected.<ref name="Are Libertarians 'Anarchists'">Rothbard, Murray (1950s). [http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard167.html "Are Libertarians 'Anarchists'?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170113130534/http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard167.html |date=2017-01-13 }} Lew Rockwell.com. Retrieved 1 April 2020.</ref><ref>Wieck, David (1978). [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/david-wieck-anarchist-justice "Anarchist Justice"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200928054827/https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/david-wieck-anarchist-justice |date=2020-09-28 }}. In Chapman, John W.; Pennock, J. Roland Pennock, eds. ''Anarchism: Nomos XIX''. New York: New York University Press. pp. 227–228. "Out of the history of anarchist thought and action Rothbard has pulled forth a single thread, the thread of individualism, and defines that individualism in a way alien even to the spirit of a Max Stirner or a Benjamin Tucker, whose heritage I presume he would claim – to say nothing of how alien is his way to the spirit of Godwin, Proudhon, Bakunin, Kropotkin, Malatesta, and the historically anonymous persons who through their thoughts and action have tried to give anarchism a living meaning. Out of this thread Rothbard manufactures one more bourgeois ideology." Retrieved 7 April 2020.</ref><ref name="Peacott 1985">Peacott, Joe (18 April 1985). [http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/mcelroy2.html "Reply to Wendy Mc Elroy"]. ''New Libertarian'' (14, June 1985). {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170207212416/http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/mcelroy2.html|date=7 February 2017}}. Retrieved 7 April 2020. "In her article on individualist anarchism in the October, 1984, ''New Libertarian'', Wendy McElroy mistakenly claims that modern-day individualist anarchism is identical with anarchist capitalism. She ignores the fact that there are still individualist anarchists who reject capitalism as well as communism, in the tradition of Warren, Spooner, Tucker, and others. [...] Benjamin Tucker, when he spoke of his ideal 'society of contract,' was certainly not speaking of anything remotely resembling contemporary capitalist society. [...] I do not quarrel with McElroy's definition of herself as an individualist anarchist. However, I dislike the fact that she tries to equate the term with anarchist capitalism. This is simply not true. I am an individualist anarchist and I am opposed to capitalist economic relations, voluntary or otherwise."</ref><ref>Baker, J. W. "Native American Anarchism". ''The Raven''. '''10''' (1): 43‒62. Retrieved 7 April 2020. "It is time that anarchists recognise the valuable contributions of individualist anarchist theory and take advantage of its ideas. It would be both futile and criminal to leave it to the capitalist libertarians, whose claims on Tucker and the others can be made only by ignoring the violent opposition they had to capitalist exploitation and monopolistic 'free enterprise' supported by the state."</ref> As economic theory changed, the popularity of the labor theory of [[classical economics]] was superseded by the [[subjective theory of value]] of [[neoclassical economics]] and [[Murray Rothbard]], a student of [[Ludwig von Mises]], combined Mises' [[Austrian School]] of economics with the absolutist views of human rights and rejection of the state he had absorbed from studying the individualist American anarchists of the 19th century such as Tucker and Spooner.<ref>Miller, David, ed. (1987). ''The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought''. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 290. {{ISBN|0-631-17944-5}}.</ref> In the mid-1950s, Rothbard was concerned with differentiating himself from communist and socialistic economic views of other anarchists, including the individualist anarchists of the 19th century, arguing that "we are not anarchists [...] but not archists either [...]. Perhaps, then, we could call ourselves by a new name: nonarchist".<ref name="Are Libertarians 'Anarchists'"/><ref name="Franks 2013"/> Joe Peacott, an American individualist in the [[Mutualism (economic theory)|mutualist]] tradition, criticizes anarcho-capitalists for trying to hegemonize the individualist anarchism label and make appear as if all individualist anarchists are in favor of [[capitalism]].<ref name="Peacott 1985"/> Peacott states that "individualists, both past and present, agree with the communist anarchists that present-day capitalism is based on economic coercion, not on voluntary contract. Rent and interest are mainstays of modern capitalism, and are protected and enforced by the state. Without these two unjust institutions, capitalism could not exist".<ref>Peacott, Joe (18 April 1985). [http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/mcelroy2.html "Reply to Wendy Mc Elroy"]. ''New Libertarian'' (14, June 1985). {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170207212416/http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/mcelroy2.html|date=7 February 2017}}. Retrieved 7 April 2020. "In her overview of anarchist history, McElroy criticizes the individualists of the past for their belief in the labor theory of value, because it fails to distinguish between profit and plunder. Some anarchist individualists still believe that profit is theft, and that living off the labor of others is immoral. And some individualists, both past and present, agree with the communist anarchists that present-day capitalism is based on economic coercion, not on voluntary contract. Rent and interest are mainstays of modern capitalism, and are protected and enforced by the state. Without these two unjust institutions, capitalism could not exist. These two institutions, and the money monopoly of the state, effectively prevent most people from being economically independent, and force them into wage labor. Saying that coercion does not exist i[n] capitalist economic relations because workers aren't forced to work by armed capitalists ignores the very real economic coercion caused by this alliance of capitalism and the state. People don't voluntarily work for wages or pay rent, except in the sense that most people 'voluntarily' pay taxes[.] Because one recognizes when she or he is up against superior force, and chooses to compromise in order to survive, does not make these activities voluntary; at least, not in the way I envision voluntary relations in an anarchist society."</ref>

There is a strong current within anarchism including anarchist activists and scholars which rejects that anarcho-capitalism can be considered a part of the anarchist movement because anarchism has historically been an [[anti-capitalist]] movement and anarchists see it as incompatible with capitalist forms.<ref>Marshall, Peter (1992). ''Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism''. London: HarperCollins. pp. 564–565. {{ISBN|978-0-00-217855-6}}. "Anarcho-capitalists are against the State simply because they are capitalists first and foremost. [...] They are not concerned with the social consequences of capitalism for the weak, powerless and ignorant. [...] As such, anarcho-capitalism overlooks the egalitarian implications of traditional individualist anarchists like Spooner and Tucker. In fact, few anarchists would accept the 'anarcho-capitalists' into the anarchist camp since they do not share a concern for economic equality and social justice. Their self-interested, calculating market men would be incapable of practising voluntary co-operation and mutual aid. Anarcho-capitalists, even if they do reject the state, might therefore best be called right-wing libertarians rather than anarchists."</ref><ref>Sabatini, Peter (Fall/Winter 1994–1995). [http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-sabatini-libertarianism-bogus-anarchy "Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200807055624/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-sabatini-libertarianism-bogus-anarchy/ |date=2020-08-07 }}. ''[[Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed]]'' (41). Retrieved September 4, 2020. "Within [capitalist] Libertarianism, Rothbard represents a minority perspective that actually argues for the total elimination of the state. However Rothbard's claim as an anarchist is quickly voided when it is shown that he only wants an end to the public state. In its place he allows countless private states, with each person supplying their own police force, army, and law, or else purchasing these services from capitalist venders [...] so what remains is shrill anti-statism conjoined to a vacuous freedom in hackneyed defense of capitalism. In sum, the "anarchy" of Libertarianism reduces to a liberal fraud."</ref><ref>Meltzer, Albert (2000). [https://archive.org/details/anarchism00albe ''Anarchism: Arguments For and Against'']. Oakland: AK Press. p. 50. "The philosophy of 'anarcho-capitalism' dreamed up by the 'libertarian' New Right, has nothing to do with Anarchism as known by the Anarchist movement proper."</ref><ref>Goodway, David (2006). ''[[Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow: Left-Libertarian Thought and British Writers from William Morris to Colin Ward]]''. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. p. 4. "'Libertarian' and 'libertarianism' are frequently employed by anarchists as synonyms for 'anarchist' and 'anarchism', largely as an attempt to distance themselves from the negative connotations of 'anarchy' and its derivatives. The situation has been vastly complicated in recent decades with the rise of anarcho-capitalism, 'minimal statism' and an extreme right-wing laissez-faire philosophy advocated by such theorists as Rothbard and Nozick and their adoption of the words 'libertarian' and 'libertarianism'. It has therefore now become necessary to distinguish between their right libertarianism and the left libertarianism of the anarchist tradition."</ref><ref>Newman, Saul (2010). ''The Politics of Postanarchism''. Edinburgh University Press. p. 43. "It is important to distinguish between anarchism and certain strands of right-wing libertarianism which at times go by the same name (for example, Rothbard's anarcho-capitalism)." {{ISBN|0748634959}}</ref><ref>McKain, Ian, ed. (2008). [http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secFcon.html "Is 'anarcho'-capitalism a type of anarchism?"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190909065550/http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secFcon.html |date=2019-09-09 }} ''[[An Anarchist FAQ]]''. '''I''' Oakland: AK Press. {{ISBN|9781902593906}}.</ref> Although some regard anarcho-capitalism as a form of individualist anarchism,<ref name=marx>{{cite book|last=Bottomore|first=Tom|year=1991|chapter=Anarchism|url=https://archive.org/details/dictionarymarxis00bott|url-access=limited|title=A Dictionary of Marxist Thought|location=Oxford|publisher=Blackwell Reference|page=[https://archive.org/details/dictionarymarxis00bott/page/n22 21]|isbn=0-63118082-6}}</ref><ref name="accounts">See
* Alan and Trombley, Stephen (Eds.) Bullock, ''The Norton Dictionary of Modern Thought'', W. W. Norton & Co (1999), p. 30.
* Barry, Norman. ''Modern Political Theory'', 2000, Palgrave, p. 70.
* Adams, Ian. ''Political Ideology Today'', Manchester University Press (2002) {{ISBN|0-7190-6020-6}}, p. 135.
* Grant, Moyra. ''Key Ideas in Politics'', Nelson Thomas 2003 {{ISBN|0-7487-7096-8}}, p. 91.
* Heider, Ulrike. ''Anarchism: Left, Right, and Green'', City Lights, 1994. p. 3.
* [[Paul Avrich|Avrich, Paul]]. ''[[Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America]]'', Abridged Paperback Edition (1996), p. 282.
* Tormey, Simon. ''Anti-Capitalism'', One World, 2004. pp. 118–119.
* [[Ralph Raico|Raico, Ralph]]. ''Authentic German Liberalism of the 19th Century'', École Polytechnique, Centre de Recherche en Épistémologie Appliquée, Unité associée au CNRS, 2004.
* Busky, Donald. Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey, Praeger/Greenwood (2000), p. 4.
* Heywood, Andrew. Politics: Second Edition, Palgrave (2002), p. 61.
* Offer, John. ''Herbert Spencer: Critical Assessments'', Routledge (UK) (2000), p. 243.</ref> many others disagree with it and contest there is a socialist–individualist divide as individualist anarchism is largely socialistic.<ref name="Franks 2013"/><ref>{{cite book|editor-last=McKay|editor-first=Iain|year=2012|title=An Anarchist FAQ|volume=II|location=Stirling|publisher=AK Press|isbn=9781849351225}}</ref> Rothbard argued that individualist anarchism is different from anarcho-capitalism and other capitalist theories due to the individualist anarchists retaining the [[labor theory of value]] and [[socialist economics]].<ref name="Are Libertarians 'Anarchists'"/> Similarly, many writers deny that anarcho-capitalism is a form of anarchism<ref>See
* K, David. "What is Anarchism?" Bastard Press (2005)
* Marshall, Peter. Demanding the Impossible, London: Fontana Press, 1992 ({{ISBN|0-00-686245-4}}) Chapter 38
* MacSaorsa, Iain. "Is 'anarcho' capitalism against the state?" Spunk Press (archive)
* Wells, Sam. "Anarcho-Capitalism is Not Anarchism, and Political Competition is Not Economic Competition" Frontlines 1 (January 1979)</ref> and that capitalism is compatible with anarchism.<ref>See
* Peikoff, Leonard. 'Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand' Dutton Adult (1991) Chapter "Government"
* Doyle, Kevin. 'Crypto Anarchy, Cyberstates, and Pirate Utopias' New York: Lexington Books, (2002) pp. 447–48
* Sheehan, Seán M. 'Anarchism' Reaktion Books, 2003 p. 17
* Kelsen, Hans. The Communist Theory of Law. Wm. S. Hein Publishing (1988) p. 110
* Egbert. Tellegen, Maarten. Wolsink 'Society and Its Environment: an introduction' Routledge (1998) p. 64
* Jones, James 'The Merry Month of May' Akashic Books (2004) pp. 37–38
* Sparks, Chris. Isaacs, Stuart 'Political Theorists in Context' Routledge (2004) p. 238
* Bookchin, Murray. 'Post-Scarcity Anarchism' AK Press (2004) p. 37
* Berkman, Alexander. 'Life of an Anarchist' Seven Stories Press (2005) p. 268.</ref>

''The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism'' writes that "[a]s Benjamin Franks rightly points out, individualisms that defend or reinforce hierarchical forms such as the economic-power relations of anarcho-capitalism are incompatible with practices of social anarchism based on developing immanent goods which contest such as inequalities". Laurence Davis cautiosly asks "[I]s anarcho-capitalism really a form of anarchism or instead a wholly different ideological paradigm whose adherents have attempted to expropriate the language of anarchism for their own anti-anarchist ends?" Davis cites [[Iain McKay]], "whom Franks cites as an authority to support his contention that 'academic analysis has followed activist currents in rejecting the view that anarcho-capitalism has anything to do with social anarchism'", as arguing "quite emphatically on the very pages cited by Franks that anarcho-capitalism is by no means a type of anarchism". McKay writes that "[i]t is important to stress that anarchist opposition to the so-called capitalist 'anarchists' does ''not'' reflect some kind of debate within anarchism, as many of these types like to pretend, but a debate between anarchism and its old enemy capitalism. [...] Equally, given that anarchists and 'anarcho'-capitalists have fundamentally ''different'' analyses and goals it is hardly 'sectarian' to point this out".<ref name="Adams & Levy 2018 p. 64">{{cite book|editor-last1=Adams|editor-first1=Matthew S.|editor-last2=Levy|editor-first2=Carl|year=2018|title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism|location=London|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|page=64|isbn=978-3-319-75619-6}}</ref>

Davis writes that "Franks asserts without supporting evidence that most major forms of individualist anarchism have been largely anarcho-capitalist in content, and concludes from this premise that most forms of individualism are incompatible with anarchism". Davis argues that "the conclusion is unsuistainable because the premise is false, depending as it does for any validity it might have on the further assumption that anarcho-capitalism is indeed a form of anarchism. If we reject this view, then we must also reject the individual anarchist versus the communal anarchist 'chasm' style of argument that follows from it".<ref name="Adams & Levy 2018 p. 64"/> Davis maintains that "the ideological core of anarchism is the belief that society can and should be organised without hierarchy and domination. Historically, anarchists have struggles against a wide range of regimes of domination, from capitalism, the state system, patriarchy, heterosexism, and the domination of nature to colonialism, the war system, slavery, fascism, white supremacy, and certain forms of organised religion". According to Davis, "[w]hile these visions range from the predominantly individualistic to the predominantly communitarian, features common to virtually all include an emphasis on self-management and self-regulatory methods of organisation, voluntary association, decentralised society, based on the principle of free association, in which people will manage and govern themselves".<ref>{{cite book|editor-last1=Adams|editor-first1=Matthew S.|editor-last2=Levy|editor-first2=Carl|year=2018|title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism|location=London|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|page=65|isbn=978-3-319-75619-6}}</ref> Finally, Davis includes a footnote stating that "[i]ndividualist anarchism may plausibly be re regarded as a form of both socialism and anarchism. Whether the individualist anarchists were ''consistent'' anarchists (and socialists) is another question entirely. [...] McKay comments as follows: 'any individualist anarchism which support wage labour is ''inconsistent'' anarchism. It ''can'' easily be made ''consistent'' anarchism by applying its own principles consistently. In contrast 'anarcho'-capitalism rejects so many of the basic, underlying, principles of anarchism [...] that it cannot be made consistent with the ideals of anarchism'".<ref>{{cite book|editor-last1=Adams|editor-first1=Matthew S.|editor-last2=Levy|editor-first2=Carl|year=2018|title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism|location=London|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|pages=65–66|isbn=978-3-319-75619-6}}</ref>

== References ==
{{reflist|30em}}

== Bibliography ==
{{refbegin|2}}
* {{cite book|editor-last=Brooks|editor-first=Frank H.|year=1994|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gHyUj9HFYBIC|title=The Individualist Anarchists: An Anthology of Liberty (1881–1908)|publisher=[[Transaction Publishers]]|location=[[New Brunswick]]|lccn=93-30303|isbn=1-56000-132-1}}
* {{cite book|chapter=Anarchism and Markets|last=Carson|first=Kevin|author-link=Kevin Carson|year=2017|location=[[Leiden]]|publisher=[[Brill Publishers|Brill]]|editor-first=Nathan|editor-last=Jun|title=Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy|isbn=978-90-04-35689-4|pages=81–119|doi=10.1163/9789004356894_005|url=https://brill.com/view/title/35861|access-date=2023-11-07|archive-date=2021-11-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108204904/https://brill.com/view/title/35861|url-status=live}} 
* {{cite book|editor-last1=Chartier|editor-first1=Gary|editor-last2=Johnson|editor-first2=Charles W.|year=2011|title=Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty|location=[[Brooklyn]]|publisher=[[Autonomedia|Minor Compositions]]|isbn=978-1-57027-242-4}}
* {{Cite book|last=Davis|first=Laurence|year=2019|chapter=Individual and Community|editor-first1=Carl|editor-last1=Levy|editor-first2=Matthew S.|editor-last2=Adams|title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism|doi=10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2_3|isbn=978-3-319-75620-2|publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]]|lccn=2018942897|pages=47–70|s2cid=150149495 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Díez |first1=Xavier |title=El anarquismo individualista en España 1923-1938 |date=2007 |url=http://libros.metabiblioteca.org/handle/001/450 |isbn=978-84-96044-87-6 |publisher=Virus Editorial |location=Barcelona |df=mdy-all |language=es |access-date=2017-06-24 |archive-date=2021-03-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210323075247/https://libros.metabiblioteca.org/handle/001/450 |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book|last=Egoumenides|first=Magda|year=2020|chapter=Anarchism and Political Obligation|editor-first1=Gary|editor-last1=Chartier|editor-first2=Chad|editor-last2=Van Schoelandt|title=The Routledge Handbook of Anarchy and Anarchist Thought|pages=207–221 |location=[[New York City|New York]]|publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=9781315185255|doi=10.4324/9781315185255-14|s2cid=228898569 }} 
* {{cite book|chapter=Anarchism and Libertarianism|last=Long|first=Roderick T.|year=2017|location=[[Leiden]]|publisher=[[Brill Publishers|Brill]]|editor-first=Nathan|editor-last=Jun|title=Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy|isbn=978-90-04-35689-4|pages=285–317|doi=10.1163/9789004356894_012|url=https://brill.com/view/title/35861|access-date=2023-11-07|archive-date=2021-11-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108204904/https://brill.com/view/title/35861|url-status=live}} 
* {{cite book|last=Long|first=Roderick T.|year=2020|chapter=The Anarchist Landscape|editor-first1=Gary|editor-last1=Chartier|editor-first2=Chad|editor-last2=Van Schoelandt|title=The Routledge Handbook of Anarchy and Anarchist Thought|pages=28–38 |location=[[New York City|New York]]|publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=9781315185255|doi=10.4324/9781315185255-2|s2cid=228898569 }} 
* {{cite book|last=Mack|first=Eric|year=2020|chapter=Rights, Morality and Egoism in Individualist Anarchism|editor-first1=Gary|editor-last1=Chartier|editor-first2=Chad|editor-last2=Van Schoelandt|title=The Routledge Handbook of Anarchy and Anarchist Thought|pages=126–151 |location=[[New York City|New York]]|publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=9781315185255|doi=10.4324/9781315185255-9|s2cid=228898569 }} 
* {{cite book|author-link=James J. Martin (historian)|last=Martin|first=James J.|year=1970|orig-year=1953|url=https://archive.org/details/menagainststatee00martrich|title=Men Against the State: the State the Expositors of Individualist Anarchism|location=[[Colorado Springs]]|publisher=Ralph Myles Publisher|lccn=82465150|oclc=8827896}}
* {{cite book |last=Parry |first=Richard |title=The Bonnot Gang |url=https://archive.org/details/bonnotgang0000parr |url-access=registration |location=[[London]] |publisher=Rebel Press |year=1987 |isbn=0-946061-04-1 }}
* {{cite book|last=Parvulescu|first=Constantin|url=https://www.academia.edu/38180363|year=2018|title=The Individualist Anarchism of Early Interwar Germany|publisher=[[Cluj University Press]]|isbn=978-606-37-0486-4}}
* {{cite book|last=Perraudeau|first=Michel|title=Dictionnaire de l'individualisme libertaire|publisher=éditions Libertaires|year=2011|isbn=978-2-919568-06-2|language=fr}}
* {{cite book|author-link=Rudolf Rocker|last=Rocker|first=Rudolf|title=Pioneers of American Freedom: Origin of Liberal and Radical Thought in America|title-link=Pioneers of American Freedom|year=1949|translator-first=Arthur E.|translator-last=Briggs|publisher=Rocker Publishing Committee|location=[[Los Angeles]]}}
* {{Cite book|last=Ryley|first=Peter|year=2019|chapter=Individualism|editor-first1=Carl|editor-last1=Levy|editor-first2=Matthew S.|editor-last2=Adams|title=The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism|doi=10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2_12|isbn=978-3-319-75620-2|publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]]|lccn=2018942897|pages=225–236|s2cid=242080801 }}
* {{cite book|chapter=Anarchism and Nineteenth-Century American Political Thought|last=Sartwell|first=Crispin|year=2017|location=[[Leiden]]|publisher=[[Brill Publishers|Brill]]|editor-first=Nathan|editor-last=Jun|title=Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy|isbn=978-90-04-35689-4|pages=454–483|doi=10.1163/9789004356894_018|url=https://brill.com/view/title/35861|access-date=2023-11-07|archive-date=2021-11-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108204904/https://brill.com/view/title/35861|url-status=live}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Skoble |first=Aeon |editor-first=Ronald |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |chapter=Individualist Anarchism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |year=2008 |publisher=[[SAGE Publications|SAGE]]; [[Cato Institute]] |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n149 |isbn=978-1-4129-6580-4 |oclc=750831024 |lccn=2008009151 |pages=243–44 |title=Archived copy |access-date=2016-03-18 |archive-date=2023-01-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230109234738/https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book|last=Sonn|first=Richard D.|year=2010|title=Sex, Violence, and the Avant-Garde: Anarchism in Interwar France|title-link=Sex, Violence, and the Avant-Garde|publisher=[[Penn State University Press]]|isbn=978-0-271-03663-2}}
* {{cite book|last=Steiner|first=Anne|title=Les en-dehors: Anarchistes individualistes et illégalistes à la " Belle époque "|publisher=L'Echappée|year=2008|language=fr}}
* {{cite book|author=Various Authors|url=https://archive.org/details/EnemiesOfSocietyAnAnthologyOfIndividualistEgoistThought/|title=Enemies of Society: An Anthology of Individualist & Egoist Thought|publisher=Ardent Press|year=2011}}
* {{cite book|last=Vest|first=J. Martin|year=2020|chapter=Barbarians in the Agora: American Market Anarchism, 1945–2011|editor-first1=Gary|editor-last1=Chartier|editor-first2=Chad|editor-last2=Van Schoelandt|title=The Routledge Handbook of Anarchy and Anarchist Thought|pages=112–125 |location=[[New York City|New York]]|publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=9781315185255|doi=10.4324/9781315185255-8|s2cid=228898569 }}
{{refend}}

== Further reading ==
{{refbegin}}
* [http://www.panarchy.org/bliss/individualistanarchism.html William D. P. Bliss, Historical Sketch of Individualist Anarchism (1897)] with further references
{{refend}}

==External links==
{{Wikiquote}}
*{{Commons category-inline|Individualist anarchism}}
*Archives of [http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/topics/individualist.html individualist] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140201214807/http://theanarchistlibrary.org/topics/individualist.html |date=2014-02-01 }} and [http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/topics/egoist.html egoist] texts at the Anarchist Library.

{{Anarchism}}
{{Libertarianism}}
{{Portal bar|Anarchism}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Individualist anarchism| ]]
[[Category:Anarchist schools of thought]]
[[Category:Left-libertarianism]]
[[Category:Libertarianism by form]]
[[Category:Individualism|Anarchism]]
[[Category:Political theories]]